Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Review
Resolution Chart Comparison (JPEG and RAW)
Images on this page are of our standard resolution chart which provides for measurement of resolution up to 4000 LPH (Lines Per Picture Height). A value of 20 equates to 2000 lines per picture height. For each camera we use the relevant prime lens (the same one we use for all the other tests in a particular review). The chart is shot at a full range of apertures and the sharpest image selected. Studio light, cameras set to aperture priority (optimum aperture selected), image parameters default. Exposure compensation set to deliver approximately 80% luminance in the white areas.
What we want to show here is how well the camera is able to resolve the detail in our standard test chart compared to the theoretical maximum resolution of the sensor, which for the charts we shoot is easy to work out - it's simply the number of vertical pixels (the chart shows the number of single lines per picture height, the theoretical limit is 1 line per pixel). Beyond this limit (when talking about line pairs usually referred to as the Nyquist frequency) the sensor cannot faithfully record image detail and aliasing occurs.
This limit is rarely attained, because the majority of sensors are fitted with anti-aliasing filters. Anti-aliasing filters are designed to reduce unpleasant moiré effects, but in doing so, they also reduce resolution (the relative strength and quality of these filters varies from camera to camera). In theory though, a sensor without an AA filter, when coupled with a 'perfect' lens, will deliver resolution equal to its Nyquist limit. Therefore, even though it may be effectively unattainable with normal equipment in normal shooting situations, an understanding of a sensor's theoretical limit provides a useful benchmark for best possible performance. Nyquist is indicated in these crops with a red line.
On this page we're looking at both JPEG and Raw resolution. For a (more) level playing field we convert the latter using Adobe Camera Raw. Because Adobe Camera Raw applies different levels of sharpening to different cameras (this confirmed) we use the following workflow for these conversions:
- Load RAW file into Adobe Camera RAW (Auto mode disabled)
- Set Sharpness to 0 (all other settings default)
- Open file to Photoshop
- Apply a Unsharp mask tuned to the camera, in this case 100%, Radius 0.6, Threshold 0
- Save as a TIFF (for cropping) and as a JPEG quality 11 for download
|JPEG (4000 x 3000) 4.7MB||RAW (4000 x 3000) 3.0MB|
Despite high levels of sharpening in the camera JPEGS (there are distinct halos around the numbers for instance), they don't manage to show quite as much detail as the Adobe Camera Raw output. What the camera does achieve, though, is impressive suppression of moiré.
Overall the camera is capable of capturing an impressive level of detail but the JPEG engine doesn's always express it as well as it is with this high-contrast target. In low-contrast, similarly colored situations it doesn't always convey all the detail it's capturing.
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Specifications
- 3 Body & Design
- 4 Operation & Controls
- 5 Operation & Controls
- 6 Menus
- 7 Menus
- 8 Overall Operation and Performance
- 9 Noise and Noise Reduction
- 10 Resolution
- 11 Dynamic Range
- 12 Raw & Software
- 13 Photographic tests
- 14 Photographic tests
- 15 Movie Mode
- 16 Compared to (JPEG)
- 17 Compared to (Higher ISO)
- 18 Compared to (RAW)
- 19 Conclusion
- 20 Samples