Previous page Next page

Compared to...

Studio scene comparison (RAW)

See previous page for RAW workflow.

This is our standard studio scene comparison shot. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F). Camera settings as per previous pages.

Olympus E-420 (RAW) vs. Nikon D60 (RAW)

Olympus E-420 (RAW)
Nikon D60 (RAW)
2,615 KB JPEG (3648 x 2736)
3,354 KB JPEG (3872 x 2592)

While on the Olympus shooting in RAW doesn't give you any significant image quality advantage over out-of-cam JPEGs the Nikon RAW image offers clearer detail and edge definition than its out-of-camera JPEG counterpart. After eliminating all in-camera processing influences it becomes obvious that the Nikon captures a greater amount of detail at the sensor level.

Previous page Next page
52
I own it
0
I want it
48
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

AARTHu

I bought this oldie digital as a first experience vith digital cameras, even still use film mainly. So may it was a wrong decision, but I stay beside classic film photography. This camera slow, cheap and only manual mode able to firing promptly. I missed such a moments just because it wait so much before release the shutter. The lens as it is, so far from my zeiss with contax 35mm. Obviously nonsense to compare 66 rolleiflex images. There are lots of set up features, but practically takes long time to modify them, which disturb so much the picture taking. The CF card door a slim plastic door, very fragile. The viewfinder very small. All around this model are far away any real reflex cameras, it seems who design it just never take pictures with a proper camera. I can not recommend this camera, better to smash them all in the name of photography.

1 upvote