Auto Focus LAG is (roughly) the amount of time it takes the camera to autofocus (a half-press and hold of the shutter release button), this timing is normally the most variable as its affected by the subject matter, current focus position, still or moving subject etc. This timing is an average. Shutter Release LAG is the amount of time it takes to take the shot from the moment you fully depress the shutter release button, measured both as a time including auto focus and a time assuming you have already pre-focused by holding a half-press of the shutter release.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Image Type | FPS Average | Max no. of frames *2 |
Wait before |
Full flush *4 |
| 2592 x 1944 Fine JPEG | 2.46 fps | 7 | 8.9 sec | 33.8 sec |
| 2592 x 1944 Normal JPEG | 2.56 fps | 7 | 8.1 sec | 21.7 sec |
| 1600 x 1200 Normal JPEG | 2.51 fps | 7 | 5.1 sec | 15.4 sec |
| 1024 x 768 Normal JPEG | 2.50 fps | 7 | 4.5 sec | 15.5 sec |
A fair performance, a good fast frame rate and relatively good buffer, certainly better than both the Canon G5 and Sony DSC-V1. Flush times here are acceptable.
| Image Type | FPS Average | Max no. of frames *2 |
Wait before |
Full flush *4 |
| 2592 x 1944 Fine JPEG | 1.30 fps | 17 | 12.1 sec | 2 min 57 sec |
| 2592 x 1944 Normal JPEG | 1.36 fps | 43 | 10.3 sec | 5 min 44 sec |
| 1600 x 1200 Normal JPEG | 1.51 fps | 109 | 9.2 sec | 12 min 18 sec |
| 1024 x 768 Normal JPEG | - | - | - | - |
I think it's fair to say that Nikon has a major bug with the Coolpix 5400's 'Continuous Low' mode, flush of the buffer full of images simply takes forever. I honestly gave up after doing the 1600 x 1200 timing, goodness only knows how long it would have taken for the 1024 x 768 buffer full. While the images are being written you can not change mode or switch off the camera.. That means take a full burst of 2592 x 1944 Normal JPEG images and the camera can not be powered off for over five minutes.
| Continuous Mode | FPS
Average |
Max no. of frames *2 | Full flush *4 |
| Continuous 16 | 2.02 fps | 16 | 5.0 sec |
| Ultra HS | 30.0 fps | 100 | 89.2 sec |
| Last 5 | 2.09 fps | 5 | 20.1 sec |
| *1 | Delay after first frame is always longer than shooting speed for subsequent frames, this drags the average fps down. |
| *2 | In a single "burst" (finger held down on shutter release) |
| *3 | You can take a frame as soon as there is space in the cameras internal buffer (writing continues "in the background"). |
| *4 | Amount of time after the last shot to write the entire burst of images to the Compact Flash card. |
Timings shown below are the time taken for the camera to process and "flush" the image out to the CF card, the timer was started as soon as the shutter release was pressed and stopped when activity indicator LED beside the viewfinder stopped blinking. This means the timings also include the cameras processing time and as such are more representative of the actual time to "complete the task". The media used for these tests was a 256 MB Viking CF card.
| Image Type | Time
to write (secs) *1 |
Time
to display (secs) *2 |
File
size (approx.) *3 |
Images
on a 256 MB CF *4 |
| 2592 x 1944 TIFF | 24.7 | <0.1 | 14,874 KB | 16 |
| 2592 x 1944 Fine JPEG | 6.8 | 2.5 | 2,400 KB | 101 |
| 2592 x 1944 Normal JPEG | 3.9 | 1.5 | 1,000 KB | 200 |
| 1600 x 1200 Normal JPEG | 2.3 | 0.9 | 400 KB | 503 |
| 1024 x 768 Normal JPEG | 1.9 | 0.5 | 180 KB | 1115 |
| *1 | If you disable image review after the shot (Setup -> Monitor Options -> Display mode -> Preview only) this write action takes 1.0 seconds longer than with review enabled. This is totally contrary to any logic. |
| *2 | The 5400 displays a "rough image" almost immediately after moving to another image in play mode, the time here is the time for the camera to load the full resolution image which it then applies over the rough image. You can't magnify an image until the full resolution image has been loaded. |
| *3 | All file sizes are an average of three files. As is the case with JPEG it's difficult to predict the size of an image because it will vary a fair amount depending on the content of the image (especially the amount of detail captured). For example, take a photograph of a fairly empty wall and you'll get a small JPEG, take a photograph of a bush with a lot of detail and you'll get a larger image. File sizes here are closer to the later, the larger size of file you should expect. |
| *4 | Camera estimation. |
Surprisingly the Coolpix 5400 turned out to have slower write performance than both the Coolpix 5000 and Coolpix 5700. Indeed it was one of the slowest we have reviewed recently. A write time of 6.8 seconds for a 2,400 KB file equates to 352 KB/sec (includes processing), very slow.
In addition to the Coolpix 5400's slow write speed it also has a pretty poor implementation of image buffering, this means that while the camera is writing images out of the buffer there are (a) certain features you can not access, (b) certain settings you can not change and (c) times at which the camera becomes unresponsive. Here's what we discovered:
To me this seems to be a processor related problem, the camera is trying to buffer 'in the background' but is having to use the same processor to perform several functions, when that is bogged down in the write process it can't be responsive to the user.
This poor buffering in combination with the slow write speed left the 5400 feeling sluggish and unresponsive, especially in a situation where you want to quickly take several shots with slightly different settings.
This
test is designed to measure the minimum amount of light under which the
camera can still focus. The focus target is our lens distortion test chart
(shown here on the right), camera is positioned exactly 2 m (6.6 ft) away.
Light levels are gradually dropped until the camera can no longer focus. This is carried out at both wide angle and telephoto zoom positions (as more light reaches the focusing systems with a larger aperture).
This test target is the optimum type of subject for most "contrast detect" AF systems (as it has a vertical line at its center), you should consider the results below the best you could expect to achieve.
| Lens position | AF Assist | Aperture | Lowest light focus |
| Wide angle (28 mm) | On | F2.8 | 4.7 EV (65 Lux, 6.04 foot-candle) |
| Telephoto (116 mm) | On | F4.6 | 4.7 EV (65 Lux, 6.04 foot-candle) |
Light intensity (Lux) = 2.5 x 2^EV (@ ISO 100), 10.76391 Lux = 1 foot-candle (fc)
Without an AF assist lamp the 5400 struggles to focus in anything but moderate light. It produced the same low light focus ability for both wide angle and telephoto. Why Nikon can't fit one of their high end 'prosumer' models with an AF lamp but can put one on the Coolpix SQ is beyond me.
We ran the camera through our new battery life test. This test is designed to be fair and comparative to each camera and battery type:
Batteries are fully discharged and recharged before the test and all cameras were reset to their factory default settings. Here are the results:
The Coolpix 5400 lasted well considering the relatively low capacity of its battery. Just breaking the three hour barrier and just over 300 shots, very good. Note that this is almost 30 minutes longer than the Coolpix 5000 it replaces.