PIX 2015
Previous page Next page

Compared to... Canon EOS 1-Ds Mark III

Studio scene comparison (JPEG)

This is our standard studio scene comparison shot taken from exactly the same tripod position. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F).

Sony DSLR-A900 vs Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III

Camera settings:

  • Sony DSLR-A900: Sony 85 mm F1.4 ZA Planar lens, Aperture Priority, ISO 200 JPEG Large/Fine,
    Manual WB, Default Parameters (Standard), Self-Timer
  • Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III: Canon EF 85mm f1.8 USM lens, Aperture Priority, ISO 100 (default base) JPEG Large/Fine, Manual WB, Default Parameters (Standard), Self-Timer
Sony A900
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III
6.1 MB JPEG (6048 x 4032)
5.3 MB JPEG (5616 x 3744)

Although there's a significant difference in price (the EOS-1Ds Mark III is, after all, a professional camera), this is as near to a 'level playing field' comparison as we're yet able to show (until Canon ships a production quality EOS 5D Mark II). The resolution difference is marginal (around 10% more pixels in each direction), and you can see this translates to a very similar level of detail being captured, though again you can see how much sharper the Canon JPEG is - both in terms of edge contrast (per pixel sharpness) and in terms of the level of software sharpening applied. That all said, the differences aren't huge (and are mostly a reflection of Canon's superior JPEG processing) and next to a camera costing more than twice as much the Alpha 900 stands up remarkably well.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums
Oops. We couldn't find the price for this product. Click here to search for this product on Amazon.



The new model definitely is worth the money. It is a big upgrade compared to the A700!