Previous page Next page

Compared to...

As with the majority of our studio image quality comparisons we selected the nearest competition by category, specification, price and feature set. In this case the Olympus E-410 goes up against Nikon's new compact ten megapixel D40X and the Canon EOS 400D (Rebel XTi).

Camera Kit price Kit lens
equiv. FOV
Sensor
(effective pixels)
Olympus E-410 $799 28 - 84 mm equiv. 10.0 MP LiveMOS; 17.3 x 13 mm (4/3 format)
Nikon D40X $799 27 - 82.5 mm equiv. 10.2 MP CCD; 23.7 x 15.6 mm (1.5x crop)
Canon EOS 400D $799 28.8 - 88 mm equiv. 10.1 MP CMOS; 22.2 x 14.8 mm (1.6x crop)

Lenses used

For direct comparisons we always use sharp prime lenses stopped down, typically to F9 for 35 mm lenses and F6.3 for Four Thirds lenses. Here we have used the Nikon 50 mm F1.8 (it's sharper than the F1.4 at F9), Olympus 50 mm F2.0 Macro, and Canon EF 50 mm F1.4.

Studio scene comparison (Noise Filter on/off)

This is our standard studio scene comparison shot taken from exactly the same tripod position. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F).

Olympus E-410 (default) vs. Olympus E-410 (NF Off)

Camera settings:

  • Olympus E-410: Olympus 50 mm F2.0 lens, Aperture Priority, ISO 100
    JPEG Large/SHQ, Manual WB, Anti-shock 2 sec
Olympus E-410
Olympus E-410 (NF Off)
6,775 KB JPEG (3648 x 2736)
6,810 KB JPEG (3648 x 2736)

Here you can see the difference between the default 'out of the camera' result and the same shot with the Noise Filter parameter set to 'Off' (and Sharpness -2 to compensate for the reduced need to sharpen). The improvement is clear to see, with the veil of the noise reduction algorithm removed the true detail and sharpness of the captured image is revealed. Obviously the downside of turning off the Noise Filter is more visible noise, especially from ISO 800 up*.

Because of the improvement between the default and this, our 'optimum', we have chosen to include it (as well as the default) in the JPEG comparisons on following pages (which is fair because the ability to control noise reduction is something all manufacturers could implement).

* We would of course have prefered it if Olympus had tuned the camera to deliver the optimum sharpness / detail throughout the ISO range and as can be seen here it's too high at ISO 100 which is leading to a loss of sharpness.

Previous page Next page
26
I own it
1
I want it
38
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments