Resolution Chart Comparison
Shots here are of the PIMA/ISO 12233 standard resolution
test chart (more of which are available in our comparison
database). This resolution chart allows us to measure the actual performance
of the lens and sensor system. It measures the ability of the camera to
resolve lines at gradually higher resolutions and enables us to provide
a definitive value for comparison purposes. Values on the chart are 1/100th
lines per picture height. So a value of 15 equates to 1500 lines per picture
height. For each camera the relevant 50 mm prime lens was used (Olympus
50 mm F2.0, Canon 50 mm F1.4, Nikkor 50 mm F1.4). The chart is shot at
a full range of apertures and the sharpest image selected.
Studio light, cameras set to auto, all settings factory
default. Aperture selected for optimum sharpness. Exposure compensation
+0.7 EV to +1.3 EV.
 |
 |
| Olympus E-1 |
Canon EOS-10D |
 |
 |
| Nikon D2H |
Fujifilm S2 Pro (6 mp size) |
 |
 |
| Olympus E-1 |
Canon EOS-10D |
 |
 |
| Nikon D2H |
Fujifilm S2 Pro (6 mp size) |
 |
 |
| Olympus E-1 |
Canon EOS-10D |
 |
 |
| Nikon D2H |
Fujifilm S2 Pro (6 mp size) |
 |
 |
| Olympus E-1 |
Canon EOS-10D |
 |
 |
| Nikon D2H |
Fujifilm S2 Pro (6 mp size) |
 |
 |
| Olympus E-1 |
Canon EOS-10D |
 |
 |
| Nikon D2H |
Fujifilm S2 Pro (6 mp size) |
Measurable findings (three measurements taken for each camera):
| Camera |
Measurement |
Absolute Res. |
Extinction Res. |
| Olympus
E-1 |
Horiz LPH |
* 1400 |
* 1700 |
| Vert LPH |
* 1250 |
* 1650 |
| 5° Diagonal LPH |
* 1000 |
n/a |
| Canon
EOS-10D |
Horiz LPH |
1600 |
1900 |
| Vert LPH |
1450 |
1850 |
| 5° Diagonal LPH |
1000 |
n/a |
| Nikon D2H |
Horiz LPH |
1400 |
* 1600 |
| Vert LPH |
1200 |
* 1550 |
| 5° Diagonal LPH |
1000 |
n/a |
Fujifilm
S2 Pro
(6.1 mp) |
Horiz LPH |
1650 |
1900 |
| Vert LPH |
1400 |
1850 |
| 5° Diagonal LPH |
1000 |
n/a |
Definition of terms:
| LPH |
Lines per Picture
Height (to allow for different aspect ratios the measurement is
the same for horizontal and vertical) |
| 5° Diagonal |
Lines set at
5° diagonal |
| Absolute Resolution |
Still defined
detail (below Nyquist frequency*) |
| Extinction
Resolution |
Detail beyond
camera's definition (becomes a solid gray alias) |
| n/a |
Not Available
(above the capability of the test chart) |
| n/v |
Not Visible
(not visible on test results) |
* Nyquist frequency defined as the
highest spatial frequency where the sensor can
still faithfully record image detail. Beyond the Nyquist frequency aliasing
occurs
The measurements on the ISO 12233 resolution chart are
given in lines per picture height, because of the difference in aspect
ratio between the E-1 and the others the E-1 actually has approximately
the same number of vertical lines captured as the rest. The E-1 has 1920
vertical lines, the EOS-10D 2048 (6% more), the D2H 1632 (15% less) and
the S2 Pro (6mp) 2016 (5% more). Hopefully the diagram shown at the bottom
of this page will help to demonstrate this point.
The assessment made in our review of the 'initial production'
camera stands: The E-1's performance should be somewhere near to the EOS
10D or S2 Pro, unfortunately it doesn't appear to actually get there,
exhibiting less resolution and an earlier extinction point (where detail
is just blurred). This could perhaps be down to the use of a very strong
LPF (Low Pass Filter), but that wouldn't explain the moiré visible
from approximately 800 LPH onwards.
Aspect Ratio vs. Vertical Resolution
E-1 resolution vs. prosumer 2/3" CCD digital camera
While nobody would consider the Sony DSC-F717 instead of an E-1 it is
certainly an interesting comparison to make, especially considering how
much smaller the 2/3" type five megapixel sensor is than the E-1's
4/3" type. It's worth noting the Sony's strong halo sharpening artifacts
but also an almost complete lack of moiré or interpolation artifacts.
| Olympus E-1 |
Sony DSC-F717 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Digg
del.icio.us
Reddit
Google
Please wait, fetching latest prices.