Previous page Next page

Resolution Chart Comparison (JPEG)

Shots here are of our 'version two' resolution chart which provides for measurement of resolution up to 4000 LPH (Lines Per Picture Height). A value of 20 equates to 2000 lines per picture height. For each camera the relevant prime lens was used. The chart is shot at a full range of apertures and the sharpest image selected. Studio light, cameras set to aperture priority (optimum aperture selected), image parameters default. Exposure compensation set to deliver approximately 80% luminance of white area.

Olympus E-620 (6.4 MB, 12.3 MP) Canon EOS 500D (4.4MB, 15.1 MP)
Nikon D5000 (3.5 MB; 12.3 MP) Panasonic DMC-G1 (2.6 MB, 10.1 MP)

Olympus E-620 Canon EOS 500D
Nikon D5000 Panasonic DMC-G1

Olympus E-620 Canon EOS 500D
Nikon D5000 Panasonic DMC-G1

Olympus E-620 Canon EOS 500D
Nikon D5000 Panasonic DMC-G1

Measurable results

Camera Measurement
Olympus E-620 Horizontal LPH 2200  * 2550 
Vertical LPH 2150  * 2550 
Nikon D5000 Horizontal LPH 2200  * 2650 
Vertical LPH 2100  *2600 
Canon EOS 500D Horizontal LPH 2350  * 3400 
Vertical LPH 2300  * 2650 
Panasonic DMC-G1 Horizontal LPH 2350  2700 
Vertical LPH 2300  2550 

* Moiré is visible
+ Chart maximum
LPH Lines per Picture Height (to allow for different aspect ratios the measurement is the same for horizontal and vertical)
Absolute resolution Point at which all lines of a resolution bar are still visible and defined, beyond this resolution loss of detail occurs (below Nyquist frequency).
Extinction resolution Detail beyond camera's definition (becomes aliased)

The E-620's does a good job of eking out all the detail its sensor can capture - as we'll see on the next page, unlike the other cameras here, there's little resolution advantage to shooting RAW. It does a good job of staying competitive with the other cameras here, which is something that recent E-System Olympus cameras have struggled with.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums



Worst camera I ever bought.