Previous page Next page

Conclusion - Pros

  • Excellent low ISO performance in both JPEG and Raw files
  • Class-leading noise performance at high ISO sensitivities
  • Very good default JPEG settings
  • Articulated rear screen
  • Effective auto white balance in a variety of lighting conditions
  • Auto ISO selection can be linked to lens focal length
  • Generous frame coverage of 39-point AF array
  • Customizeable Fn button
  • In-camera Raw processing
  • Ability to output uncompressed HD video to an external recorder
  • Manual audio recording levels
  • 3.5mm Stereo mic input

Conclusion - Cons

  • Slow AF in live view and video modes (compared to mirrorless APS-C cameras)
  • No real-time aperture adjustment in live view
  • Relatively small image buffer limits burst capacity in Raw-enabled modes
  • Soft video output at default settings
  • No aperture control in video mode
  • Upsampled video at default 60i output
  • When shooting in live view, rear screen is blacked out until data is written to the card
  • File numbering default that resets after every card format

Overall conclusion

The Nikon D5200 is a solid performer that offers an impressive array of specifications for a camera of its class. Indeed, the number of features it shares with its higher-end Nikon stablemates is to be applauded. In addition to an excellent 24MP sensor that gives up precious little to that of the (non-AA filtered) D7100, the D5200 boasts a 39 point AF system, lens-dependent Auto ISO implementation and class-leading high ISO noise performance.

The D5200 stands out as the only recent-model Nikon DSLR to sport an articulated screen which comes in handy for both stills and video shooters, though we can't help but wish it was touch enabled as is the one on the Canon EOS T5i/700D. The D5200 offers a reasonable number of external controls, but as you'd expect on a camera of this class, more advanced users will have to satisfy their needs with visits to the main menu. You do have a customizeable Fn button though, and the camera's '[i]' button allows more direct access to 14 separate camera and shooting settings. If we nitpick, we'd like to see even faster access that omits a second confirmation click before you can actually change a setting in this manner. Overall though, we find that the D5200 strikes a nice balance between providing essential shooting controls without overwhelming novice DSLR users.

The plastic build of the D5200 feels reasonably solid in hand, certainly in line with its peers from Canon and Sony. And while those with larger hands may find the grip a bit on the shallow side, the camera balances well with the consumer-grade zoom lenses many will be likely to put in front of it.

Image Quality

Image quality is certainly one of the D5200's greatest strengths. And this goes beyond the fact that it delivers 24MP output, which is impressive in its own right. At base ISO, the camera's Raw files show impressive levels of detail, particularly if you're prepared to move beyond either of the kit lenses to higher quality optics. At high ISO sensitivities, the noise performance of the D5200 is the best that we've seen from a DSLR at this price point. Noise reduction is very effective - concentrating on chroma noise to avoid unnecessarily blurring image details.

The camera's auto white balance does a fine job of rendering accurate colors in all but the more extreme lighting conditions. We also find that the camera's default JPEG settings produce pleasing files that don't display prominent sharpening artifacts. As always, you have the option of tweaking these settings to taste, but we haven't found much to complain about in the D5200's out-of-the-box JPEG output. Users who demand the utmost in detail and dynamic range will of course be shooting in Raw mode and we've found the D5200's files offer plenty of latitude for sharpening adjustments, retention of highlight detail and - at low ISOs - the opening up of shadow areas with minimal noise penalty.

While the camera's video specs are impressive, there are a couple of disappointments. If you want to record at 1080 50i or 60i, you should know that this involves a crop of the sensor area which is then upsampled to 1920 x 1080, resulting in noticeably soft results with tell-tale upsampling artifacts. On a pixel level we found the default out-of-camera video files to be a bit soft but, to be fair, the D5200 delivers files that can withstand relatively aggressive sharpening in post-production, resulting in crisp-looking video.


The D5200 handles in a very similar fashion as its predecessor, the D5100. And this is a good thing, as we were quite pleased with the earlier model. The most essential shooting controls have direct access control points. And a dedicated '[i]' button allows access to a greater selection of options without entering the main menu.

The camera's main feature from an ergonomics/handling feature may well be its articulated screen. Whether shooting with the camera mounted on a tripod, grabbing a shot above your head or below waist level, or simply angling the screen away from glare in bright daylight, there are many instances in which an articulated screen can come in handy.

