First of all it is worth remembering that this comparison was carried out with the G5 set at ISO 50, there is no way the G5 could keep noise down in the same way the EOS 300D does even at ISO 100 let alone higher sensitivities (see this page). It's clear to see the differences in image processing between the two, the G5's images have a harder more processed appearance with more visible artifacts and more visible noise. Color balance and tonal response are surprisingly similar, surprising unless you remember that both of these camera's feature Canon's "DiGiC" processor. In some crops the G5 does appear to be resolving more detail than the EOS 300D, that is an eye-opener in itself. Overall however I'm still comfortable in saying I prefer the EOS 300D image's D-SLR look to the G5's harder prosumer camera output.* * Note that it would be possible to get a little closer to the look of the EOS 300D image by reducing sharpening on the G5, although it only provides on step of adjustment. From: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/CanonEOS300D/ Item May Only be Printed for Home/Personal reference | |||||||||||||
| ©1998 - 2009 Digital Photography Review. http://www.dpreview.com/ | |||||||||||||