Conclusion - Pros
Conclusion - Cons
Overall conclusionUnlike Canon, whose PowerShot G7 is a real 'statement' camera that has undisguised aspirations to be a genuine SLR replacement, Nikon has taken a much more cautious step towards a truly serious high end compact with it's new flagship model. The P5000 - Nikon's first such camera since the days when you could charge the best part of a thousand dollars for a well-specified compact - is a considerably less ambitious product than the G7; it reminded me of a Coolpix 7900 with added bells and whistles, and it's not as big a leap forward from the P3/P4 as it first appears, physical design aside. So is this a bad thing? Not at all; the P5000 offers pretty much everything the Canon G7 does - with SLR-like levels of control - in a package that is truly pocketable. This puts it, essentially, in a class of its own, and this is why the promise of Nikon quality and full photographic control in such a small package caused such excitement when the P5000 was announced earlier this year. I remember thinking myself that this looked like exactly what I'd been looking for as a 'carry anywhere' compact that gave me back the controls I missed with most pocket cameras. As to whether it delivers on that promise depends on how - and what - you take pictures of. This is because the P5000, in common with most recent Coolpix models, has a serious issue with focus speed that makes it totally unsuitable for use in situations where quick reactions are essential. If you're taking landscapes you can live with waiting a second (or two if you're unlucky) for the camera to focus and take the picture, but snapping restless children (or in fact anything moving) is frustrating and ultimately a hit 'n' miss affair. This is all the more infuriating because the P5000 is otherwise such an impressive little camera; it's got an extensive and useful range of features and an easily mastered control system that doesn't have you scrolling through menus to change the aperture, is expandable via add-on lenses and flashguns and is, if you know what you're doing, capable of superb results. And it does all this in a compact lightweight body that makes the Canon G7 look like a house brick - and at a price that means you can still feed the kids at the end of the month. And so, in conclusion, the P5000 is a product that - like so many we look at - has an achilles heel that we feel is important enough to reduce its rating, because it has a serious effect on the overall usability of an otherwise excellent camera. Put simply it feels sluggish in use and has focus speeds that would have been considered 'average' 5 years ago. For many users it won't be a serious issue, but if you've got used to the focus speeds of the best cameras in this class (some of which focus 2 or even 3 times faster) it's irritating, to say the least, to miss shots because the focus takes too long. I found myself pre-focusing for virtually every shot to avoid the delay. Weighed up against the many positives the sluggish focus has to be put into context; only you will know if the kind of pictures you take are going to be affected by an extra half second or so delay, and I can't stress enough that there is an awful lot to like about the P5000. For this reason it just about earns our recommendation, even if it's a recommendation that comes with an important qualification: 'if you don't need fast focus'.
Want to make
sure you don't miss out on any future reviews? |
| Share: | ||||
| Actions: | < Previous | Next > | Print page |
Please wait, fetching latest prices.
