Previous page Next page

Lens details

The G1 X's core capabilities are of course defined by its lens, which is an entirely-new 15.1-60.4mm F2.8-5.8 design. It offers a 28-112mm-equivalent focal length range, and in terms of depth of field and background blur, behaves much as an F5.2 - F11 optic would on a full frame camera. The lens is also fitted with a built-in 3-stop neutral density filter that can be engaged to allow the use of slower shutter speeds, for example to blur moving subjects such as flowing water.

The G1 X lens 28-112mm equivalent 4x zoom lens offers a very versatile focal length range that covers most general photography needs. However, the obvious downside of a built-in kit-lens type zoom is that it doesn't cover the extremes. There are no wide-angle or tele attachments available for the G1 X, so if your portfolio contains a large proportion of extreme wide angle and telephoto shots the Canon might not be the right tool for you.

Wide-angle (28mm equivalent) Telephoto (112mm equivalent)

The table below shows the maximum aperture reported by the camera vs focal length; the minimum aperture is an entirely sensible F16 across the range (any smaller would result in considerable diffraction blurring). We've also shown the approximate focus distance ranges promised by the camera in both normal and macro AF modes. These may come as a considerable shock to existing G-series users, but reflect the awkward reality that as actual focal lengths increase, minimum focus distances tend to follow.

Equiv FL (mm)
Maximum aperture
Minimum aperture
Focus range (Normal)
40cm - inf
50cm - inf
1.1m - inf
1.5m - inf
1.4m - inf
1.3m - inf
Focus range (Macro)
20cm - 1m
30cm - 1.5m
60cm - 1.8m
70cm - 1.8m
85cm - 1.6m

The upshot of this is that the G1 X's close-focus capabilities are distinctly limited, especially in comparison to smaller-sensor compacts such as the Olympus XZ-1. It can manage across-the-table head and shoulders portraits just fine, but nothing you'd realistically describe as 'Macro' (maximum magnification is approximately 0.08x at wideangle, and 0.07x at telephoto, giving a minimum subject area fractionally smaller than a 10"x8" print). Film compact ex-users will sigh in recognition, but photographers used solely to small-sensor digicams may be less forgiving.


The Canon G1 X offers a built-in ND-filter which can be activated in the Func-menu. This feature is very useful when you want achieve a slow shutter speed in relatively bright light conditions. The picture below of a water feature in the park was taken on an overcast day. Nevertheless, even at the lowest ISO setting (ISO 100) and using the smallest aperture (F16), 1/15 sec was the slowest shutter speed that could be achieved. The ND-filter 'swallows' three stops of light and brings the shutter speed down to 1/2 sec, achieving a more visually pleasing rendition of the flowing water.

ND filter off - 1/15 sec / F16 / ISO 100 ND filter on - 1/2 sec / F16 / ISO 100
100% crop 100% crop

Image stabilization

The G1 X comes with Canon's latest optical image stabilization, which the company claims should allow the use of hand-held shutter speeds 4 stops slower then usual before shake-induced blur becomes a problem. The system offers Canon's latest 'Intelligent IS', which automatically switches between modes dependant upon subject, choosing from Normal, Panning, Macro, Tripod, Dynamic (for movie work), Powered (for telephoto) and Dynamic + Macro modes.

Canon's image stabilization system in the GX 1 is truly impressive and in our experience comes very close to meeting these claims. In our measured studio tests at full tele (112mm equivalent) and with the 'powered IS' turned on we could still achieve a very high percentage of sharp images at a shutter speeds as slow as 1/30th sec. With IS totally turned off we needed a shutter speed of 1/250 sec to achieve the same result,and at 1/30 sec we did not get a single sharp shot.

This image was taken in very low light at an approximate equivalent focal length of 75mm. The shutter speed was 1/20th sec at ISO 6400. The G1 X's excellent image stabilization system in combination with the sensor's low-light capabilities allow for hand-held photography in very low light.

