Previous page Next page


The E-M5 doesn't have a built-in flash but does come with a clip-on unit that connects via the hot-shoe and accessory port. This method of keeping body size down, while still offering a flash in the box has become fairly common in the mirrorless sector and your attitude towards it is likely to depend on how often you shoot flash - just the occasional bit of fill-flash and you probably won't mind throwing the clip-on unit in your pocket, but frequent users are likely to get frustrated with having to repeatedly clip it on, or risk it being knocked off. (The Olympus implementation does at least have a small catch mechanism to reduce the chances of the flash being knocked off as you walk around with it).

The clip-on flash can be used as a controller for Olympus' RC-branded infrared remote controlled flashguns, including the relatively small and affordable FL-300R, for more flexible lighting.

The flash performance is pretty good, considering how small the clip-on unit is. Exposure is good, resulting in pleasant skin tones. Obviously direct, on-board flash isn't the most flattering lighting but the E-M5's doing about as well as could be expected.

JPEG Sharpening/Noise Filter settings

With its last generation of cameras, Olympus appeared to have prioritized prints over on-screen viewing, when it came to choosing the default JPEG settings (not an unreasonable decision, since almost nobody makes a monitor capable of showing an entire 12MP image at 100% view). This involved quite a lot of noise reduction and subsequent sharpening, which wasn't the optimal setting for screen viewing.

The E-M5 takes a more moderate approach, with more subtle noise reduction and less exaggerated sharpening, at least at base ISO.

Here we show three of the sharpening levels offered by the E-M5, starting with the default, (0) level and also showing the minimum -2 setting.

As is often the case, careful sharpening of a RAW file generally yields the best results.

(ISO 200, 45mm F1.8, F3.5, Noise Filter Low)
JPEG, Sharpening = 0 (default)
JPEG, Sharpening -1
JPEG, Sharpening -2

At higher ISOs, the noise reduction (called Noise Filter on Olympus cameras), is more detrimental to image detail. For our tastes, particularly as the ISOs rise, we found we preferred setting the camera's Noise Filter to 'Off' and then dialing back the sharpening to -1, which gives a good level of detail at most settings, without then over-sharpening the additional noise you're leaving in the image.

Here we compare the default Noise Filter level (Standard) to turning it to the 'Off' position. We've also turned the sharpening down on the second image because the default sharpening tends to over-sharpen the noise.

(ISO 6400, 45mm F1.8, F1.8)
JPEG, Noise Filter = Standard, Sharpening = 0 (default)
JPEG, Noise Filter = Off, Sharpening = -1

Shadow Noise

The E-M5 is the first Olympus to push beyond using the rather dated 12MP Panasonic sensor and it appears to be a considerable step forward. Pushing the exposure in post-processing to see how much latitude there is for pulling detail out of the shadow regions shows there is more detail to be found without revealing excessive noise.

This scene has had the exposure pulled up by 3EV in Raw-processing, to show how noisy the shadow regions of the images are. Click on the left-hand images to view the full-size versions.
Olympus E-M5 - ACR+3.0EV (ACR NR: 0) - 100% crops
Sony NEX-5N Panasonic DMC GH2 Samsung NX200 Sony NEX-7

These images are all processed with noise reduction minimized in Adobe Camera Raw, so it's possible to clean these results up better than has been done here. Trying to push-process our dynamic range test shot shows the E-M5 is able to capture a similar range of tones in the shadows as the NEX-5N, suggesting it's not simply giving cleaner shadows by clipping to black sooner than the Sony.

The result is a big improvement - allowing greater flexibility in post-processing. However, for JPEG shooters, it should also mean that the clever Auto Gradation setting (a context-sensitive processing system that attempts to produce balanced images without damaging local contrast) can pull more information out of the shadows without introducing too much additional noise.

Gradation (Shadow Adjustment)

Here we've taken a shot where backlighting had confused the camera's meter and the subject was left slight under-exposed. Re-processing the image with Gradation set to 'Auto' attempts to pull detail out of the shadows, to offer a more balanced image. The result is a greatly improved picture, without excessive introduction of noise, as can be seen from the crop taken from the inside of the subject's hood at the lower left of the image.

Both images are based on a single Raw file shot at ISO 800, F2.8, 1/80th seconds using the Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN lens. Roll over the titles to switch between the two images.

Gradation Normal Gradation Auto

Overall image quality

The E-M5's image quality is impressive - whether giving punchy, attractive JPEGs or pretty clean, malleable Raw files. It's certainly a big step forwards for the Olympus's mirrorless cameras. The noise and dynamic range levels are a fraction behind the very latest APS-C sensors, if you analyze the images at a 1:1 level, but in most circumstances you simply won't notice. The Micro Four Thirds system now features a handful of useful and reasonably-priced fast prime lenses, which in concert with the E-M5's in-body IS means you'll often be able to shoot in low light without resorting to the camera's highest ISOs. Frankly, the quality of the camera's JPEGs and color rendition will outweigh any theoretical numeric differences between the E-M5 and its competitors for many people.