A respectable 5 fps maximum frame rate makes the D5200 suitable for casual action shots like recreational sports. And if you shoot in JPEG mode, you aren't likely to have to wait on the camera as it writes to the SD card. In our time spent shooting real world images, the D5200 proved itself a good, brisk performer overall and was generally ready to shoot when we needed it to be.

The Final Word

The D5200 is a solid performer that, while geared towards beginning DSLR users from an operational standpoint, shares many specifications with more expensive enthusiast offerings. It combines excellent image quality and impressive high ISO performance with an articulated screen and video capabilities that hold appeal for video shooters with a post-production workflow.

The D5200 doen't have the touchscreen capability of the Canon EOS T5i / 700D and is not as feature-laden as Sony's SLT-series cameras with sweep panorama and built-in GPS. But, if the D5200 is a bit conservative by comparison, for those looking for traditional photographic basics done well, Nikon has provided an option worthy of consideration.

We do find fault with limitations such as lack of aperture control with live view engaged and the combined stills/video live view implementation makes accurate framing for video output difficult in many situations. Users wanting to shoot in live view mode will have to settle for slower autofocus performance than they'd get from nearly any mirrorless camera. And we're also disappointed in the camera's 60i video output, which contains upsampling artifacts.

On the whole, however, Nikon has gotten a lot more right than wrong, with the D5200 offering significant upgrades over its predecessor, the D5100. It inherits genuinely useful features from higher-end models, including focal length-dependent Auto ISO behavior and a 39 point AF system. That this all comes in a package with a very reasonable body-only list price of $800, speaks to the impressive value available to DSLR shooters on a budget. As such, the Nikon D5200 easily earns our Silver award.

Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category.
Click here to learn about the changes to our scoring system and what these numbers mean.

Nikon D5200
Category: Mid Range Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR
Build quality
Ergonomics & handling
Metering & focus accuracy
Image quality (raw)
Image quality (jpeg)
Low light / high ISO performance
Viewfinder / screen rating
Movie / video mode
Good for
Users who demand the utmost in image detail at low ISO values and videographers who can make use of uncompressed video footage.
Not so good for
Photographers who work primarily in live view and videographers who want high quality 60i output.
Overall score
The Nikon D5200 is a solid performer that delivers excellent image quality and impressive high-ISO performance, along with an articulated screen and a control interface that's appropriate for users stepping up to a DSLR.

Recommended links

Want to make sure you don't miss out on any future articles?
Sign up for our free weekly newsletter!

Enter the 'Nikon DX SLR' Discussion Forum

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 22
Michael Stewart

I have owned my 5200 since early 2013. I am not at all disappointed. Images are bright and sharp with good shadow detail, although I do find that in summer shots it tends to over expose slightly which of course is easily cured by adjusting the +/- adjustment one stop. I particularly like the ability to adjust colour balance on screen, immediately after taking a shot. V useful under artificial light. Daylight 'A' white balance setting is more than adequate outdoors. Shots taken with high ISO 2 or 3000 seem indistinguishable from those at 200 ISO This is a great advance over my earlier D70s.

1 upvote

I currently have a Panasonic point and shoot camera and find that the kids are often blurry especially in low light, and also find that my outside shots are often either to bright or to dark. I've been thinking of getting a SLR for a few years now but want one that's automatic as Im usually taking pics of the kids and they generally move pretty quick, what would your recommendation be? D5200??

1 upvote
Michael 59

I love my 5200 and recommend it. The 3200 and 5100 are also very good cameras. Any one of the three would be a good one to get.


The 3xxx series cameras have fixed displays, the 5xxx cameras have pivoting displays, and more toys, bells and whistles. 3/51xx are 16MP, while the 3/52xx are 24MP. I have a 5200, and I love it...

