
Compared to... (contd.)
Colour Chart Comparison
Now we can compare the C-3040Z to a few of other cameras,
using samples from our test archives we will now compare its image quality
to the Nikon Coolpix 990, Canon PowerShot G1 and Sony DSC-S75.
Colour charts are shot in daylight, Auto White Balance,
EV compensation +0.3 (all cameras), measured light ~10 EV.
 |
 |
| Olympus C-3040Z |
Nikon Coolpix 990 |
 |
 |
| Canon PowerShot G1 |
Sony DSC-S75 |
The C-3040Z produces more neutral results from our colour patches, closer
to those seen from the Nikon Coolpix 990, though slightly less saturated
(blue and green suffering the most). The lead in this comparison is once
more taken by the Sony DSC-S75 closely followed by Canon's 'cooler' G1.
We're only measuring colour below. RGB values below were
taken from a VGA reduced image (to average colours and eliminate JPEG
artifacts) using the Eyedropper tool in Photoshop with a 5 by 5 Average
Sample Size.
| |
Olympus
C-3040Z
|
Nikon
Coolpix
990 |
Canon
PowerShot
G1 |
Sony
DSC-S75 |
| Patch White |
201,202,201 |
201,201,201 |
214,208,208 |
193,195,194 |
| |
|
|
|
| Middle Gray |
102,102,100 |
104,104,104 |
97,96,102 |
90,94,95 |
| |
|
|
|
| Patch Red |
195,29,36 |
223,52,58 |
186,33,53 |
205,0,26 |
| |
|
|
|
| Patch Green |
8,136,61 |
5,149,63 |
26,149,73 |
34,138,34 |
| |
|
|
|
| Patch Blue |
41,33,84 |
60,50,112 |
55,49,117 |
31,24,152 |
| |
|
|
|
Red Channel Noise
Something we noticed early on with the current crop of
3 megapixel cameras was a certain amount of noise in the red channel,
even at normal shutter speeds. This was most visible in the light blue
of skies or painted walls. Our colour patch test chart turned out to be
a good "leveller" and a way to measure the performance of one
camera to the next.
The samples below are of 40 x 40 blocks cropped from
the colour comparison charts above of the Blue and Cyan patches, each
block is then broken down into it's red green and blue channels and reflected
as such directly below.

Resolution Comparison
Shots here are of the PIMA/ISO 12233 standard resolution
test chart (more available for comparison in our comparison database).
Studio light, cameras set to auto, Exposure compensation +0.7 EV for all
cameras. How to read the charts: All values are 1/100 th lines/picture
height/width. So the "10" value equates to 1000.
 |
 |
| Olympus C-3040Z |
 |
 |
| Nikon Coolpix 990 |
 |
 |
| Canon PowerShot G1 |
 |
 |
| Sony DSC-S75 |
Measurable findings (three measurements taken for each camera):
| Camera |
Measurement |
Absolute Res. |
Extinction Res. |
Olympus
C-3040Z |
Horiz LPH |
1000* |
1300 |
| Vert LPH |
1000* |
1350 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
900* |
n/a |
Nikon
Coolpix 990 |
Horiz LPH |
900 |
1300 |
| Vert LPH |
900 |
1400 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
900 |
n/a |
Canon
PowerShot G1 |
Horiz LPH |
950* |
1300 |
| Vert LPH |
950* |
1400 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
900* |
n/a |
Sony
DSC-S75 |
Horiz LPH |
1050 |
1400 |
| Vert LPH |
1050 |
1500 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
1000 |
n/a |
* Strong moiré is visible
Definition of terms:
| LPH |
Lines per Picture Height (to allow
for different aspect ratios the measurement is the same for horizontal
and vertical) |
| 5o Diagonal |
Lines set at 5o diagonal |
| Absolute Resolution |
Still defined detail (below Nyquist
frequency*) |
| Extinction Resolution |
Detail beyond camera's definition
(becomes a solid gray alias) |
| n/a |
Not Available (above the capability
of the test chart) |
| n/v |
Not Visible (not visible on test
results) |
* Nyquist frequency defined as the highest spatial frequency
where the CCD can still faithfully record
image detail. Beyond the Nyquist frequency aliasing occurs.
About what we'd expected, the C-3040Z with its new lens
is now slightly sharper than Canon's G1 and the Nikon Coolpix 990, indeed
it's getting close to the Sony DSC-S75's ultra-sharp resolution, however
at these high frequencies its clear to see moiré patterns in the
resolution chart.
|