PIX 2015
Previous page Next page

Body & Design

The D5200 is very similar in design to its predecessor, the D5100, with few obvious changes. Indeed, place both cameras side-by-side and you'd be hard pressed to tell them apart. The D5200's lines are slightly sleeker and more streamlined - for example it does away with the little finger 'hook' on the left side of the body. More notable changes are on the top plate, where the D5200 gains a stereo microphone in front of the hot shoe, and a new drive mode button beside the mode dial.

With the D5200 you get a small, lightweight DSLR that, despite its plastic body feels pretty solid, with no flexing or creaking. The D5200 has a reasonable set of external controls, and of course a fully-articulated LCD screen that offers benefits for live view and movie shooting. The 4-way controller on the back of the camera is used to move the active focus point among the 39 total options in the viewfinder. As you'd expect in a camera of this class, many functions have to be accessed via the rear LCD. Yet, the D5200 lacks the touchscreen capability that we saw Canon introduce to the DSLR market with the EOS 650D.

The D5200 also offers an ample array of connectors - along with the usual HDMI and USB/AV out, there's a stereo microphone input for movie recording, and a multi-function port that accepts both Nikon's optional GP-1 GPS unit, and the MC-DC2 electronic cable release. Microphone levels can be displayed onscreen in movie mode but videographers needing a headphone jack will have to move up to the larger and more costly D7100. The D5200 also has front and rear receivers for the ML-L3 wireless remote. Overall the D5200 is, by any measure, a well-featured camera for its class.

In your hand

The D5200 is a lightweight yet sturdy-feeling camera that's sensibly designed so most of the the key controls fall readily to hand. Like all compact SLRs the grip is a little on the small side, so photographers with large hands should try before they buy. Both the grip and the rear 'thumbpad' below the control dial are rubberized, which helps give a secure hold.

Articulating LCD screen

Like the D5100, the D5200 has a side-hinged swivel-and-tilt screen, which offers a wide range of movement and (unlike tilt-only screens) can still be used in portrait format either at waist level or overhead. This is great for live view shooting and working off a tripod.

Video shooters, who often must remain in one position for long stretches while filming, can particularly appreciate the benefits of an articulated screen. Indeed, for many videographers, this feature alone is likely to make the D5200 a more attractive option than the D7100.

The D5200's side-hinged screen offers a wide range of movement - when folded out it can be rotated downwards for overhead shooting, upwards for waist-level shots, or forwards for self-portraits. It can also be folded flat against the camera's back pointing inwards when not in use, to protect the screen against scratches or merely getting covered in nose grease.

The rear LCD is where you'll spend the bulk of your time adjusting camera and shooting settings. As such we'd love to see Nikon adopt a touchscreen interface, as we saw (with great effect) on the Canon EOS 650D. This would make operating the camera more efficient, and dare we say, for its intended audience, more fun as well.


The D5200 uses a similar viewfinder to the D5100, which means its of the pentamirror type with 95% coverage of the image area, and a relatively small 0.78x magnification. For stills-only shooters, this may rank among the least-impressive specs of the camera.

One figure hidden away in every SLR's spec is the size of the viewfinder (often in a format that makes comparison between competing models impossible). The size of the viewfinder is a key factor in the usability of an SLR - the bigger it is, the easier it is to frame and focus your shots, and the more enjoyable and involving process it is.

Because of the way viewfinders are measured (using a fixed lens, rather than a lens of equivalent magnification), you also need to take the sensor size into account, so the numbers in the diagram below are the manufacturer's specified magnifications divided by the respective 'crop factors'.

The D5200 has a viewfinder magnification of .49x, which is significantly smaller than that of the higher-end D7100 not to mention the impressively high magnification EVF on the Sony SLT-A57.

The viewfinder offers 95% coverage of the actual scene capture (shown below), which of course raises the possibility of some unseen elements in advertently ending up in the corners of your final image. In real-world use a discrepancy of this size will seldom be a significant issue. And for instances where precise framing is absolutely critical, you can shoot in live view mode to preview full scene coverage.

This simulated view demonstrates how much of the scene is visible with 95% viewfinder coverage. The area shaded in white appears in the final image but not in the viewfinder.

Information display

The D5200 uses the same Type B BriteView Clear Matte Mark VII screen found on the D5100. The viewfinder displays basic shooting information such as shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation and ISO, alongside AE lock status and flash information. You have the option of displaying the current ISO setting in place of the default 'frames remaining', which is of questionable use with today's large-capacity SD cards; an option not available on the cheaper D3200.

Shooting information is displayed along a black border below the image area. The screen itself features the camera's 39 AF points. An optional grid overlay (shown here) can aid in composition though the camera lacks the level indicators found on the more expensive D7100.

Disappointingly, the D5200 lacks an eye sensor to turn off the rear screen when you're using the viewfinder, so it can flicker away distractingly at you, turning off as you half-press the shutter then lighting up again when you take your finger away. You can at least use the 'info' button behind the shutter release to manually turn the screen off.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 21
Michael Stewart

I have owned my 5200 since early 2013. I am not at all disappointed. Images are bright and sharp with good shadow detail, although I do find that in summer shots it tends to over expose slightly which of course is easily cured by adjusting the +/- adjustment one stop. I particularly like the ability to adjust colour balance on screen, immediately after taking a shot. V useful under artificial light. Daylight 'A' white balance setting is more than adequate outdoors. Shots taken with high ISO 2 or 3000 seem indistinguishable from those at 200 ISO This is a great advance over my earlier D70s.

