Previous page Next page

Compared to...

Studio scene comparison (RAW)

For a (more) level playing field for comparison we also shot our studio scene in RAW mode with each camera and converted it using Adobe Camera RAW. Because Adobe Camera RAW applies different levels of sharpening to different cameras (this confirmed) we had to use the following workflow for these conversions:

  • Load RAW file into Adobe Camera RAW (Auto mode disabled)
  • Set Sharpness to 0 (all other settings default)
  • Open file to Photoshop
  • Apply a Unsharp mask: 80%, Radius 1.0, Threshold 0
  • Save as a TIFF (for cropping) and as a JPEG quality 11 for download

This is our standard studio scene comparison shot taken from exactly the same tripod position. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F). Camera settings as per previous pages.

Canon EOS 40D (RAW) vs. Nikon D200 (RAW)

Canon EOS 40D (RAW)
Nikon D200 (RAW)
3,120 KB JPEG (3888 x 2592)

3,073 KB JPEG (3872 x 2592)

Switching to our benchmark RAW converter, Adobe Camera RAW equalizes image processing between the two cameras and allows us to get a much better idea of the level of detail actually captured. As you can see both cameras images look crisper and exhibit better detail. Overall it would be difficult to pick a clear winner between these two, it would be fair to say that in this scenario they both deliver the same detail.

Previous page Next page
532
I own it
5
I want it
453
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

figoral
By figoral (4 months ago)

the new version looks better in the statistics but for my needs the EOS 30D is sufficient. Regards
http://www.teletechnika-system.pl/

0 upvotes