The price you pay for the E-M5's small size and small lenses is a a slightly smaller sensor than its APS-C peers. This can result in less light capturing ability at the same aperture and equivalent focal length, meaning a bit more noise in some situations. But, with the high quality of the E-M5's output (not to mention accessible bright lenses), it's not a trade-off with much of an impact in the final image. Even if you have the images printed beyond home-printing sizes, you're still unlikely to notice the compromise that you've theoretically made.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 12

Hello, is there anyone who would like to share video-film experiences about Olympus Om-T E M5? how is the possibilities to make short fiction and dokumantaires film and especially with different cinematic lenses in work..?


I have been using the OM-D EM5 for two years now, as a hobbyist, and it has brought the joy back for me in photography. A beautiful, light, strong camera, easy to use and produces great pictures. However, I have had a few niggles - the rubber eye-cup has come off both bodies I own, as well as the dial cap on the right hand side. In one body, the mode dial keeps switching between Auto and SCN. Olympus needs to look into these and some other flaws mentioned by users.


Great camera for travel and I have owned the OM-D E-M5 for already 3 weeks. I love the retro stye of it as it remind me of the OM4 which I still own.

Do note that the Lumix 20mm f:1.7 lens is not 100% comparable with the OM-D E-M5 when you leave the switch ON and the camera goes into sleep mode. It hang, Sometime It cannot wake up when you press the shutter button, you need to reset the camera by removing the battery for it to reset. Even when you OFF and ON back the switch is of no good.

1 upvote
Henry Richardson

That was an early problem with the E-M5 and 20mm, but was fixed in a 2012 firmware update. I had the problem back then until the firmware was fixed and then no more problems.


It is the only one listed in the camera feature search with a viewfinder as waterproof,but it appears to be only weather resistant, ie don't dunk it in water(or clipped to your life jacket while whitewater kayaking).


OLUMPUS OMDE5 appears to be an interesting camera - I am specially attracted to its weathersealed body and lens ( which I think is very essential in a country like I NDIA) - that was the reason why I had purchased PENTAX K10D years ago. One thing which is bothering me is its made in China tag. I am an architect and basically interested in landscape and nature photography - I travel a lot . Can I am have some inputs from those who are using OLYMPUS OMD E5?

Comment edited 34 seconds after posting

As a hobbyist, I have been using OMD EM5 for more than an year now and I love it. Here are some of my clicks. There are mostly landscapes and outdoors sports shots.


I recently got E-M5 and very happy with it. By no means I'm pro photographer but with my new 12-40mm F2.8 Pro lens is great combat and have been talking great picture. I use Toshiba Flash Air to use with my iPhone/ipad too. I mostly to landscape photos and it has not let me down.

1 upvote

It is an excellent little shooter.
THe EVF is quite good and KILLS OVFs in low light. THese were taken with one ..


The CaNIKSon shooters told me that they got VERY few 'keeper' pics with their FF sensors. I get a few 'looks' while shooting, but they soon shut up when RESULTS are compared.

Anywhere it's really dark, you'll appreciate being able to SEE.

I also own the EM-1 and have yet to put it through its DIM light paces.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
1 upvote
Chad Hogan

I'm on the hunt for a new camera and weighing up my options just now.. I'm fairly new to the game though and a bit naive in all honesty! Is the EM5 much better than the Canon EOS 7D as this comparison...

suggests? What features make this camera great and what one would you go for?

Thanks, Chad

Comment edited 14 seconds after posting
1 upvote

Hi, I didn't see any answer yet, so I asume nobody saw your post yet. I'll try to help you (maybe you didn't choose yet). This comparison isn't very good in my opinion (for example, it compares 9 fps vs 8, but you have to take in account that is with fixed focus. With continuous focus is much slower and less accurate...). I had a 60 D (same sensor, and image quality as the 7D with different features) and I have now the EM-5. I can tell you it has some advantages (if you think smaller and cheaper very good lenses are important advantages; for me, it is essential), but you will have to sacrifice some speed and easyness of handling. The best way is to read the full review of both cameras and to determine what are YOUR priorities. Don't forget to look at the sample images, as the two cameras have different outputs and it's important if you don't like to spend time in post processing. You will find very nice and helpfull reviews on this site (in my opinion, one of the best). Good luck!


I sold my 7D and lots of expensive L glass after buying the E-M5. The E-M5 is much smaller, it's images are sharper (no anti-aliasing filter), while the 7D has a very strong anti-aliasing filter (much stronger than any of the other Canon cameras with 18MP sensors) and the E-M5 has more dynamic range. It's also not nearly as prone to banding as the 7D is when pulling details from shadows. The 7D is a bit more ergonomic, but it's much larger, and it's lenses are significantly larger. And the reason i sold it is because it's so heavy. The E-M5 is very fast focusing, but for indoor sports (subjects moving towards or away from the camera) the 7D wins. Both cameras are metal bodied and weather sealed. Both have 4 channel, 3 group remote flash triggering. The E-M5 also has tilt screen and touch screen (touch point to focus and take image.)

Total comments: 12