Previous page Next page

Conclusion - Pros

  • Excellent image quality in both Raw and JPEG
  • Sharp lens with good consistency up to fairly wide apertures
  • Large sensor in genuinely small body
  • Simple and responsive user interface
  • Good build quality
  • Good live view magnification allows precise manual focus
  • Compatible with Nikon Speedlights

Conclusion - Cons

  • Significant vignetting in both JPEG and Raw files
  • Pedestrian focusing limits 'decisive moment' abilities
  • No ND filter and 1/2000th sec shutter speed limit bright-light flexibility
  • Extremely limited movie capabilities
  • No Commander mode for use with remote flashguns

Overall conclusion

The Coolpix A represents a welcome expansion by Nikon into photographer-targeted niches that had previously been rather under-served. With it the company has brought its mass-market expertise to make a camera that offers the same simplified interface and pleasant JPEGs that underpin its popular entry-level DSLRs. Both these things help make it an attractive second camera for DSLR users, especially those who shoot Nikon.

The Coolpix A avoids the odd quirks and foibles that have become something of a Coolpix signature, with the 'A' instead offering the logic and dependability of the company's self-developed DSLRs. However, the Coolpix A does not exist in the market on its own. Just weeks after its announcement, Pentax Ricoh announced a model that fulfills a very similar role and represents extremely fierce competition to the Nikon.

Image Quality

The Coolpix A presents few surprises when it comes to image quality - the JPEGs have the pleasant color response of the company's DSLRs, as well as offering the clever Active D-Lighting processing option for getting well-balance images straight out of the camera. Low light performance is also good, with Nikon's image processing again speaking in the camera's favor.

In Raw, Nikon's decision to offer 14-bit Raw offers a theoretical advantage over the Ricoh when it comes to dynamic range but for the majority of images that don't need extreme processing, the difference is moot.

The lack of anti-aliasing filter, combined with a very sharp lens means the Coolpix A is capable of some highly detailed images. And, as with the recent filter-less Nikon D7100, moire is rarely a problem in real-world shooting. Both Raw and JPEG output exhibit distinctly shaded corners at most apertures but the fall-off is very progressive, so it's rarely noticeable.

Handling and Operation

The Coolpix A is a well built, solid-feeling little camera - it fits well in the hand and, significantly, will slip into a moderately-sized pocket. And, if you like shooting the moderately wide angle of view that 28mm equivalent gives you, this makes the Coolpix a promising prospect.

It mimics the behavior of Nikon's entry-level, single dial DSLRs to a great extent - putting the primary shooting settings at the user's fingertips. Two customizable Fn buttons do a good job of reducing the need to use the camera's slightly fiddly [i] menu, but it never offers quite the same sense of being a moment away from the setting you want to change that the Ricoh can.

Mercifully, the Coolpix A avoids the recent Coolpix tradition of poor data transfer and firmware quirks - it works just as responsively and dependably as the company's DSLRs.

The final word

The Coolpix A is a very good camera that, if it stood in isolation, would represent an interesting addition to the camera market. Of course the reality is that it doesn't exist in a vacuum and, while many photographers will be very happy with it, a considerable portion of its thunder is stolen by the Ricoh GR - a camera that achieves the unusual trick of being a touch better in almost every respect while also being significantly cheaper.

We're also not totally convinced about the price/size/performance balance that either of these cameras strikes, given their only moderately-bright F2.8 lenses. In the course of the review process we have increasingly appreciated their pocketability, though.

There are a few things that recommend the Coolpix A over the Ricoh - its JPEGs are arguably nicer than the GR's and both its flash hot shoe and user-interface will be immediately compatible for Nikon DSLR users. Whether this is enough to justify the price premium over a slightly faster, slightly smaller and (to our minds) slightly more capable camera, is another matter.

Click here to learn about the changes to our scoring system and what these numbers mean

Nikon Coolpix A
Category: Enthusiast Large Sensor Compact Camera
Build quality
Ergonomics & handling
Metering & focus accuracy
Image quality (raw)
Image quality (jpeg)
Low light / high ISO performance
Viewfinder / screen rating
Movie / video mode
Good for
Nikon users looking for a pocketable alternative to their DSLR (particularly those who own Nikon Speedlights).
Not so good for
Photographers shooting fast-moving subjects.
Overall score
The Coolpix A offers DSLR-standard image quality and an excellent 28mm-equivalent lens in a well-polished, pocketable camera. Compared to the competition, the Coolpix A is solid, if not class leading in any particular respect, but its user interface will be immediately familiar to Nikon shooters and the results it produces are dependably good.

Recommended Links

Want to make sure you don't miss out on any future articles?
Sign up for our free weekly newsletter!

Enter the 'Nikon Coolpix talk' Discussion Forum

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 13

Yes the firmware version 1.2 did improve the autofocus, I purchased a Coolpix A 3 days a go, and upgraded to the new firmware last night, it does make a improvement.


Some reviews say the corners are bit soft, true?

Also has the autofocus improved with firmware upgrades?


At the current $399 price new, I can't see how anyone could call it a bad deal. I love mine.


$399 ? Where ? Thanks


This appears to be gray market, but is new with a 3 yr. extended warranty included. The link has more at the bottom of the page. My previous post was during the summer, when more were available.

1 upvote
SW Anderson

In the spirit of constructive criticism, I sought in vain some mention about the LCD's usability outdoors in sunlight. (If I missed this, please tell me where in the review it's located.) I think LCD performance is especially important in a pocketable, take-wherever camera -- whose manufacturer charges a whopping $450 for a shoe-mount optical viewfinder. (For that kind of money, Nikon should build a top-plate replacement with built-in rangefinder, IMO.)


See it for $400 on amazon now in silver. Looks good for aerial photography but it lacks HDR, time-lapse and video is "basic". Only missing feature for time-lapse is that 4FPS is too fast, would be nice to slow it down (likely via time-lapse feature) to 1 FPS. I simply use rubber bands to hold my current camera's shutter button down and shoot continuously. Simple and adds no weight (rubber bands are also holding the camera down, so they are needed regardless).


Just bought one from BH Photo including the electronic viewfinder for $490.00. Quite a camera for that price.


Frankly, how you can let yourself be disappointed by autofocus when the camera has manual focus is beyond me. Pre-focus and snap away!


I see what looks like the same Coolpix A offered on for about 1000 dollars and for about 650 dollars. The latter is marked "import". Anybody able to explain the difference?


Any deeply discounted price indicates that it is likely an import. Nikon will not service it if you have a problem. You can take the risk, but if you experience a problem do not give Nikon a bad review. Don't say I knew but...

Also note that you will not be able to download firmware updates for the camera. I would not touch an imported camera. If you want to save money, then wait about a year and hope they are coming out with a newer version - and that is when they offer great discounts. For example, Nikon just dropped the price on the camera for only $699.


That price!

Comment edited 20 seconds after posting
unknown member
By (unknown member) (Nov 16, 2013)

Over $1,000 for a DX sensor with a fixed 28mm lens? I get that it is for "enthusiasts", but that seems like quite a bit of enthusiasm to me.

Total comments: 13