Previous page Next page

Body & Design

The Lumix DMC-LX7 is a mid-sized camera made mostly of metal. Construction is solid, save for the usual flimsy door over the battery/memory card compartment (but what else is new). I'm not a huge fan of the rear dial, either, which feels cheap and does not turn smoothly. The redesigned grip make the camera easy to hold, and the most important controls are within easy reach of your fingers. There isn't a whole lot of space for your right thumb on the back of the camera, so be careful where you put it.

The LX7 is a compact camera with a lot of manual controls. When held in the right hand, the relatively substantial grip ensures a good hold, and the shutter button falls naturally under the index finger. The LX7's rear control dial falls under the thumb of the right hand, with the ND/Focus button a short stretch to the left.

One of the major selling points of the LX7 is its fast lens. When we say a lens is 'fast', it means that it lets in a lot of light, allowing for faster shutter speeds at lower sensitivities in low light situations. In other words, you get nicer-looking pictures in low light. In addition, the fast aperture range also allows for a better background blurring than your typical compact camera.

The focal range of the lens is 4.7 -17.7, which is equivalent to 24 - 90 mm (same as the LX5). The LX7's lens supports 37mm filters, though you'll need the optional filter adapter in order to use them. The LX7 uses the same Power OIS image stabilization system as its predecessor. This system reduces the risk of blurry photos, and it'll smooth out the 'shake' in your movies, as well. The LX7's OIS system does not have 'active' mode, however, which is used in some of Panasonic's other cameras for reducing extreme shake in videos.

Turning our attention to the rear of the LX7, its LCD display has double the resolution of the one on the DMC-LX5. For those who don't know camera specs off the top of their heads, that means that the resolution is now 920,000 dots. As you'd expect, everything on the LCD is very sharp. I found outdoor visibility to be quite good, and in low light the image on the screen brightens up nicely, so you can still see your subject.

Under that you'll find the four-way controller, which is surrounded by four more buttons. The four-way controller is used for menu navigation, and also offers direct controls for ISO, white balance, and the drive mode. The left directional button's function can be customized.

Aperture ring

Several current enthusiast compacts make use of a control dial concentric with the lens (as pioneered by Canon on its Powershot S90). However Panasonic has taken a slightly different approach; rather than using a modal, customisable control it's added a traditional-style aperture ring that covers F1.4 to F8, with detents at every third stop. This immediately makes the LX7 a more engaging camera to use than the LX5; rather than having to constantly click-in the rear dial to change its mode, you can now set the aperture directly and use the rear dial to control exposure compensation or the shutter speed.

This won't come as any surprise to experienced photographers, but because the LX7 has an exposure mode dial and a variable maximum aperture zoom lens, there are situations where the camera doesn't or can't use the aperture value set by the ring:

  • The aperture ring is only active when the camera is working in aperture priority or manual mode (we suspect many enthusiasts will use these most of the time anyway)
  • If the ring is set to an aperture larger than the maximum for the current focal length, the camera will shoot with the lens wide open (e.g. if the lens is zoomed to full tele, then the camera can only use F2.3 even if the aperture ring is at F1.4)

One knock-on effect of this behaviour is that if you have the aperture ring set to F1.4 and the lens zoomed to full telephoto, then rotating the ring four clicks has absolutely no effect (it goes from F1.4 to 2.2), and it's only beyond this that the setting will actually start to change. Some people might find this disconcerting and annoying, others probably won't mind at all.

The main disadvantage of having a ring dedicated to controlling aperture, of course, is that it becomes entirely redundant in program and shutter priority exposure modes, and can't be configured to operate anything else. In this respect, the customisable control rings on cameras like the Canon Powershot S100 are undoubtedly more versatile, as they can be set to control such things as shutter speed, ISO or stepped zoom. But again, whether this really matters is down to each photographer's personal preference.

Turning our attention back to the rear of the camera, I want to touch on a few of the features accessed via the four-way controller:

  • ISO (left direction): chose from Auto, Intelligent Auto (uses motion to set the sensitivity), and 80 - 6400 (expandable to 12800)
  • White balance (right direction): you'll find the usual presets (minus florescent), two custom slots, and the ability to set the WB by color temperature; each of the options can be fine-tuned, and you can also bracket for white balance
  • Drive (down direction): here are the burst modes (details later), self-timer, and AE bracketing (-3EV to +3EV range) options

The four surrounding buttons handle AE/AF lock, entering playback mode or the quick menu, and toggling the info displayed on the LCD. All in all, a very similar operating experience to the LX5.

Compared to the LX5

Comparing the LX7 to its predecessor, while there aren't many changes visible in the front view, the top view shows the new aperture ring and stereo microphones. Changes on the back include the use of a new accessory port, the addition of the ND filter/focus switch, and a 'flip' of the Display and Q. Menu buttons. What I'm getting at is that users of the LX5 (and previous models) should feel right at home on the LX7.

Images are close to scale and appear courtesy of Panasonic

The DMC-LX7 is slightly larger and heavier than its predecessor. How does it compare with other premium compacts? Find out in the chart below:

Camera Dimensions (W x H x D, excluding protrusions) Volume (bulk) Mass (empty)
Canon PowerShot S100 3.9 x 2.3 x 1.1 in. (99 x 58 X 28mm) 9.9 cu in. 173 g
Fujifilm X10 4.6 x 2.7 x 2.2 in. (117 x 68 x 56mm) 27.3 cu in. 330 g
Nikon Coolpix P310 4.1 x 2.3 x 1.3 in. (104 x 548 x 33mm) 12.3 cu in. 194 g
Olympus XZ-1 4.4 x 2.6 x 1.7 in. (112 x 66 x 43mm) 19.4 cu in. 244 g
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 4.4 x 2.6 x 1.8 in. (112 x 66 x 46mm) 20.6 cu in. 269 g
Samsung EX2F 4.4 x 2.5 x 1.1 in. (112 x 63 x 28mm) 12.1 cu in. 286 g
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 4.0 x 2.4 x 1.4 in. (101 x 61 x 35mm) 13.4 cu in. 213 g