1 upvote

I currently have a Panasonic point and shoot camera and find that the kids are often blurry especially in low light, and also find that my outside shots are often either to bright or to dark. I've been thinking of getting a SLR for a few years now but want one that's automatic as Im usually taking pics of the kids and they generally move pretty quick, what would your recommendation be? D5200??

1 upvote
Michael 59

I love my 5200 and recommend it. The 3200 and 5100 are also very good cameras. Any one of the three would be a good one to get.


The 3xxx series cameras have fixed displays, the 5xxx cameras have pivoting displays, and more toys, bells and whistles. 3/51xx are 16MP, while the 3/52xx are 24MP. I have a 5200, and I love it...

1 upvote
Michael 59

I recently upgraded from a D5100 to the D5200. Even though I've only taken snapshots here and there, I think the cameras image quality is great. I also have a D3200 which I bought for the higher MP. The 3200 takes beautiful pictures in my opinion, but lacks the bells & whistles I've got used to with the 5100. Even though the image quality in the 5100 was great, I liked the higher MP's, better auto-focus system, faster processor, and misc. other tweaks in the 5200. I still have the 3200 as a backup. The way I see it, The D5200 is like having all the great features "plus some others" of the 3200 and 5100 rolled into one camera. If you can afford the D5200, I recommend you purchase one. Something worth checking into is refurbs. Nikon as well as others sell those at a nice discount and they are inspected and practically like a new one. That how I got the one I have.


This is one of the best cameras in the world!

1 upvote
mumbai architect

Hi I am an architect and need to shoot interiors and buildings. I have been seeing D800E as a choice for the camera on the net. I don't have the budget to buy D800...Will D5200 suffice if I go for additional wide angle.? Please advise.


it will be suffice. just buy a wide-lens and there you go


One question on wide angle lens. The Tokina DX 11-16 is a DX lens. Reading about its specs on DPR the same say 17-24 equivalent. Why ? I though this "factor" of 1.5 applied when you mounted a FX a lens on DX ?


Is this better than D5100? I have D3100 and am planning to upgrade... but I am confused between D5100, D3200 and D5200...

sophi loren

I was confused in between nikon D5200 and Nikon D3200 and at last I go with Nikon D5200 for its ultimate power and obviously the ability of great videoing. DPreview really helps me a lot in this case. Recently I read a review aabout Nikon D5200 best buy and the writer really explain lots of intersting facts about D5200 ad alos offer a great price deal there. I think that will help you guys.

Review Link:


Enjoy with your Nikon and I really proud for my D5200

Comment edited 22 seconds after posting
sophi loren

I hope you will get help from that review :)

Comment edited 36 seconds after posting
1 upvote
Zac boy

Sophi loren How are you....?? I wanna ask you something...?


I don't get it, what is the actual dynamic range of this camera? Without the ADL it seems to be a pretty mediocre 10EV, with ADL extra high it's 13 EV. Is ADL actually extending the dynamic range of the captured information, or is it just some "clever" post-processing?

1 upvote

I have the same question!


Was torn between the extra physical controls of the D7100 and the tilting screen of the D5200 along with its lighter more ergonomic feel in hand. Image quality between the two seems similar. I opted for the D5200 and so far happy I went for it rather than the slighlty larger D7100. Thought I'd spend the cost difference in better lens quality. The D7100 screw drive would have focused by old film Nikkor lenses, but I thought it better to move to newer DX lenses with the amazing VR which didn't exist when I used film.

Only grip is I would prefer a second dial, but the tilt screen was worth the compromise. I don't bother using the ridiculously high 24mp image size, instead opting for 'medium' which is about 16mp which is more than enough. A very happy camper so far. After defecting from Nikon film SLRs to Fuji compact bridges a decade ago, now very pleased with the compact feel of the D5200 and the images it produces with ergonomic ease.


I am trying to decide between the Nikon D5200 and the Canon T5i (700D).
I am *totally* confused by the JPG/Noise/ISO data on this page.

DPReview gives higher ratings to the Nikon, both for image quality and for noise. But, when I see the data above, I see the exact opposite. I must be mis-reading the data. I am only interested in the JPEG data. I don't like to use RAW - just takes up way too much space on my harddisk....

From what I see above, the Canon image seems much crisper - much much less noise. Can someone explain why DPReview gives the nod to the Nikon??

When I downloaded the sample image for both cameras, I also think the Canon seems so much crisper and sharper. Why would someone think the Nikon picture is better? They must be seeing something I am missing.

Any insight would be appreciated....

1 upvote
Duncan Dimanche

big cloister of dead pixels visible in that last visible video sample…. in the center…argh


"particularly if you're prepared to move beyond either of the kit lenses to higher quality optics"

Which lens would provide better image quality providing a similar range like the 18-105?

Recommendations are welcome.


considering that You have plenty of pixels to crop from 24M, and pretty average performance of mentioned lenses on long end, I would rather use tamron's or sigma's 17-50s with 2.8 light. Both in proce range of about $300-$400. They will actually allow You to take benefit of such big number of pixels.



why is the D5200 better for sports than the D5300?

Total comments: 21