|
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikon D2H | Canon EOS-1D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Olympus E-1 | Canon EOS 10D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikon D2H | Canon EOS-1D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Olympus E-1 | Canon EOS 10D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikon D2H | Canon EOS-1D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Olympus E-1 | Canon EOS 10D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikon D2H | Canon EOS-1D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Olympus E-1 | Canon EOS 10D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikon D2H | Canon EOS-1D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Olympus E-1 | Canon EOS 10D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikon D2H | Canon EOS-1D |
![]() |
![]() |
| Olympus E-1 | Canon EOS 10D |
Measurable findings (three measurements taken for each camera):
| Camera | Measurement | Absolute Res. | Extinction Res. |
| Nikon D2H | Horiz LPH | 1400 | * 1600 |
| Vert LPH | 1200 | * 1550 | |
| 5° Diagonal LPH | 1000 | n/a | |
| Canon EOS-1D | Horiz LPH | 1400 | * 1700 |
| Vert LPH | 1200 | * 1700 | |
| 5° Diagonal LPH | 1000 | n/a | |
| Olympus E-1 | Horiz LPH | * 1400 | * 1700 |
| Vert LPH | * 1250 | * 1650 | |
| 5° Diagonal LPH | * 1000 | n/a | |
| Canon EOS 10D | Horiz LPH | 1600 | 1900 |
| Vert LPH | 1450 | 1850 | |
| 5° Diagonal LPH | 1000 | n/a |
* Visible moiré pattern
Definition of terms:
| LPH | Lines per Picture Height (to allow for different aspect ratios the measurement is the same for horizontal and vertical) |
| 5° Diagonal | Lines set at 5° diagonal |
| Absolute Resolution | Still defined detail (below Nyquist frequency*) |
| Extinction Resolution | Detail beyond camera's definition (becomes a solid gray alias) |
| n/a | Not Available (above the capability of the test chart) |
| n/v | Not Visible (not visible on test results) |
* Nyquist frequency defined as the
highest spatial frequency where the sensor can
still faithfully record image detail. Beyond the Nyquist frequency aliasing
occurs.
The Nikon D2H delivers a very similar resolution performance as the Canon EOS-1D. This isn't that surprising, it's about as much as we would expect to see from a four megapixel (digital SLR) sensor and is very respectable. Remember that in our comparison of RAW vs. JPEG earlier in this review the RAW converted resolution chart had slightly more resolution and less visible artifacts.
| Bookmark: | ||||
| Actions: | < Previous | Next > | Print page |
Please wait, fetching latest prices.























