Previous page Next page


The X-system is still relatively small, but it's growing pretty quickly. There are currently five lenses for the X-E1 and X-Pro 1, and we'll be taking a look at them in the next two pages.

XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R OIS LM

Most of our shooting with the X-E1 was done with the 18-55mm 'kit' lens (27-80mm equivalent), which adds a considerable heft to the camera, weighing 310 grams - only 40 grams less than the camera body with a battery and card installed. The 18-55mm is no typical bundled zoom - at around $700 when purchased separately it's not a cheap lens, and with a maximum aperture of F2.8-4 it's at least a stop faster than normal kit zooms, too - which partly explains its relatively heavyweight build. Despite the relatively wide maximum aperture though, the lens isn't much larger than either Fujifilm's 60mm F2.4 R Macro, or Sony's E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS for NEX.

Fortunately, the cost and weight are justified by excellent optical quality, attractive bokeh and smooth operation. Zooming in particular is very smooth, but the 'fly-by-wire', unmarked aperture ring turns a little too easily. We'd prefer firmer detents to avoid accidental operation.

18-55mm @18mm (27mm equivalent) 18-55mm @55mm (80mm equivalent)

The 'LM' designation indicates that the 18-55mm uses a Linear Motor focusing system, with two motors driving the larger-than-usual focus group; this, and the internal focus system, is designed to give fast autofocus that's also near-silent during movie shooting. Fujifilm claims that the optical image stabilization allows hand-holding at shutter speeds four stops slower than would otherwise be possible without blur from camera shake.

In general, this held true during our use, and assuming a static subject, we've been able to get reliably sharp images at shutter speeds between 1/15 - 1/10sec at the long end of the 18-55mm zoom, and acceptable sharpness down to 1/8 - 1/5sec, although not, at this point, with 100% reliability.

For comparison (left to right): XR 18-55mm F2.8-4 R OIS LM alongside the XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro, and the XF 35mm F1.4 R.
Because the 18-55mm F2.8-4 has a variable maximum aperture, its aperture ring is no longer marked - instead it rotates continuously, with click-stops for every third-stop change.

A separate switch on the side selects between aperture control on the lens, or automatic control by the camera when set to the A position.
The zoom and focus rings of the 18-55mm zoom are separated by a slim silver ring, which adds a nice visual touch to the design. Both operate very smoothly.

The 18-55mm can of course also be used on the X-Pro1 as well, and when shooting with the optical viewfinder, the frameline will zoom to match the current focal length.


Kitting the X-E1 with a variable-aperture zoom lens limits your ability to control background blur at certain focal lengths compared to faster aperture primes, but the XF18-55mm F2.8-4 lens still shows good out-of-focus characteristics, and pleasant bokeh.

The table below shows the 18-55mm compared to the excellent 35mm prime, at the same focal length. Naturally, zooming the kit lens to 35mm, as shown below limits its maximum available aperture - F3.6 compared to F1.4 from the prime. But the quality of the out of focus backgrounds from both lenses at the same aperture is very high - the 18-55mm gives slightly harsher bokeh than the prime at the same aperture settings, but only very slightly.

We've also included a shot showing the 35mm prime 'wide open' at F1.4, to demonstrate the shallower depth of field which is possible from the faster lens.

18-55mm kit @ 35mm, F3.6
35mm F1.4 @ F3.6
35mm F1.4 @ F1.4

Use of third party lenses with adapters

One of the great advantages of mirrorless cameras is their ability to use a vast range of lenses via mount adapters, including top-quality Leica M-mount primes and the huge number of 'orphaned' manual focus lenses from obsolete film camera systems. Fujifilm makes a very clever adapter for Leica M-mount lenses, and third-party adapters are available in a plethora of mounts for both current (Leica M, Nikon F, Pentax K) and older systems (Leica L39, Canon FD, Contax Yashica, Minolta MD, Olympus OM, etc.).

It's also possible to find adapters on eBay for electronic lens mounts such as Canon EF, but these lenses really won't work well on the X-E1 as no powered functions are available - including aperture setting and image stabilization.

The X-Pro1 (X-E1 compatibility is identical) with three Olympus OM Zuiko lenses from the 1970s that are all still easy to find today: from left to right, 50mm F1.4, 135mm F3.5 and 24mm F2.8

The use of adapters greatly expands the range of lenses that can be used with the Fujifilm X-E1 beyond the initial three native offerings, especially for photographers who already have a collection of old manual focus lenses gathering dust in the closet. To use them, you first have to enable the Mount Adapter Setting in the menu. Naturally, adapted lenses offer no automatic functions, so both focus and aperture have to be set manually. It should go without saying it's better to focus the lens wide open, then stop down to the desired aperture (although with older fast primes you may find it easier to focus with the aperture closed down a stop).

When using Fujifilm's own Leica M-mount adapter it automatically turns off the now-redundant distance scale in the viewfinder, and enables user-set optical correction profiles to be stored for to up to six lenses (covering distortion, color shading and vignetting). These functions aren't available with third-party adapters.

The X-E1 has a menu option to set the focal length of the lens you're using. This is used to fill in the EXIF data. The camera offers four presets corresponding to the most popular film wide angles - 21mm, 24mm, 28mm and 35mm - and two further lens memories which can be set freely (with 50mm and 75mm as the defaults).

Note though that the X-E1 doesn't offer any manual focus aid other than magnified view in the EVF, and most notably there's no 'Focus Peaking' display (that Sony, Pentax and Ricoh users tend to appreciate). Overall, though, we think the X-E1 will likely be the better camera for adapted lenses thanks to the slightly better implementation of the electronic viewfinder.