When shooting in stills mode the 'Powered IS' option does not make much difference but it is very useful when shooting videos at longer focal length where the stabilization effect is clearly visible in the resulting footage. This is especially useful in crowded spaces where there it's not possible to shoot video with a tripod. You can see a low-light video sample which was shot with the 'Powered IS' option on our video page.

Sensor size and aperture:
Relationship to low light image quality and background blur

The G1 X has a much larger sensor than other fixed-lens compacts, which implies it should offer much better high ISO image quality. But for fixed-lens cameras, that's only half of the story, and lens speed plays a crucial role when considering low light performance. Smaller-sensor cameras such as the Olympus XZ-1 and Fujifilm X10 sport lenses which are rather faster than the G1 X's, by a stop or more at wideangle and two stops at telephoto. This means that, under any given lighting, you can always use lower ISOs with these cameras if you want to, by opening the lenses up to get more light into the camera. This will go some way to offsetting the G1 X's larger-sensor advantage - especially at telephoto.

Much the same reasoning applies when considering how well each camera will be available to deliver blurred backgrounds when shooting portraits. Here the optical calculations deliver an answer that some may find surprising: when shooting portraits at the long end of the zoom with the lens wide open, the G1 X will offer little advantage over either the X10 or XZ-1 in terms of subject isolation and background blur. Of course this isn't anywhere near the whole story with regard to overall image quality, but it's worth knowing.

Overall, though, the G1 X's combination of large sensor and 4x zoom lens still provides more compositional flexibility, coupled with equal or better low-light capability, when compared to a DSLR or mirrorless interchangeable lens camera used with a typical kit zoom (14-42mm F3.5-5.6 or 18-55mm F3.5-5.6). It should also overall outperform smaller-sensor compacts like the X10 and XZ-1. However it's important to understand that the differences won't necessarily be as great as sensor size alone might suggest.

The portraits below visualize what we've been trying to explain in this section. For the first example we took images toward the long end of the zoom of the Canon G1 X and the Olympus XZ-1 respectively (approximately 112mm equiv). At this zoom position the G1 X's largest aperture is F5.8 but the XZ-1 can still open the lens up to F2.5, offsetting the smaller sensor size and generating a background blur that is close to the G1 X.

Canon G1 X, F5.8 Olympus XZ-1, F2.5

For the second example we took an image of a still life under low tungsten light. At the focal length these pictures were taken at (approximately 93mm equivalent) the Olympus XZ-1 offers a maximum aperture of F2.2 which is 2.7EV faster than the G1 X's F5.6. Both images were taken at a shutter speed of 1/60th sec. On the G1 X we needed ISO 6400 to achieve this shutter speed. On the Olympus, thanks to the fast lens, we could reduce the sensitivity to ISO 1000 and still achieve a similar exposure. The G1 X image still looks a little cleaner but it's probably fair to say that in shooting situations that require high sensitivities the XZ-1's faster lens offsets quite a large proportion of the Canon's advantage in terms of sensor performance.

Canon G1 X, ISO 6400, F5.6, 1/60 sec Olympus XZ-1, ISO 1000, F2.2, 1/60 sec
100% crop 100% crop
Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 14

The G1X proves that a bigger sensor or camera is no guarantee for better pictures. The badly designed sensor with leak of dynamic range in combination with a low budget lens is the right receipt for a crappy camera.

In more detail, The fact that the dynamic range of the camera is so limited that skyś are always bleached out and even in raw, detail recovery is not possible to an acceptable level, this camera is useless for travel, landscape and city scape photography,

The lens is really disappointing. lots of distortion at the wide and tele end. Also the shortest focus range, is absolutely unacceptable.

The optical viewer is totally UN-usable.

My 6 years old Canon G-10 out performs the G1X in all situations accept low light.

I was tempted by the big sensor and big price reduction, now that the G1X MK2 is on the market, But this is without doubt the wurst camera i owned as long as i can remember.


