Previous page Next page

Compared to... Panasonic DMC-FZ7

We'll start by looking at how well the FZ8 compares to the camera it replaces, the DMC-FZ7. We have included samples at each camera's lowest sensitivity setting (FZ8: ISO 100, FZ7: ISO 80) and ISO 400. See later in the review for the FZ8's higher ISO (ISO 800, 1250 and 3200) modes.

Studio scene comparison (FZ8 @ ISO 100, FZ7@ ISO 80)

  • Panasonic DMC-FZ8: Aperture Priority mode (F5.0), ISO 100, Default Image Parameters, Manual white balance, +0.33 EV compensation
     
  • Panasonic DMC-FZ7: Aperture Priority mode (F5.0), ISO 80, Default Image Parameters, Manual white balance, +0.7 EV compensation
     
  • Lighting: Daylight simulation, >98% CRI
Panasonic DMC-FZ8
Panasonic DMC-FZ7

ISO 100, 1/60 sec, F5.0

ISO 80, 1/60 sec, F5.0
3,241 KB JPEG
1,817 KB JPEG

Unsurprisingly there's very little difference at all between the FZ8 and its predecessor at the lowest ISO - and the extra megapixel gives a small resolution advantage. In general the edge-to-edge performance is excellent; the Leica-badged lens used on Panasonic's FZ series has always offered superb sharpness and contrast. Note that there is still a little of the corner softness in this, our second sample of the FZ8, but it is so mild as to be almost unnoticeable.

The output also looks a little cleaner than the FZ7, with less visible noise. This smoothness is, of course, a two-edged sword, as the Venus III noise reduction is also taking some of the texture of the scene away too. It's also worth noting that - though cleaner than the FZ7 - the output is still, if you look very closely, suffering from mild noise reduction artefacts (something much more visible when shooting scenes with lower lighting and less contrast).

Previous page Next page
11
I own it
0
I want it
16
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

Roald46

You can find a VIDEO test of the LUMIX DMC-FZ72 here:
http://youtu.be/csSFrNPx2CI
Filmed in 1920 x 1080 50i

0 upvotes