|
|
|||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISO 100 | ||
| Canon EOS-10D 1/40 sec, F7.1 |
Canon EOS-D60 1/40 sec, F7.1 |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
| ISO 200 | ||
| Canon EOS-10D 1/80 sec, F7.1 |
Canon EOS-D60 1/80 sec, F7.1 |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
| ISO 400 | ||
| Canon EOS-10D 1/160 sec, F7.1 |
Canon EOS-D60 1/160 sec, F7.1 |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
| ISO 800 | ||
| Canon EOS-10D 1/320 sec, F7.1 |
Canon EOS-D60 1/320 sec, F7.1 |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
| ISO 1600 | ||
| Canon EOS-10D 1/640 sec, F7.1 |
Canon EOS-D60 n/a |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
| ISO 3200 (H) | ||
| Canon EOS-10D 1/1250 sec, F7.1 |
Canon EOS-D60 n/a |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
As we had expected these test results were virtually identical to those produced for our pre-production preview. Things seem fairly close at ISO 100 and 200, at ISO 400 the EOS-10D is beginning to look cleaner, at ISO 800 the difference is more noticeable and the EOS-10D's ISO 1600 performance is very good indeed, actually exhibiting less noise than the EOS-D60 at ISO 800. It would appear that Canon's changes to image processing (probably enhanced high sensitivity noise reduction) and improved CMOS manufacturing processes have made a more significant difference to noise at higher ISO's.

ISO sensitivity is on the horizontal axis of this graph, standard deviation (average) is on the vertical axis.

ISO sensitivity is on the vertical axis of this graph, standard deviation (average) is on the horizontal axis.