The Lumix DMC-LX7 is one of the bulkier cameras in this group, but it's certainly not a large camera. While it probably won't fit in your jeans pocket, it will travel over your shoulder or in a small camera bag with ease.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 17
Miso Peru

Dissapointing image quality | Video realistic as a positive surprise.
- excellent 1080p video
- large aperture 1.4-2.3 Carl Zeiss lens - advantage indoors/low light
- external flash hot-shoe - for me very important taking pictures at the party
- compact size
- quite intelligent camera...HDR

- extremely low image quality when viewed 100%....though OK for web/email/social media
- aprox. 7mmx5mm small sensor, hence not surprised why low image quality and 1.4-2.3 aperture on the lens
- in video recording when turning the aperture ring or exposure dial the click are quite nosily recorded
-menu/set button would expect to get deeper inside of the menu instead menu/set takes you out of the menu....keep happening to me all the time.
- uncomfortable holding with right hand (I have a bit bulky hand)


Pixel peeping at 100% isn't where this camera is made for. I'm a full-time pro photographer and almost always have an older LX3+wide angle converter attached on it with me. Gets me near 18mm at 16:9 and still have f2.0 I shoot raw and got several frontpages with this combo.

It is not perfect, but playing around with the settings and shooting jpg+raw, these camera's still have their place.

1 upvote
Sir Corey of Deane

Miso Peru,

The first three words you wrote are rubbished by the review samples, and the fact that this is your only post on DPReview in three months, makes your screed pretty worthless.

The word "troll" springs to mind.


It is quite true that, when pixel peeping, images from the LX7 are not squeaky clean say above ISO 200. Other than that it is a pleasure to use and images are often better than what they would have been with a camera with a bigger sensor, but with a slower lens and slower operation.


Have this and other real slr's and this is fantastic camera bar none! 10 megapixel is fine to me. I can crop and always resize smaller anyway. Exceptional detail from that magic summicron leica lens. Really a great camera is all about the lens not the pixel count.

No regrets at all....


This was a great line of cameras for light travel for serious people.
I have a feeling they will to the same with GX series. If so, I jump panasonic ship.
I don't have time for goofy cameras. Olympus has shown some convictions so far.

Panasonic should go back to make just microwave oven and kitchen appliances.


The LX7 offers a lot of camera for its money! I liked it from the very beginning.

However, my comment emphasizes its robustness. I was careless enough to let it drop from about 7 m unto a stone floor. It survived! It fell on the left upper edge (where the flash pops out).There is a dent, and the cover warps out by less than a mm. The flash needs fingernail assistance to pop out. Apart from that, there is not the slightest flaw in the optical quality of the photographs. I am amazed!


My LX5 survived several bad incidents. I am sure my LX7 will do what it can to keep on ticking.


I've also got to give Panasonic some props. My LX7 also survived a nearly 2m fall onto a hardwood floor during a clumsy attempt to lift it from its shelf in a cabinet. I was horrified when it happened, certain that the camera was destroyed. But it powered right up and, aside from a slightly dented corner, hasn't skipped a beat. I've shot over 4000 images on it since the fall nearly a year ago with no problems. Credit the design, materials, and manufacturing.

As an aside, our Panasonic TS-5 rugged/waterproof camera also took a 1+m drop onto asphalt this past week when being passed between my wife and I. It also survived with just a couple scratches.

disraeli demon

Just upgraded to this from an LX3 and I'm loving it. Snappier all round, better noise control, faster burst rate and the combination of step zoom plus lens resume (resets the lens to the focal length it was at when the camera powered down) means I'm shooting much more in the middle of the range instead of slamming from full wide to full tele all the time.

(Plus, high-speed video at 720p!!!)

I did quite a bit of research before this upgrade, and while I was tempted by the rangefinder-style layout of the Fuji X20 (but too big for my taste and limited video) and the flip-out touch-screen of the Olympus XZ-2 (but there are stories of focussing issues and it lacks that high-speed video option) in the end, this was the one for me.

RP McMurphy

The door on my LX3 is long snapped off
v annoying

1 upvote

Dear Jeff Keller,
I really enjoy reading your reviews. BUT why do you keep harping on the allegedly 'flimsy' door of the battery/card compartment? I've been with the LX series since the LX3 and this door is totally adequate. Ok,when it's open it wobbles a bit,but it's normally closed and then it's perfectly ok.
Just treat it as you would treat the rest of the camera.
Of course,if you let your 5-year-old 'use' it,it will soon become flimsy...


I have to agree on this point. I've never had any issues with the door on my Panasonic cameras.

I guess it could be down to the fact I'm pretty regimented in how I change batteries/cards (I open the door, pop out the battery/card and close it again - makes sense to me not to leave a door open no matter how solidly built it is) but really as long as you don't travel round with it open I can't see how it could be a problem

Joseph Broz

The photo software that ships with the Lumix LX7 will not work with Windows 8. Does anyone know when Panasonic will fix this?


Unfortunately, Panasonic cannot fix the nightmare that is Windows 8.

Victor Stan

Windows 7 works good, why do people rush so early to new OS? It's common sense that it takes a minimum of 6 months for any OS to be polished. Well in the case of Microsoft it takes forever since they only make a new OS because they aren't able to fix their current one. But always wait at least half a year to jump the bandwagon man!


The only way to tolerate Windows 8 is to use the free app Classic Shell. Makes windows 8 work like windows 7 but better.

1 upvote
Total comments: 17