
White Balance
Automatic white balance on the Optio S worked fairly
well in natural light but left images looking very orange under artificial
light. The preset white balance setting for incandescent light produced
a near perfect color balance, however the single fluorescent preset produced
an identical result to auto mode. As we would hope manual white balance
was the best option for accurate color in any light source.
 |
 |
 |
| Outdoors, Auto |
Outdoors, Sunny (or Shade) |
Outdoors, Manual |
 |
 |
 |
| Incandescent, Auto |
Incandescent, Incandescent |
Incandescent, Manual |
 |
 |
 |
| Fluorescent, Auto |
Fluorescent, Fluorescent |
Fluorescent, Manual |

Macro Focus
We really didn't expect much from the Optio S in the
macro department so were pleasantly surprised when we discovered that
in fact it is very capable. Switch the camera to Super-Macro mode and
the lens is locked at half zoom, at the closest possible focus distance
(6 cm) this produced a frame coverage of 35 mm (1.4 in). For an ultra-compact
digital camera this is unheard of. Kudos Pentax.

Flash Performance
The flash unit in the Optio S has a specified range (at ISO 200) of 3.5
m (11.5 ft) at wide angle and 2.0 m (6.6 ft) at telephoto. In our tests
flash shots exhibited no color cast and fairly good (if conservative)
exposure. The Optio S has no provision for flash power compensation.
 |
 |
| Skin tone - Good exposure
(slightly under exposed), no color cast, natural skin color |
Color patches - Good color
balance, good flash power, exposure could have done with a little
more power |

Night exposures
The Optio S has limited night exposure capability because of its maximum
1 second shutter speed even in night scene mode. This is a huge pity because
ISO 50 shots at 1 second exhibit hardly any visible noise, if Pentax had
allowed exposures of up to 8 seconds the Optio S would have at least a
usable night exposure capability. As things stand they only option you
have available is to increase sensitivity to ISO 100 or 200, but this
unfortunately introduces noise which can be hard to remove.
 |
 |
| Night exposure: ISO 100, 1 sec,
F2.6 |
 |
 |
| Night exposure: ISO 200, 1 sec,
F2.6 |

Barrel and Pincushion Distortion
It's design may be a technical marvel but the Optio S lens
does suffer from noticeable barrel distortion at wide angle, slightly
more than we are used to seeing on an ultra-compact digital camera. Luckily
things are better at the telephoto end of zoom where there is no measurable
pincushion distortion.
 |
 |
| Barrel Distortion, 1.4% @ wide
angle |
Pincushion Distortion, none @
telephoto |

Vignetting / Light fall off
Our vignetting / light fall off test is very simple, a
shot of a blank wall from two meters away, vignetting will always be most
visible at wide angle and maximum aperture and will start to disappear
at smaller apertures and/or further zoom. The Optio S exhibited some vignetting
at wide angle, specifically on the right hand corners of the image. It
is possible that such vignetting could be seen in certain shots.
 |
 |
| Slight corner vignetting visible
at wide angle and maximum aperture (F2.6) |
No vignetting at telephoto |

Purple Fringing (Chromatic Aberrations)
The Optio S did exhibit some purple fringing near the corners
/ edges of images shot at wide angle and maximum aperture (F2.6). As you
can see from the crops below it seldom extends more than one or two pixels
and isn't particularly strong. This is undoubtedly a consequence of the
tiny lens system.
 |
 |
| Some fringing visible in the corners of shots
with high contrast |
Our standard chromatic aberration test shot |

Overall Image Quality / Specific Issues
Overall the Optio S delivered relatively good images with
very little noise (at ISO 50), moderately good resolution and no major
artifact problems. Color balance is good, as is tonal balance which tends
towards maintaining shadow detail rather than trying to be too 'punchy',
of course you can modify the output from the camera by changing the image
processing parameters in the record menu. One note may be that images
can occasionally look a little soft and that higher ISO images do look
as though they have been processed (noise reduction?).
Bottom of lens softness
One thing I did notice in images taken at wide angle and
maximum aperture (F2.6) was a softness along the bottom of the image and
most notably in the bottom left or right corners. Anyone who knows a little
about lenses will expect the corners of the image to be softer at maximum
aperture (especially for such a small lens), however this was more noticeable
along the entire bottom of the image and stronger in the bottom corners
than the top. It appears as though this issue may vary from one camera
to the next as the Casio EX-Z3 (same lens) we had for review didn't suffer
quite as noticeably.
 |
 |
| Our standard ISO resolution chart |
Bottom left corner and bottom 'strip' of image
softer than the rest |
 |
 |
| Note that this image has been rotated 90°
clockwise and so softness is now down the left edge |
Lens softness along the left edge of the rotated
image (this was the bottom of the image before rotation) |
|