PIX 2015
Previous page Next page


The 5D Mark III comes with a new AF system that is, in terms of specification, very close to the flagship EOS 1D X. It comes with 61 points, 41 of which are cross-type points and, uniquely to this sensor, five of them are diagonally sensitive (for these double cross-type, imagine an X overlaid on a + shape).

When used with lenses with a maximum aperture of F5.6 or brighter, the 5D Mark III is unmatched in terms of the number of cross type points it offers (21). Use an F4 or brighter lens and the advantage becomes even greater, with the camera gaining another 20 cross-type points that are further out from the center of the frame (Nikon's system only features cross-type sensors near the middle of the frame). Fit an F2.8 or brighter lens and the five central double-cross-type sensors become available.

The 5D Mark III only loses out to the Nikon D4 and D800 when it comes to use with slower lenses or long lens/teleconverter combinations, in that its cross-type points can only be used with lenses that are F5.6 or brighter. Canon says there's a trade-off to be made and that its approach allows the sensor to be more accurate with the large aperture lenses it expects its customers to use, and allows the F4 cross-type sensors to be placed further towards the edge of the frame.

And, while the system doesn't have the 1D X's 100,000 pixel metering sensor, it still has a 63-point, color-aware metering sensor (a Foveon-esque two-layer affair), to help the camera track subjects.

F2.8 or brighter
F5.6 or brighter

The other key improvement is the simplification of the AF configuration. Previous high-end Canons have had very capable AF systems but have required fairly extensive training to correctly optimize them for the subject being shot. The 5D Mark III, like the 1D X, has a greatly simplified system for configuration, based on use-case presets.

AF configuration is complex compared to the 5D Mark II. But it's greatly simplified compared to the EOS-1D Mark IV, with a choice of 6 use-cases. The three parameters (tracking sensitivity, acceleration/deceleration tracking and willingness to switch AF points) can all be adjusted to more precisely tailor the presets to your favoured subject and shooting style.
The AF menu allows you to configure in detail precisely how you'd like the AF system to function, across fully five tabs of options.

Some of these have simply been ordered more coherently compared to where they were on the 5D Mark II, but there's a load of additional settings too, most of which are shared with the EOS-1D X.
You can choose which AF points you want the camera to use or allow you to select manually. The second setting - 'Only cross-type AF points' - takes into account the maximum aperture of the lens you're currently using.
AF microadjustment now allows you to program-in different settings for the two ends of a zoom. You can also enter an identification number for the specific the copy of the lens you're using.

We are no sports photographers but we can say that the simplified AF options are a great help when shooting moving subjects. We tested the EOS 5D Mark III's AF system with a 70-200mm F4L lens at an amateur soccer match, and even with our limited sports shooting skills got a very large proportion of usable shots. With the AF mode set to 'AI Servo' and the AF Case 4 'For subjects that accelerate or decelerate quickly' the camera locks onto a subject and tracks it reliably while shooting a burst.

The sample series below is representative for the kind of results we got. We locked focus on the player in the red shirt. The AF system tracks the subject but appears to get slightly confused when the subject is surrounded by other players. As a result in frames 5 and 6 the subject is very slightly soft, but even these shots would be usable on the web or at smaller formats. The AF also recovers quickly, with the subject in perfect focus again in the following shots.

Frame 1
Frame 2
Frame 3
Frame 4
Frame 5
Frame 6
Frame 7
Frame 8

In single AF mode the EOS 5D Mark III's AF performs very well, too, even in very low light, despite the lack of an AF-assist lamp. Rated down to EV-2, which is equivalent to moonlight, we've been constantly impressed by the ability of the 5D III's AF system to get solid focus in light where the 5D Mark II would have been completely unable to operate.

However, one thing to be aware of when shooting with wide apertures on a full-frame camera is the very little tolerance you have in terms of depth of field. When focusing on an image area outside the center of the frame it is advisable to move the AF point rather than using the center point and recompose. If you get consistent focus errors the camera's micro adjustment function can help, but in general it can still be a a good idea to focus bracket when shooting at longer focal lengths and wide apertures.

The camera's AF system works reliably and swiftly, even in low light. This picture was taken indoors at ISO 6400, 1/60 sec and F4.
And here's an even lower-light shot. Taken at ISO 25,600 at a shutter speed of 1/100sec and an aperture of f/5.6 the image in the viewfinder was barely bright enough for image composition yet the 5D III has captured a perfectly focussed, well-exposed image.

The contrast detect AF in Live View is still significantly slower than the standard phase-detect system. But this latest generation is now fast enough to make Live View a viable alternative for specialist applications such as macro or studio still life, or when the positioning of the camera makes it difficult to use the viewfinder.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 20


I am new to the Canon brand and was considering a 5D3 or a 7D2. I need a camera that captures images and short video clips of very fast sports at close and far ranges. So for me, speed, image quality, and movie quality are the most important.

Edit: I should add that the sports are indoor but very fast, and I usually cannot use flash, so I have to work with what's available.

