
Compared to... (contd.)
Colour Chart Comparison
We'll now compare the G2's colour reproduction and resolution
to the Olympus C-4040Z, Sony DSC-S85 and Nikon Coolpix 995 (the only three
megapixel digital camera here, so it won't be included in the resolution
comparison).
Colour charts are shot in daylight, Auto White Balance,
EV compensation +0.3 (all cameras), measured light ~10 EV. This test is
also dependent on the accuracy of the camera's auto white balance, the
colour charts are shot in daylight but some camera's white balance is
better than others. All cameras are given 20 seconds to "settle"
before the shot is taken.
 |
 |
| Canon PowerShot G2 |
Olympus C-4040Z |
 |
 |
| Sony DSC-S85 |
Nikon Coolpix 995 |
How far we've come, four cameras from four different manufacturers all delivering
quite similar colour reproduction. There isn't a single colour patch here
that's noticeably 'worse' than the next, each camera has its own slightly
different characteristics but overall they're very close. The G2 shows its
preferences for light blue as well as fairly strong red and yellow.
In the table below we're only measuring colour. The RGB
values were measured from a VGA reduced image (to average colours, remove
noise and eliminate JPEG artifacts) using the Eyedropper tool in Photoshop
with a 5 by 5 Average Sample Size.
| Patch |
Canon
PowerShot G2 |
Olympus
C-4040Z |
Sony
DSC-S85 |
Nikon
Coolpix 995
|
| Black |
45,43,42 |
35,36,35 |
17,17,19 |
25,25,23 |
| |
|
|
|
| Middle
Gray |
107,106,110 |
111,105,110 |
76,81,79 |
103,103,102 |
| |
|
|
|
| White |
208,210,208 |
211,210,217 |
188,189,189 |
215,215,211 |
| |
|
|
|
| Magenta |
196,37,116 |
190,46,110 |
170,12,124 |
207,38,117 |
| |
|
|
|
| Red |
195,30,35 |
178,44,45 |
176,0,40 |
197,31,50 |
| |
|
|
|
| Yellow |
205,195,20 |
191,195,65 |
181,180,14 |
216,188,36 |
| |
|
|
|
| Green |
43,152,68 |
41,145,84 |
24,131,27 |
8,136,61 |
| |
|
|
|
| Cyan |
23,169,234 |
52,166,220 |
23,158,175 |
52,164,196 |
| |
|
|
|
| Blue |
61,56,133 |
75,58,118 |
23,31,112 |
41,33,84 |
| |
|
|
|
Again, although there's definitely some difference in the amount of saturation
there's not a huge difference between these four cameras, maybe the DSC-S85
gets the edge for slightly 'purer' primary colours. But it really is a
matter of personal preference. The G2 and the Coolpix 995 both allow the
user to change the colour saturation output of the camera, thus allowing
you to decide on your preferred output.

Red Channel Noise
Something we noticed early on with the current crop of
3 megapixel cameras was a certain amount of noise in the red channel.
This was most visible in the light blue of skies or painted walls. Our
colour patch test chart turned out to be a good "leveller" and
a way to measure the performance of one camera to the next.
The samples below are of 40 x 40 blocks cropped from
the colour comparison charts above of the Blue and Cyan patches. Each
block is then broken down into it's red green and blue channels and reflected
as such directly below.

While the G2 isn't entire devoid of red channel noise it does seem to
at least have it under control, again the best performer in this comparison
appears to be the Sony DSC-S85.

Resolution Chart Comparison
Shots here are of the PIMA/ISO 12233 standard resolution
test chart (more of which are available in our comparison
database). This resolution chart allows us to measure the actual performance
of the lens and sensor system. It measures the ability of the camera to
resolve lines at gradually higher resolutions and enables us to provide
a definitive value for comparison purposes. Values on the chart are 1/100th
lines per picture height. So a value of 8 equates to 800 lines per picture
height.
Studio light, cameras set to auto, all settings factory
default. Exposure compensation +0.7 EV for all cameras.
| Horizontal resolution |
Vertical resolution |
5 degree diagonal
res. |
 |
 |
 |
| Canon PowerShot G2 |
 |
 |
 |
| Olympus C-4040Z |
 |
 |
 |
| Sony DSC-S85 |
Measurable findings (three measurements taken for each camera):
| Camera |
Measurement |
Absolute Res. |
Extinction Res. |
| Canon PowerShot
G2 |
Horiz LPH |
1250 |
*1450 |
| Vert LPH |
1200 |
*1500 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
1000 |
n/a |
| Olympus
C-4040Z |
Horiz LPH |
1150 |
*1350 |
| Vert LPH |
1100 |
1400 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
1000 |
n/a |
| Sony DSC-S85
|
Horiz LPH |
1250 |
*1650 |
| Vert LPH |
1200 |
1650 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
1000 |
n/a |
* Some artifacts / moiré visible
Definition of terms:
| LPH |
Lines per Picture Height (to allow
for different aspect ratios the measurement is the same for horizontal
and vertical) |
| 5o Diagonal |
Lines set at 5o diagonal |
| Absolute Resolution |
Still defined detail (below Nyquist
frequency*) |
| Extinction Resolution |
Detail beyond camera's definition
(becomes a solid gray alias) |
| n/a |
Not Available (above the capability
of the test chart) |
| n/v |
Not Visible (not visible on test
results) |
* Nyquist frequency defined as the highest spatial frequency
where the CCD can still faithfully record
image detail. Beyond the Nyquist frequency aliasing occurs.
The G2 is up there with the DSC-S85 for absolute resolution,
approximately 1200 lines/picture height in both horizontal and vertical
directions is what we'd expect of a four megapixel digital cameras. What's
slightly disappointing are the jagged 'stepping' edges to the G2's diagonals
and the odd misplaced pixels once resolution goes beyond the camera's
ability.
I would suggest that these strong jaggies are a sharpening
artifact, clearly they really shouldn't be there.
|