Resolution Chart Comparison (JPEG and Raw)
Images on this page are of our standard resolution chart which provides for measurement of resolution up to 4000 LPH (Lines Per Picture Height). A value of 20 equates to 2000 lines per picture height. For each camera we use the relevant prime lens (the same one we use for all the other tests in a particular review). The chart is shot at a full range of apertures and the sharpest image selected. Studio light, cameras set to aperture priority (optimum aperture selected), image parameters default. Exposure compensation set to deliver approximately 80% luminance in the white areas.
What we want to show here is how well the camera is able to resolve the detail in our standard test chart compared to the theoretical maximum resolution of the sensor, which for the charts we shoot is easy to work out - it's simply the number of vertical pixels (the chart shows the number of single lines per picture height, the theoretical limit is 1 line per pixel). Beyond this limit (which when talking about line pairs is usually referred to as the Nyquist frequency) the sensor cannot faithfully record image detail and aliasing occurs.
This limit is rarely attained, because the majority of sensors are fitted with anti-aliasing filters. Anti-aliasing filters are designed to reduce unpleasant moiré effects, but in doing so, they also reduce resolution (the relative strength and quality of these filters varies from camera to camera). In theory though, a sensor without an AA filter, when coupled with a 'perfect' lens, will deliver resolution equal to its Nyquist limit. Therefore, even though it may be effectively unattainable with normal equipment in normal shooting situations, an understanding of a sensor's theoretical limit provides a useful benchmark for best possible performance. Nyquist is indicated in these crops with a red line.
On this page we're looking at both JPEG and Raw resolution. For a (more) level playing field we convert the latter using Adobe Camera Raw. Because Adobe Camera Raw applies different levels of sharpening to different cameras (this confirmed) we use the following workflow for these conversions:
- Load Raw file into Adobe Camera Raw (Auto mode disabled)
- Set Sharpness to 0 (all other settings default)
- Open file to Photoshop
- Apply a Unsharp mask tuned to the camera, here 180%, Radius 0.4, Threshold 0
- Make 100% crops and save the original file at JPEG quality 11 for download
|JPEG (5760 x 3840) 4.5MB||JPEG (5760 x 3840) 5.4MB|
The EOS 5D Mark III's image is marginally larger than its predecessor's and the EOS 1Ds Mark III's but the per-pixel sharpness is pretty much identical and in practice the difference is, at low ISOs, negligible. The Mark III resolves around 2800 LPH which makes it a very decent choice for those who have a need for large amounts of detail in their images. The sample shot of our resolution chart is also very clean, without any visible artifacts or moiré patterns.
Processing with Adobe Camera Raw and then applying customized sharpening squeezes additional detail out of the image. You get 'some' detail almost up to Nyquist frequency. Again, the image is clean without artifacts or moire. This is pretty much the performance you would expect from a camera with a 22MP pixel count and a good quality lens.
Canon EOS 5D Mark III - SLR Digital Camera (Body only)
Canon EOS 5D Mark III 24 - 105 Kit Digital SLR (DSLR) Camera
Canon Digital SLR Camera EOS 5D Mark II
Canon EOS 600D Digital SLR Camera
(inc. 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens Kit)
CANON EOS 5D MARK III
+ 24-70 II L USM + 70-200 IS USM II
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Body
Canon EOS 700D Digital SLR Camera - (EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Lens,...
Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)
Canon EOS 6D Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)