
Main LCD display
 |
The 995's rear LCD appears to be the same unit used on the 990.
While good in itself it's no match for the much brighter LCD's used
on (say) Sony or Canon digital cameras.
Nikon still haven't listened to us reviewers or owners, there's
STILL no anti-reflective coating over the LCD... Sorry, but there's
no excuse and for this Nikon lose points.
There's plenty of information provided on the LCD, which is covered
later in this review.
|
The 995's LCD provides a frame coverage of 98% horizontally and 96% vertically
(or approx. 2010 x 1482 pixels), anchored at the bottom left corner of
the frame.

Viewfinder
The 995's viewfinder is the same disappointing "optical
tunnel" we find on so many compact digital cameras. On the positive
side, it does have a dioptre adjustment, central focus area / metering
area brackets and parallax correction lines (which indicate the top corner
of the frame at close focus distances). The 995's viewfinder provides
only 82% frame coverage (approx. 1690 x 1268 pixels).
The lights beside the viewfinder indicate:
 |
Flash ready |
 |
Flash recommended (shake warning) |
 |
Flash charging |
AF |
Focus good, ready to shoot |
AF |
Focus bad, cannot auto focus |
AF |
Taking photo |
AF |
Digital zoom |
AF |
3:2 Recording size |

Battery Compartment
The Coolpix 880 was the first Coolpix digital camera
not to use AA batteries, it instead used 2CR5 Lithium or Nikon's own EN-EL1
Lithium-Ion rechargeable (which was an option for the 880). So it wouldn't
have been difficult of us to predict that this was a chosen path for Nikon,
and indeed the 995 follows this trend, it takes the EN-EL1 Lithium-Ion
rechargeable (supplied with the camera) or the 2CR5 "standard"
Lithium battery. The compartment is therefore a different shape than the
990 giving the hand grip a flatter profile.

Battery and Charger
As I mentioned above, the 995 is supplied with the MH-50
battery charger (input 100-240 VAC, 50/60 Hz) and one EN-EL1 Lithium-Ion
rechargeable battery which is rated as 7.4 V 650 mAh (4.8 Wh). It will
be interesting to see how well the 995 lasts on this battery, which only
provides about 60% of the power of comparable rechargeable batteries,
especially considering that the 995 isn't much different than last year's
990 which required a good set of NiMH to have any lasting power.
| Battery |
Camera* |
Type |
Output
(V / mAh) |
Power
(Wh) |
Weight |
| Canon NB-1L |
IXUS 300 |
Li-Ion |
3.7 V 680 mAh |
2.5 Wh |
28 g (1.0 oz) |
| Fujifilm NP-80 |
6800Z |
Li-Ion |
3.7 V 1100 mAh |
4.1 Wh |
? |
| Nikon EN-EL1 |
995 |
Li-Ion |
7.4 V 650 mAh |
4.8 Wh |
43 g (1.5 oz) |
| 4 x AA GP NiMH 1600 |
990 |
NiMH |
4.8 V 1600 mAh |
7.7 Wh |
105 g (3.7 oz) |
| Canon BP-511 |
G1 |
Li-Ion |
7.4 V 1100 mAh |
8.1 Wh |
76 g (2.7 oz) |
| Sony NP-FM50 |
DSC-S75 |
Li-Ion |
7.2 V 1200 mAh |
8.6 Wh |
76 g (2.7 oz) |
* Camera is listed as an example, this battery may also be used in other
models
Looking at the table above it should be fairly clear
that you'll almost definitely need a spare EN-EL1 in your camera bag (we'll
test this later). The camera can also optionally take the fairly widely
available 2CR5 Lithium non-rechargeable battery (image on the right below).

Compact Flash compartment
The Compact Flash compartment on the 995 is different
from that found on the 990 in several respects. First, it's located further
forward in the side of the camera. Secondly, cards are inserted with their
front to the front of the camera ("finger lip" to the back -
something we requested in our 990 review) and probably most significantly,
it's now Type II compatible, that means it's 5 mm across compared to the
3.3 mm of a Type I slot it can take either Type I or Type II cards.
There's currently a bit of confusion about whether the
995 is Microdrive compatible or not, some Nikon literature clearly says
"NOT compatible with the IBM Microdrive". Verbally however we've
been told that it is compatible only with the newer 512 MB or 1 GB Microdrives
(the "MK II" drives). So far we've deliberately used a 1 GB
drive almost exclusively in the camera to attempt to ascertain reliability,
and so far I'm happy to report that we've had no problems.
One slightly concerning detail is that Nikon appear to
have stuck to the same plastic door mechanism and retention clip. This
clip broke on our 990 within a few weeks, and although I haven't seen
this problem widely reported, it is the single "cheapest" component
in the overall camera design and probably the first to fail.
|