|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISO 100 | ISO 100 | |
| Sigma SD9 1/6 sec, F5.6 |
Canon EOS-D60 1/5 sec, F5.6 |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
| ISO 200 | ISO 200 | |
| Sigma SD9 1/10 sec, F5.6 |
Canon EOS-D60 1/10 sec, F5.6 |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
| ISO 400 | ISO 400 | |
| Sigma SD9 1/20 sec, F5.6 |
Canon EOS-D60 1/20 sec, F5.6 |
|
| Original crop | ![]() |
|
| Red channel | ||
| Green channel | ||
| Blue channel | ||
As you can see noise levels are really quite similar, the most notable difference is that the SD9's noise is spread fairly equally throughout the color channels (as we would expect) where as the EOS-D60's noise is more visible in the red channel. The other thing which isn't immediately visible is the fact that the SD9's noise has a finer 'grain' to it, that's because each individual pixel can be affected by noise without necessarily affecting its neighbour, unlike with a mosaic sensor.
Luminance noise graph

Note that ISO sensitivity is on the horizontal axis of this graph. As noted above noise levels are fairly close and follow roughly the same line of increment.
RGB noise graph

Note that ISO sensitivity is on the vertical axis of this graph. As we noted above the SD9's noise is fairly equally balanced between each color channel, unlike a mosaic sensor which tends to have noisier red or blue channels.

Red hue noise
UPDATE May 2003: Today Sigma / Foveon posted a new version of the PhotoPro RAW conversion software, this appears to have vastly improved noise reduction / image output algorithms which have significantly reduced any specific noise in red hues. You can read my comparison of the old and new PhotoPro software by clicking here.
| Bookmark: | ||||
| Actions: | < Previous | Next > | Print page |
Please wait, fetching latest prices.
The
Sigma SD9 has three selectable sensitivities of ISO 100, 200 and 400.


