
Leica Digilux 2 Review, Phil Askey, May 2004

Review based on a production Leica Digilux 2
On 1st December 2003 Leica announced the all new Digilux
2 digital camera. The five megapixel Digilux 2 has a unique 'retro' design
and style with an all metal case and rubber coating which look more like
an analogue film camera of the 1970's. The quality 28 - 90 mm equiv. F2.0
- F2.4 Leica lens has the appearance of a removable 35 mm lens (although
it is fixed to the camera body). The controls have a tactile response
and have been cleverly designed to be used in a fully automatic position
or an immediate manual setting.
Leica Digilux 2 vs. Panasonic DMC LC-1
The Leica Digilux 2 was developed in conjunction with Panasonic
who have their own version of the camera which has a black body with a
molded hand grip, some plastic controls, carries the Panasonic name but
is otherwise identical. The most amazing difference is the price, the
Panasonic being some $300 cheaper.

If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital
Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help
you understand some of the terms used).
|
Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based
on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review
before coming to your own conclusions.
Images which can be viewed
at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom
right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a
larger (typically VGA) image in a new window.
To navigate the review simply
use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section
either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the
navigation bar at the top.
DPReview calibrate their
monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted)
PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make
out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale
blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should
be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally
A,B and C.
|
 |
This article is Copyright 2004
Phil Askey and the review in part or in whole may NOT be reproduced in
any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.
For information on reproducing any part of this review (or any images)
please contact: Phil Askey
|