Previous page Next page

Compared to...

Studio scene comparison (RAW)

See previous page for RAW conversion notes.

This is our standard studio scene comparison shot taken from exactly the same tripod position. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F). Camera settings as per previous pages.

Nikon D300 (RAW) vs. Olympus E-3 (RAW)

Nikon D300 (RAW)
Olympus E-3 (RAW)
3.7 MB JPEG (4288 x 2848)
2.8 MB JPEG (3648 x 2736)

As we have noted previously the E-3's RAW converted images actually look less sharp than JPEG, this is probably down to a stronger anti-alias filter which is compensated for by the camera processor with more sharpening. Using this comparison we can surmise that the D300 has a much lighter anti-alias filter which makes it easier to extract detail (less sharpening is required) with the compromise of potentially visible moire (although none is visible here).

Previous page Next page
739
I own it
10
I want it
425
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments