
Olympus C-3030Z Review, Phil Askey, May 2000

Review based on a Production Model Olympus
C-3030Z
Olympus's upgraded C-2020Z is the C-3030Z, with pretty
much similar features to its older brother but with a nice new black metallic
case, wider shooting angles and the 3.3 megapixel CCD. The C-3030Z will
probably be up near the top of most buyers lists and just like the C-2020Z
there'll always be a fierce debate over the Olympus C-3030Z and Nikon
Coolpix 990.
In many places in this review I will refer to how "it
compares with the 990", simply because (a) the 990 starts this review
as the leading camera in my experience and (b) that's the most common
comparison buyers will make (990 vs. C-3030Z).

The C-2020Z
On
19th October 1999 the C-2020Z came as an upgrade and set of fixes from
the popular C-2000Z. Olympus had corrected some of the initial niggles
expressed by reviewers and owners alike. The power switch was moved onto
the mode dial rather than being placed inside it (leading to no end of
accidental shutdowns instead of shots taken) and most of the useful controls
(macro, flash, manual focus) were moved to buttons on the case rather
than being buried in the menu system.
They also enhanced the operation of the camera, including
a very nice magnifying loupe when using manual focus and support for QuickTime
movies.

The C-3030Z
Announced on the 27th January 2000, the C-3030Z immediately
generated a lot of interest as it was yet another new camera into the
3.34 megapixel class. Finished in the new black metallic look and offering
higher resolution and slightly expanded features it quickly went onto
peoples buying lists.
The biggest questions on everyone's lips was what about
image quality? The C-2020Z often rumbled with the 950, it looked as though
the C-3030Z was immediately being compared to Nikon's new 990.
One thing we didn't all notice were the little cutouts
in the lens (see image right), these are down to the newer wide angle
(32mm - 96mm vs. 36mm - 115mm on the C-2020Z). Without these four little
cutouts we'd see vignetting at wide angles (edge of the lens becoming
visible on the final image).

What's new since the C-2020Z?
What's Changed?
- 3.34 megapixel CCD, 2048 x 1536 (3.14 effective) vs. 1600 x 1200 (1.92
effective)
- Larger internal memory buffer (faster operation but necessary for
the extra pixels)
- Lens now 32mm to 96mm vs. 38mm to 115mm
- Lens slower (F2.8 vs. F2.0)
- Full-Time AF option (continual focusing)
- Smooth digital zoom up to 2.5x
- Flash output adjustment (+/-2EV in 0.3EV steps)
- Flash sync connector now Olympus proprietary 5-pin connector
- Custom startup settings
- Neck strap mounts changed
- Thicker hand grip
- Re-orientated battery compartment and improved battery door
- Different top "control panel" LCD layout
- Support for the new proprietary Olympus CR-V3 Lithium batteries (big
deal!)
- Audio recording / AV Movies
- 16MB SmartMedia bundled vs. 8MB
- Rechargeable batteries & Charger no longer included (boo!)
- USB connectivity
- All metal case (C-2020Z was half metallic half plastic)
What's still missing?
- A focus indicator bracket [ ] in the LCD display
- Manual preset white balance / white balance fine-tuning (this IS useful)
If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital
Photography Glossary before diving into this review (it may help you
understand some of the terms used).
|
Photographs of the camera
were taken with a Nikon Coolpix 990, images which can be viewed
at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom
right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a
larger (normally 1024 x 768 or smaller if cropped) image in a new
window.
To navigate the review simply
use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section
either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the
navigation bar at the top.
|
This review is Copyright 2000 Phil
Askey and the review in part or in whole may NOT be reproduced in any
electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.
For information on reproducing any part of this review (or any images)
please contact: Phil Askey.
|