|
|
|||
|
![]() Standard Test Scene |
To give an impression of what some of the combinations of image size and quality produce the table below is a cross reference of some of them:
Crops below are of the same 240 x 100 area of each image nearest neighbour magnified 200%.
| 8M: 3264 x 2448 | |
| RAW | ![]() 16,986 KB .SRF + 3,799 KB JPEG (not for download), VGA crop - 541 KB .TIF |
| TIFF | ![]() 23,413 KB .TIF + 3,792 KB JPEG (not for download), VGA crop - 587 KB .TIF |
| JPEG Fine |
![]() 3,804 KB |
| JPEG Std. |
![]() 2,018 KB |
| 5M: 2592 x 1944 | |
| JPEG Fine |
![]() 2,245 KB |
| JPEG Std. |
![]() 1,272 KB |
| 3M: 2048 x 1536 | |
| JPEG Fine |
![]() 1,410 KB |
| 1M: 1280 x 960 | |
| JPEG Fine |
![]() 558 KB |
To my eye at least there is virtually no difference between the output of Image Data Converter converted RAW's and TIFF/JPEG images straight from the camera. The difference of course is that Image Data Converter provides a certain amount of adjustment to the images before they are converted to the final format. Otherwise quality is as we expect, some JPEG artifacts appearing in the higher compression images, some slight sharpening 'halo' artifacts around dark detail.