Michael 59

I recently upgraded from a D5100 to the D5200. Even though I've only taken snapshots here and there, I think the cameras image quality is great. I also have a D3200 which I bought for the higher MP. The 3200 takes beautiful pictures in my opinion, but lacks the bells & whistles I've got used to with the 5100. Even though the image quality in the 5100 was great, I liked the higher MP's, better auto-focus system, faster processor, and misc. other tweaks in the 5200. I still have the 3200 as a backup. The way I see it, The D5200 is like having all the great features "plus some others" of the 3200 and 5100 rolled into one camera. If you can afford the D5200, I recommend you purchase one. Something worth checking into is refurbs. Nikon as well as others sell those at a nice discount and they are inspected and practically like a new one. That how I got the one I have.


This is one of the best cameras in the world!

mumbai architect

Hi I am an architect and need to shoot interiors and buildings. I have been seeing D800E as a choice for the camera on the net. I don't have the budget to buy D800...Will D5200 suffice if I go for additional wide angle.? Please advise.


it will be suffice. just buy a wide-lens and there you go


One question on wide angle lens. The Tokina DX 11-16 is a DX lens. Reading about its specs on DPR the same say 17-24 equivalent. Why ? I though this "factor" of 1.5 applied when you mounted a FX a lens on DX ?


Is this better than D5100? I have D3100 and am planning to upgrade... but I am confused between D5100, D3200 and D5200...


D5200 has 39 focusing points, that made me a decision
D3200 & D5100 only offer 11
D5200 and D5100 offer an articulated screen display

sophi loren

I was confused in between nikon D5200 and Nikon D3200 and at last I go with Nikon D5200 for its ultimate power and obviously the ability of great videoing. DPreview really helps me a lot in this case. Recently I read a review aabout Nikon D5200 best buy and the writer really explain lots of intersting facts about D5200 ad alos offer a great price deal there. I think that will help you guys.

Review Link:

Enjoy with your Nikon and I really proud for my D5200

Comment edited 22 seconds after posting
sophi loren

I hope you will get help from that review :)

Comment edited 36 seconds after posting
1 upvote
Zac boy

Sophi loren How are you....?? I wanna ask you something...?


I don't get it, what is the actual dynamic range of this camera? Without the ADL it seems to be a pretty mediocre 10EV, with ADL extra high it's 13 EV. Is ADL actually extending the dynamic range of the captured information, or is it just some "clever" post-processing?

1 upvote

I have the same question!


Was torn between the extra physical controls of the D7100 and the tilting screen of the D5200 along with its lighter more ergonomic feel in hand. Image quality between the two seems similar. I opted for the D5200 and so far happy I went for it rather than the slighlty larger D7100. Thought I'd spend the cost difference in better lens quality. The D7100 screw drive would have focused by old film Nikkor lenses, but I thought it better to move to newer DX lenses with the amazing VR which didn't exist when I used film.

Only grip is I would prefer a second dial, but the tilt screen was worth the compromise. I don't bother using the ridiculously high 24mp image size, instead opting for 'medium' which is about 16mp which is more than enough. A very happy camper so far. After defecting from Nikon film SLRs to Fuji compact bridges a decade ago, now very pleased with the compact feel of the D5200 and the images it produces with ergonomic ease.


I am trying to decide between the Nikon D5200 and the Canon T5i (700D).
I am *totally* confused by the JPG/Noise/ISO data on this page.

DPReview gives higher ratings to the Nikon, both for image quality and for noise. But, when I see the data above, I see the exact opposite. I must be mis-reading the data. I am only interested in the JPEG data. I don't like to use RAW - just takes up way too much space on my harddisk....

From what I see above, the Canon image seems much crisper - much much less noise. Can someone explain why DPReview gives the nod to the Nikon??

When I downloaded the sample image for both cameras, I also think the Canon seems so much crisper and sharper. Why would someone think the Nikon picture is better? They must be seeing something I am missing.

Any insight would be appreciated....

1 upvote
Duncan Dimanche

big cloister of dead pixels visible in that last visible video sample…. in the center…argh


"particularly if you're prepared to move beyond either of the kit lenses to higher quality optics"

Which lens would provide better image quality providing a similar range like the 18-105?

Recommendations are welcome.


considering that You have plenty of pixels to crop from 24M, and pretty average performance of mentioned lenses on long end, I would rather use tamron's or sigma's 17-50s with 2.8 light. Both in proce range of about $300-$400. They will actually allow You to take benefit of such big number of pixels.



why is the D5200 better for sports than the D5300?

Total comments: 22