Nikon Coolpix 950 Review, Phil Askey, April 1999

Nikon Coolpix 950 |
Since the story broke
back in mid--February, the Nikon Coolpix 950 (referred
to as the 950 from now onwards) has generated a fever
which has gripped the digital photography world on
the Internet, firstly with its announcement and the
rush from the major websites to publish as much information
as possible. To the newsgroups buzzing with rumours
and specifications to resellers pre-selling hundreds
of units.
|
Why would this
be so? For people new to the digital camera market this behaviour
probably seems a little extreme. The excitement around the 950
grew up from the reputation of the Nikon Coolpix 900s (also known
as the E910 in Japan), this very fine camera opened peoples eyes
to the abilities of digital cameras to capture the moment in a
high quality, detailed and well balanced manner, some people found
it's swivel body design (now inherited by the 950) a little quirky
but once you get used to it it is actually quite comfortable and
useful, and offers a slim easy to carry package when not being
used.

The 900s wasn't without it's faults
however, with stories of cameras breaking at the "weak spot"
swivel joint to out of focus viewfinders, failing zoom buttons,
lockups and hanging units. However, the general concesus of opinion
on the 900s was that it was (arguably) at the time the best digital
camera (in that price band) on the market.
Without doubt the inspiration for
this website grew out of my ownership of a 900s last August (1998),
slowly building up from a place of photo galleries (some of which
are still here) to daily news, reviews and forums.
Then, suddenly 900s's were in short
supply, with rumours that Nikon were having production problems
they finally announced that they were no longer producing the
900s... What did they have up their sleeves?
And here my task is to review the
950, the first review of a production model 950. Coming from such
a strong stable the 950 has an important job to do for Nikon and
there are high expectations in the market for this camera (not
least represented by the frantic messaging on rec.photo.digital
of estimated delivery dates for the camera - almost as bad as
when Sony released the D700).

Since inception of
this site I have built up a reputation for writing reviews "as
it is" and not sugar-coating cameras to be something they're
not. You can be sure that the 950 will get a thorough and severe
review. Sometime after the review I will be posting a separate
article which will directly compare the Canon Powershot Pro 70
with the Nikon Coolpix 950 side-by-side, both on features and
image quality. For most consumers "in the know" these
two cameras will probably be at the top of their shortlist.
If you're new to digital
photography you may want to read my Digital
Photography Glossary before diving into this review (it MAY
help you understand some of the terms I use).
This review is pretty
huge actually, in fact it's the biggest and most detailed review
I've ever carried out (and in the shortest time too... I'm knackered!).
(Please take time
to read the WHOLE review to understand my comments in context,
the contents page here is design to be used if you come back to
the review at a later date) You can skip the contents if you like:
|
Photographs
of the camera were taken with Canon PowerShot Pro70,
most images can be "clicked on" which will
display a larger (normally 768 x 512) image in a new
window. To
navigate the review simply click on the section headings
in the frame above.
(This
review is longer than previous reviews and therefore
some sections have been broken into multiple pages,
use the
button on the bottom of the page to move to the next
page)
|
This review is copyright
1999 Phil Askey and the review in part or in whole may NOT be
reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission
from the author: Phil Askey. For information on reproducing any
part of this review (or any images) please contact: Phil Askey.
|