Previous page Next page

Software - RAW conversion

Supplied software

The biggest news feature-wise with the FZ8 is the inclusion of raw mode, something I would now class as essential if you don't like the heavy-handed approach to noise reduction taken by the Venus III processor. As with other Lumix models the camera ships with a special (fully featured) edition of SILKYPIX, a rather quirky, though surprisingly well-featured, raw development application for Windows and Mac. The (on-screen) manual is very comprehensive, but doesn't really explain the features very well, and first-time users may find themselves overwhelmed by the sheer volume of options on offer. This isn't helped by the slightly dodgy translations and the plethora of sliders with names that don't really indicate what they actually do. But there is lots here to get stuck into, and the default settings produce perfectly acceptable results (very similar to out of camera JPEGs).

But then, after a lot of experimentation (and a good read of the manual) you'll discover that the SILKYPIX can produce far superior results - and can be fine-tuned to produce output that suits your own needs / tastes. In fact there's much, much more tweaking on offer than you get with Adobe Camera Raw, for example, and compared to what you get with most cameras it's hard to complain. It is worth using SILKYPIX for the ability to control noise reduction alone.

You can save parameter sets (for some reason you put them in the 'cloakroom', but hey ho) once you've found out what works for you, which combined with batch processing and extensive output options (TIFF or JPEG), takes some of the grind out of the business of developing large numbers of raw files.

SILKYPIX has a comprehensive feature set, though the lack of any meaningful documentation (and occasionally incomprehensible menu options) mean it can take a while to really feel comfortable and to find your way around. It's not all hard work; drop down menus allow you to quickly choose presets for basic parameters (exposure, white balance, sharpness, tone, color and so on); a great starting place if you're new to the business of raw conversion.
The Color Mode menu offers presets that mimic different films (apparently 'Memory color 1 and 2' are designed to produce color that more closely matches how you remember the scene. Now that is clever). Dig a little deeper, beyond the presets, and SILKYPIX offers almost limitless tweaking opportunities, certainly enough to satisfy even the most advanced user. In fact you can easily end up spending way too long trying the different sliders....
There are comprehensive noise reduction options (NR gets five sliders of its own), though you'll need the manual to work out what does what (it's probably easier to just zoom in on the image and watch the effect each has on the preview). I must admit I had to reach for the manual when I reached this tab (whilst looking for the option to actually process the raw file and save a TIFF). Surprise surprise I was in the right place - this is where you 'develop' the raw files (and save your settings into the cloakroom, where they can be re-loaded for future images).

JPEG & RAW Resolution compared

Although the FZ8's JPEG resolution is very good there is a slight advantage to shooting raw. On the downside there's a bit of moiré at the very highest frequencies, but you're not going to see this in 'real world' shots, and the extra resolution (and control over noise reduction) will deliver real benefits in scenic shots containing foliage or other fine detail. Note that at the time of writing there is no support for the FZ8's raw files in Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) but it will no doubt eventually find its way into a future update.

As the crops below show the camera is by default applying quite a lot of sharpening during JPEG processing, and the raw files (using the default settings) look very soft by comparison - perfect for post-processing. You can increase the sharpness in SILKYPIX but - as shown below - the difference isn't great, and you're better off doing it in Photoshop later.

SILKYPIX RAW
RAW -> TIFF
Sharpness High
JPEG from camera SILKYPIX RAW
RAW -> TIFF (Default)

ISO 100 Studio shot comparison (default settings)

Using the SILKYPIX default settings produces output that has a similar 'feel' to the out-of-camera JPEG, though closer examination reveals a considerably less processed-looking image with considerably lower sharpening. The beauty of shooting raw is, of course, that you don't have to make do with the default settings, and it's an easy job to reduce the rather excessive saturation and contrast if you want to produce a more natural result, or one better suited to post-processing.

To get an idea how much work the VENUS III engine is having to do - even at ISO 100 - to combat the inevitable noise problem arising from cramming so many pixels onto such a small sensor we've also included below a crop from the same shot developed from raw with SILKYPIX's noise reduction options all set to their lowest settings. This would explain why even at the lowest ISO setting the out-of-camera JPEGs show obvious signs of NR artefacts if you look closely. Then again, unless you're producing huge enlargements or viewing - as here - at 100% / actual pixels - the JPEG output is pretty good.

SILKYPIX RAW -> TIFF (Default settings, manual WB)
ISO 100 studio scene 100% crops
SILKYPIX RAW -> TIFF (Minimum Noise Reduction)
ISO 100 studio scene 100% crops
JPEG out of camera , High quality setting (all settings default)
ISO 100 studio scene 100% crop

ISO 400 Studio shot comparison

At high ISO settings there's an awful lot of noise, and shooting raw allows you to make decisions about how much detail you're prepared to sacrifice in order to reduce the visible graininess. The camera's own approach is fairly unusual (and is the instantly recognizable visual signature of the Venus III processor) - the luminance detail is left almost untouched, whereas the chroma (color) information is blurred to the point where it looks like it's been painted on later. Using SILKYPIX allows you to control the amount of noise reduction and to preserve the final low contrast tonal detail / texture that is lost by the in-camera noise reduction (even using the low NR option). The crops below show the default output as well as an indication of the range of noise reduction available, from minimum to maximum.

SILKYPIX RAW -> TIFF (Default settings, manual WB)
ISO 400 studio scene 100% crops
SILKYPIX RAW -> TIFF (Minimum Noise Reduction)
ISO 400 studio scene 100% crops
SILKYPIX RAW -> TIFF (Maximum Noise Reduction)
ISO 400 studio scene 100% crops
JPEG out of camera , High quality setting (all other settings default)
ISO 400 studio scene 100% crop

ISO 1250 Studio shot comparison

Interestingly at very high ISO settings (ISO 800 and 1250) the raw output is so noisy that in most cases you're no worse off with JPEGs, as it is impossible to get as much luminance detail out of the raw files as the Venus III manages in-camera. Sure, the color information is all shot, but at least for low light social shots you're going to be able to recognize the people in the picture.

SILKYPIX RAW -> TIFF (Default settings, manual WB)
ISO 1250 studio scene 100% crops
SILKYPIX RAW -> TIFF (Minimum Noise Reduction)
ISO 1250 studio scene 100% crops
SILKYPIX RAW -> TIFF (Maximum Noise Reduction)
ISO 1250 studio scene 100% crops
JPEG out of camera , High quality setting (all other settings default)
ISO 1250 studio scene 100% crop
Previous page Next page

Comments

Roald46
By Roald46 (6 months ago)

You can find a VIDEO test of the LUMIX DMC-FZ72 here:
http://youtu.be/csSFrNPx2CI
Filmed in 1920 x 1080 50i

0 upvotes