If there is another camera that you recommend beyond these two, please let me know. I have only used a Nikon D4S in the past which did well but I can no longer use that. Thanks in advance and sorry if this is a low-level question.

Comment edited 7 minutes after posting

First test ever here the 5d mark iii filming in 4k http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=9041.0 Magic lantern also unlock Raw

Pascal Parvex

It is not filming in 4K, it is still 1080p. It was just uprezzed (DNG files).


your right


I am owner of 5d mark III.
I ll totally disagre about noise free image of mark III.
Camera make iso free, but with jpg image, where is use in camera noise filter.
I can do it in photoshop with any camera.
More important, and no one talk about that, raw image on 1600!! iso have noise, 3200 and more, have lot of noise.
And second thing, image on higher noise are not sharp!


Which lenses you use?

1 upvote
Abel Sy

Hello, I've just bought a 5D3 W/ 24 - 105MM lens, upon playing w/ it, looking for the command for multiple shots, the auto focus was affected and not wokring anymore. I don't know and can not make it back to original setting. Is somebody there know and tell me what to do? please help.
P.S. I tried the lens to put in another camera and it works, and attached another lens to 5d3, but didn't work as well. so I confirmed that the problem is the setting w/in the body.


A minor nitpick: Canon's first 35mm autofocus SLR was not the EOS 650 but the T80.


Hello i just need a professional opinion....is the Canon 5D Mark III suitable for broadcast?

1 upvote
Pascal Parvex

No one has answered, so here is an non-professional opinion: Should be. Since the Mark II, the 5D series has gotten some heavy use in broadcasting.


I have used the 5D Mark III for over a year and have just finished selling my Nikon gear (sad day after being a Nikon enthusiast for 30 plus years). From auto-focus to camera build to overall quality, this camera can do it all! Even with the slow burst rate, it works well for sports and nature shooting! I can't recommend this camera enough. I have found the auto-focus system to be quick enough for Equestrian events with long lenses, such as Canons 400mm f2.8 or new 200-560mm.


I have just bought a 5d mkii, and when doing a comparison test (nothing scientific) against my 50d I find that the 5d3 seems to under expose by upto 1stop, is this normal?


I work in Nyc as a fashion photographer and I have to say the the 5d series are the most used cameras out side of medium format cameras .Ive been shooting with the mark 3 for over a year after shooting with the mark 2 for 2 years great both great cameras. You can see the shots I've taken with it on my website www.brianschutzaphotography.com hope it helps!!

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting

Nice shots,...I've always dreamed to be a fashion photographer.

Cyrus the Great

Nikon D800 is clear winer over 5D iii in every things. Nikon has much sharper lens.
don't know why some people buy Canon???!!!!!

1 upvote
R D Carver

'Some people' buy Canon because they earn their living using a camera. Oh man, you should see those forests of white and red-ringed lenses in the pro pit at every major sporting, media and news event! 'Some people' are winning the major competitions, filling the fashion and nature magazines and filming box office busting movies with Canon. "Nikon has much sharper lens" Which lens exactly? Give a photographer a Canon 5D MKIII and an EF 70-200mm F/2.8 L IS II USM Lens and he can take on the world. Nikon is good, Canon is good why get tribal? it is so petty and amateur. At work I can pick up a Nikon/Sony D800 body or a Cannon 5D MKIII. I prefer the Cannon because I don't like the white balance on the Nikon. Others are happy to use the Nikon, but the die hard Nikon enthusiasts are disappointed that Sony make the sensors for Nikon. In comes Sony in comes the green tinged white balance.


No cameras white balance is perfectly neutral. That's why we have the ability to manually change it on the camera and even fine tune on some of the higher end models. Nikon cameras do run slightly toward the cool side, but they can always be fine-tuned to be neutral in-camera. Canon cameras have always leaned towards the orange color tint. Luckily for Canon the end result is a slightly warmer image that many photographers like the looks of. Few pros would buy a camera that couldn't be made to produce true colors. And that forest of white lenses has been thinning out quite a bit since the advent of the Nikon D3. I'm one die-hard Nikon enthusiast who's ecstatic with Sony sensors. No other brand can even match their dynamic range.

Comment edited 6 minutes after posting
1 upvote

why is the D800 is the clear winner? because of a few test charts? which camera do you own? the 5DM3 or the D800? i switched from nikon to canon because i liked canon's lenses better.

ever been to a major sporting event or a press conference? if you did you'd notice an abundance of off-white telephoto lenses with red rings on them. saying that "some people buy Canon" is misleading because pretty much everyone who makes a living off their camera gear uses Canon. and believe me, there are very good reasons for that. if you don't know what they are then it will be a waste of time trying to explain them to you. you still wont get it because you are too busy looking at test charts.


The Nikon 85 1.2 and 200 1.8 is better than the Canon ones... oh wait, no, it was the 8-15 f4. ;)


thx for putting the Shadow noise test in your review. it was time to show that quite big difference.

Total comments: 20