Previous page Next page

Compared to...

Studio scene comparison (RAW)

See previous page for RAW workflow.

This is our standard studio scene comparison. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F). Camera settings as per previous pages.

Olympus E-420 (RAW) vs. Canon EOS 450D (RAW)

Olympus E-420 (RAW)
Canon EOS 450D (RAW)
2,615 KB JPEG (3648 x 2736)
3.7MB JPEG (4272 x 2848)

The EOS 450D benefits a little more from use of Adobe Camera RAW than the Olympus, allowing you to squeeze even more detail out of the Canon. The E-420 is quite significantly softer at sensor level and while you can apply a little more sharpening this could of course also lead to visible sharpening artifacts and it won't increase the pixel level detail that's missing from the file..

Previous page Next page
51
I own it
0
I want it
47
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

AARTHu

I bought this oldie digital as a first experience vith digital cameras, even still use film mainly. So may it was a wrong decision, but I stay beside classic film photography. This camera slow, cheap and only manual mode able to firing promptly. I missed such a moments just because it wait so much before release the shutter. The lens as it is, so far from my zeiss with contax 35mm. Obviously nonsense to compare 66 rolleiflex images. There are lots of set up features, but practically takes long time to modify them, which disturb so much the picture taking. The CF card door a slim plastic door, very fragile. The viewfinder very small. All around this model are far away any real reflex cameras, it seems who design it just never take pictures with a proper camera. I can not recommend this camera, better to smash them all in the name of photography.

0 upvotes