Olympus E-510 EVOLT Review,
November 2007, Simon Joinson

Review based on a production E-510
Just before PMA in March 2007 Olympus lifted the curtain on two new Four-Thirds system compact digital SLRs, the E-410 (reviewed here in June) and this model, the E-510 (which is essentially a replacement for the well regarded E-500). Although the E-510 has much in common with its little brother, including an all-new (Matsushita) Live MOS Image Sensor that can provide Full Time Live-View on the LCD monitor and an updated TruePic image processor, it is a considerably more sophisticated tool with some important extra features. Key amongst these is a sensor-shift image stabilization system and more sophisticated external controls, though are also numerous minor feature differences too. Note that some of the text in this review (when describing identical functions) is repeated from the E-410 review.
Compared to E410 - key differences
Once you start to look under the hood there are actually a surprising number of differences between the E-410 and the E-510, even putting aside the obvious; the latter's CCD-shift image stabilization system and bulkier design (the E-510 has a true 'grip', something the E-410 does without). This is obviously a camera aimed far more squarely at the 'enthusiast' market than its kid brother, and it offers a far more sophisticated level of control and customization. Below is a far from exhaustive list of the key differences:
- Larger and heavier
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- Dedicated buttons for WB, ISO, Metering and AF mode
- Dedicated AF area button
- Customizable Fn button
- Two 'MyMode' custom modes
- Finer, customizable EV steps (1/3, 1/2 and 1 EV)
- Wider range of custom settings and minor extra features (e.g. file naming options, customizable HQ mode, Auto ISO limit etc)
- Very slightly different continuous shooting / buffering (6 raw frames vs 7 on the E-410)
- Optional wireless remote control
Key feature comparison (vs E-500 EVOLT)
Of course the E-510 is actually the successor to the E-500 (and the E-300 before it), and although the headline changes are significant (new sensor/processor, live view, in-body stabilization), there are also a number of minor feature tweaks and improvements (in fact far too many to list here, so we'll stick with the basics).
- New 10MP Live MOS sensor and TruePic III processor
- CCD-shift image stabilization
- The return of Live View
- New kit lenses
- Faster USB interface ('real' USB 2.0 speed)
- All-new body shape
- Wired remote option
- Slightly higher continuous shooting frame rate and larger raw buffer
- New high resolution LCD screen
- Loss of some minor features (ISO step control, manual focus bracketing, time lapse, customizable display color scheme, TIFF)
- A few new and/or improved features (true auto ISO with limit setting, noise filter)

If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital
Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help
you understand some of the terms used).
|
Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based
on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review
before coming to your own conclusions.
Images which can be viewed
at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom
right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a
larger (typically VGA) image in a new window.
To navigate the review simply
use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section
either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the
navigation bar at the top.
DPReview calibrate their
monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted)
PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make
out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale
blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should
be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally
A,B and C. |
 |
This article is Copyright 2007
dpreview.com and the review in part or in whole may NOT be reproduced in
any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.
For information on reproducing any part of this review (or any images)
please contact: Phil Askey |