PIX 2015
Previous page Next page

Color reproduction

Here you can see a generated GretagMacbeth ColorChecker chart, place your mouse over any of the labels below it to see the color reproduction in that mode. Select a camera/setting combination from the 'Compared to' drop-down to comparative boxes inside each patch.

Nikon has harmonized the default image parameters across its line of 'serious' DSLRs and therefore it's not a surprise that the D700 produces color that is pretty much identical to the D3 (the slight difference you can see are down to contrast and saturation, not hue). It's also very similar to the D300 but the tone curves used in-camera mean the D300 offers slightly lighter skin tones and pastel colors than the D700.

Nikon D700 Compare to:  

Artificial light White Balance

The D700's automatic white balance performance in artificial light is not exactly impressive. In fact many compact cameras do a better job. It's also fairly similar to the D300's performance which suggests Nikon opted to implement D300 (rather than D3) parameters on the D700. The built-in presets are slightly better but still far from perfect. If white balance is crucial to your photography under artificial light you'll either have to use a gray-card and fine-tune the presets or use manual white balance straightaway. The latter actually works very well and is reliable and consistent.

Incandescent - Auto WB
Red: 11.4%, Blue: -22.7%, Poor
Incandescent - Incandescent preset WB
Red: 7.8%, Blue: -14.3%, Poor
Fluorescent - Auto WB
Red: 6.4%, Blue: -16.2%, Poor

Fluorescent - Fluorescent preset WB
Red: 5.2%, Blue: 5.4%, Average

Long Exposure noise reduction / Night shots

As we would expect in 2008 from a serious DSLR our 30 second 'night shot' exposure produced no hot pixels, even with noise reduction turned off.

Noise reduction Off Noise reduction On
ISO 200, 30 sec, F18 ISO 200, 30 sec, F18
(100% crops)


Nikon decided to integrate a flash into the D700's prism which means, due to limited space, the viewfinder is slightly smaller than the D3's (Nikon's flagship does not feature a built-in flash). An onboard-flash can come in handy in many situations though and on the D700 it does a good job. Metering is good and there is no color-cast. The D700 uses i-TTL metering for internal (and external if compatible) flash and also supports Nikon's advanced wireless flash system (Creative Lighting System).

Direct flash Direct Flash

Overall Image Quality / Specifics

From an image quality point of view the D700 does exactly what most people would have expected and produces excellent output that is very similar to the D3’s. At low sensitivities the D700’s image results are very clean, virtually noise- and artifact-free and look pleasantly ‘unprocessed’. If you prefer a crisper, more consumer-friendly look to your images there’s more than enough latitude for fine-tuning the sharpness, contrast and saturation settings – either in-camera or in post processing.

It’s probably worth mentioning that while, depending on subject and lighting, the D700’s results can be virtually indistinguishable from the D3's, the new model comes with a default tone curve that is, especially in the highlights, slightly steeper which can result in clipped highlights. You can keep this under control by adjusting the default settings but if you want to get the maximum out of the camera your best bet is, as usual, shooting RAW. The D700 offers an enormous, almost five stop RAW headroom that allows you to even pull back highlight detail that has been blown out beyond recognition.

While the D700’s output at low sensitivities certainly does not leave a lot to complain about it’s also fair to say that you can get similar results out of an APS-C SLR with a comparable resolution such as the Nikon D300. It’s at higher sensitivities (800 and above) where the D700 is at its most impressive and beats the competition in its class by a mile (or two). This is a combination of the superb light-gathering capabilities of the huge photosites on the D700’s full frame sensor and Nikon’s very sensible approach to noise reduction which is quite heavy-handed on chroma noise (color blotches) and much more lenient on luminance noise (grain).

Of course, at anything over ISO 3200 you’ll still have to accept a clearly visible deterioration in image quality but like the D3 the D700 delivers usable results up to ISO 12800 which means you can keep on shooting when light levels have dropped to a point where most other cameras would simply throw the towel.

One feature that I should probably mention in this section is the D700's Chromatic Aberration reduction function. It removes chromatic aberration in your images pretty efficiently and is the same system that is being used in the D300 and D3. If you'd like to see some samples have a look at our Nikon D3 review.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums
We are retrieving offers for your location, please refresh the page to see the prices.


Total comments: 11
Ahsan khn

hey ...i jst got a new nikon d700 and i m a newly user of this camera so tell me about a photography of this camera


I Just Got A D700 For A Replacement For My D200, £854 With 3,000 Actuations. From WEX Photographic.

1 upvote

@ zakk9:

what is it with telephoto long lenses,btw.


i guess that would be a good buy,with only under 1700 shutter count,lens and the battery grip. had it been here in my place,i'm gonna get it.


No problem with long telephoto lenses, and I expressed myself a bit clumsily. What I meant was that a crop sensor, like the one in the D300 (which I also have) gives more reach at the same pixel count. The D300/700 combination is very convenient, since the two cameras share more or less the same body and use the same CF cards, batteries and vertical grip.


does anyone here know the shutter actuation of the d700? i'm considering buying a used one with 39,000 shutter count for 900 euros.is it a good buy for a 39k count?


I think they are rated for 150,000.. So 39k is not that bad. Just bought one with 38K for $1300


I've used this camera for many photo shoots for over 2 years and still have it as my backup camera. (My main one is the D4). If you don't care about video, this is the camera for you! Much better than the D600 and probably very similar to the D800 (though the D800 has way too large image files for most shooters.). The images from the D700 with the right Nikkor lenses will keep you very happy for many years! (I only switched to the D4 for it's low light ability and faster shooting speed.)

1 upvote

I have been looking for a replacement camera for my D40 and in my research discovered the D700. I can now get a used one in perfect condition with less than 1700 shots taken plus grip and lens (waiting to hear which lens) for 890 Euros. Would you say this is a better option than a Fuji X-E1 or Olympus OM-D E-M5 in terms of usability and image quality? I am looking for a camera to take stock photos with.


The D700 is an excellent camera if you don't need video or long telephoto lenses. It's particularly ideal if you want to use wide aperture primes and play with shallow depth of field. When it comes to image quality, it's a 5 year old camera, and many of the smaller sensors approach the once unique qualities of the D700 (I use a Panasonic GH3 in addition to the D700 myself). There are no obvious choices, and it mostly boils down to the user experience. Do you prefer an OVF or an EVF? Are you ok with a camera that is twice as heavy? The rational choices nowadays are probably a mirrorless camera, but the D700 is a classic. They are all good :)


I have just brought a D700, please can someone help with the mind field of lenses!! do I need FX lenses?
Thanks in advance

Son Of Waldo

Excellent review!

Total comments: 11