Fujifilm M-mount adapter

Fujifilm's own M-mount adapter is unique in having electronic contacts that tell the camera when it's attached. It has two buttons on its rim, one being the lens release while the other brings up the camera's 'Mount Adapter Settings' screen. However the contacts restrict the diameter of the opening at the rear of adapter, meaning that lenses with large rear elements won't physically fit.

This is Fujifilm's own adapter that allows use of Leica M-mount lenses on the X-E1 and X-Pro 1. Simpler 3rd-party versions don't have the electronic contacts, and therefore don't bring up the lens corrections options. Here's the X-Pro1 with an old collapsible Leica Elmar 50mm 1:2.8. Here you can also clearly see the button that brings up the adapter settings menu.

The adapter includes a dual-function plastic gauge, which you can see by clicking-through on the image above. This allows you to check not only that the lens doesn't protrude too far into the body, but also that the diameter of the rear element won't clash with the contacts (something that won't trouble simpler third-party adapters).  

Known incompatibilities include certain 21mm ultra-wide-angles and fast 35mm primes. However, the lens corrections menu is only available with the Fujifilm adapter, so it appears to be impossible to set corrections for these lenses, even if you can get them to mount.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 17
Isaac Wood

This maybe a bit random but when shooting at the maximum fps will the X-E1 work better than the Fujifilm Finepix HS20exr because some of the shots i have gotten from my HS20 exr have been all right auto focus wise at the maximum fps for the sports that i take photos for which is the field events in athletics but im wondering if the X-E1 is better.


Hello, can you help me with deciding between FujiFilm X-E1 and Canon 600D with set lenses? Size and weight is no concern. Which camera has better image quality and which one is more versatile ?

Wojciech Sawicki

Between those two? The X-E1. With the right adapters (available all over e-bay and CHEAP) you can put many, many more lenses on it (including Canon...), especially old rangefinder lenses such as those made for Leica M or LTM/M39. there are absolute gems among these. The 600D will have better AF (especially tracking moving subjects) but for everyday shooting, the Fuji will do just fine. Also, you're saying size and weight don't matter? Trust me, you they will very soon :D So yeah, Fuji.

1 upvote

These are two very different cameras, regarding size, viefinder, and other things. Depends on what you need, and it's best to try them these reviews will cover specifications but quite often what matters to you might not be mentioned in reviews.

1 upvote

I have had this camera for almost 3 weeks already and I also can’t figure out how to set the minimum shutter speed when using auto ISO, can you shed a light on that?


1 upvote

I use the quick shortcut assigned to the Q (or Fn? The one next to the shutter button) button. There, you can quickly change the minimum shutter speed while using auto ISO.


With the new update, select "ISO Auto" by pressing the right (->) button on the d-pad
There you see the settings for the minimum and maximum settings, as well as the minimum shutter speed when under auto settings

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
1 upvote

why was the X-E1 picture taken with a 35mm lens while MFT had the 50mm mounted and FF like A99 or 6D had 85mm???

1 upvote

The 35mm F1.4 and the 60mm F2.4 Macro (the only two normal / short tele primes at the time of writing) are about equally sharp at f/5.6 and f/8 (see and ). In addition, the 35mm doesn't exhibit much field curvature, unlike, say, the latter-released 27mm/f2.8 pancake (more info on this problem: )



Finally, now that the absolutely stellar (see ) Fujinon XF 56mm f/1.2 R is out, non-macro people able to shell out the double the price generally prefer it to the old 60mm F2.4. (Of course, this may not have been a point in choosing the 35mm over the 60mm back then. Nevertheless, we are pretty lucky to have a studio shot demoing the field curvature / sharpness of prolly the most popular Fuji X prime, and not that of one that has since been overshadowed by a newly released one.)


continuing my post . . .

I understand why Fujifilm designed the lens rings with those slim grooves for stylistic reasons, but I find myself frequently turning the wrong one because they all feel the same. I'll get used to it, but a rubber ring on the zoom would help. Also, the zoom ring is stiff and those little grooves are slippery. Rubber would help the grip.

I would suggest turning off the image display as the default is 1.5 seconds. The image display clogs up the EVF for 1.5 seconds making it impractical to follow action. It's in the menu under setup screen 2.

1 upvote

Had mine a short while, purchased in part due to this review.

A couple things worth mentioning in terms of this review. The exposure compensation dial on my camera has a very firm detent so there's no chance of an inadvertent movement of the dial. I've loaded body firmware 2.0 and 18-55mm lens firmware 3.0. According to Fujifilm, these updates are supposed to address a number of issues, including the slower focusing. I find the camera/lens focus speed to be quite good with this update in place.


Had my xe-1 2 weeks now and I'm blown away by the quality of the images taken with the kit zoom lens. The images could easily be printed at about 50" and are in practice comparable to my D800. AMAZING!
In use too I love it. The EVF whilst not as clear as an SLR viewfinder, tells me all I need to know and enables me to see all the menus without putting on reading specs. I use it exclusively in EVF mode. It is light and handles superbly. The image stabilisation seems incredible- so far, as good as the D800 shots from a tripod! If you're in doubt, go and buy one.


Can the back screen be turned off completely so only the electronic viewfinder is used for composing and shooting?

1 upvote

when you say ":but powering off usually cleared the error." can you expand a bit on that. Was there a different fix at another time?


What about shutter lag? Any appreciable delay from the time one pushes the button til the shutter actually releases?

Total comments: 17