Looks ideal for anyone who would typically buy a DSLR and never change the kit lens - this has the benefit of being smaller and lighter plus the lens is a bit ‘faster’ and longer than a typical kit lens.

The only negatives I can see compared to a DSLR with kit lens is AF speed, zoom speed and the ViewFinder.

It costs a bit more than most entry level DSLRs also but the price will drop in time.


The operation is very slow.


G1X 15.1mm-60.4mm Zoom Lens
Max.Ap.Diam: 5.4mm (15.1/2.8) Wide
Max.Ap.Diam: 10.4mm (60.4/5.8) Tele
Horiz.AoV: 63.53° Wide
Horiz.AoV: 17.6° Tele


Still the same flimsy, delicate lens and leaf design, I assume. No thanks.
After both a G10 and a G16 succumbed to 'shutter error' (the G16 within a week), it's manual transmission for me from now on. Something I make work by twisting with my fingers.
Come to think of it, I lose count of the number of my devices which have died simply because the 'automated' systems failed. VCR's, tape-decks, Minidisk players, and now cameras.


I bought a G1X 2 weeks ago from a person that bought it for his wife for Christmas. She found it too much camera for her needs and so I bought it with about 10 shots total for $400. I usually shoot with a Nikon D300 and the Nikon higher priced lenses. For underwater and a light carry around I had a G10 for 5 years. After 2 weeks of shooting I must say that I'm amazed by the IQ of the photos this camera puts out. Low light shots up to ISO 1600 are allot better than my D300. It's not a perfect camera but then non of them are. Ordered a Canon 500D close up lens for it after seeing how well that worked on Marco Nero's photos with the G1X on . This camera also shoots some very good underwater photos from examples I have seen on the internet so I picked up Canon's case on sale for my trips south. All told I think that although this camera is not for everyone most owners give it at least an 8/10. has another good review, great landscape photos

Comment edited 51 seconds after posting
1 upvote

I've been wanting this camera since it was announced. I'm primarily a DSLR shooter, and FF at that. I also have owned a G6 and currently G10 and S110. So, I'm pretty familiar with where this camera fits in and what a step it is for Canon to take.
I just bought a used version at a very nice price so will be trying it out in the near future.
I would have rated the camera a little higher, based on my past experience with Canon and reports I've read from reviews and owners. Particularly, Optics and Performance would have got a couple ticks up in my estimation. I think a 79 or 80 would have been appropriate -- being practically in a category of its own: attached zoom, large sensor, compact camera.
It won't be a camera for everyone, true. But if you want better IQ than P&S and use it as a second camera to your DSLR for quick grab shots and take-anywhere convenience, you should be well served! :)

1 upvote
jan snks

Image quality G1X, dpreview reports "excellent image quality across the ISO range without nasty surprises".
I would like to refer to the review of this camera. They reported a nasty Light Leakage phenomenon at higher ISO settings and short shutter times. This defect seems to be confirmed by Canon.
Would anybody comment on this ?


I've noticed that the g1x took this studio shot at f7.1 , while other "enthusiast" compacts (g15 or p7700...) at f4.5. Could somebody explain me why's that? It would be nice to know the shutter speed too. Thanks

Richard Butler

It's to offer enough depth-of-field (it's a 3D target).

This has a sensor much bigger than the others, so needs to be stopped-down further in order to provide enough depth-of-field.


Please sorry my ignorance, but to achieve this it has to use a slower shutter speed too or, thanks to the higher light-catching capabilities of the bigger sensor the g1x uses comparable shutter speeds as, say, the g15 or p7700 , with a smaller aperture?


If Canon increases DR able to at least match T2i and updates its Panorama mode (similar to the Sony's would be great), this would be true compact I'm looking for. I'll buy it no doubts!


Almost but not there yet.


G1x Cannons almost camera
Almost an APS-C sensor, Almost a good EVF, Almost enough lens magnification, Almost small enough. A good first try for a company that just started designing cameras.

Total comments: 14