Software - RAW conversion
Supplied software
Kodak has put a lot more effort into providing a usable RAW converter than many of its competitors, and although it doesn't offer anything like the fine control of something like Adobe Camera Raw, it does at least allow you to tweak exposure, contrast, sharpness, noise reduction and white balance. One neat touch is that once you've made the changes you can save the result as a new RAW file (.kdc format), and go back and tweak the settings in the future as all the original RAW information is still contained in the file. Interestingly, the copy of EasyShare supplied with our review camera wasn't actually able to open the RAW files - we had to download an update from the Kodak.com website.
So then, a far better effort than the likes of Panasonic and Samsung provide with their RAW -capable cameras - in functionality terms at least.
JPEG & RAW Resolution compared
As the crops below show, the P850 is capturing a little more resolution than the out-of-camera JPEGs would suggest, and that both the in-camera processing and the EasyShare raw converter use a lot of heavy-handed sharpening. The Adobe Camera RAW result shows just how soft the images from the P850 are, when viewed without all that sharpening (though, as is often the case, ACR has managed to eke a little more resolution out of the files too).
![]() |
||
Adobe Camera Raw |
JPEG from camera | EasyShare Raw -> TIFF (Default) |
Studio shot comparison
Looking at our studio shots it's obvious that you can get a little more detail out of raw files than JPEGs, but not using the supplied software (you need Adobe Camera Raw). The reason is simple - the files produced in-camera have fairly heavy noise reduction and sharpening applied. Looking at these shots you can see just how noisy the ISO 400 images are, and just how much detail has been sacrificed to noise reduction. What you don't get with ACR are those lovely 'Kodak' colors, though by playing with the controls you can at least get a cleaner, more natural file - and one that responds well to post-processing.
So, not a lot in it when it comes to detail, but in truth, the real appeal of raw capture for P850 users is that you can alter white balance, exposure and sharpening / noise reduction after the shot has been taken, and that you aren't stuck with the rather 'over the top' image processing.
| Adobe Camera Raw,
RAW -> TIFF (manual white balance, all other settings default) ACR 3.3 Beta ISO 50 studio scene 100% crops |
|
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
| EasyShare software , RAW -> TIFF (manual white balance, all other settings default) ISO 50 studio scene 100% crops |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| JPEG out of camera, Fine quality setting ISO 50 studio scene 100% crops |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| Adobe Camera Raw, RAW -> TIFF (manual white balance, all other settings default) ACR 3.3 Beta ISO 400 studio scene 100% crops |
|
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
| EasyShare software , RAW -> TIFF (manual white balance, all other settings default) ISO 50 studio scene 100% crops |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| JPEG out of camera, Fine quality setting ISO 400 studio scene 100% crops |
|
![]() |
![]() |

























