Conclusion - Pros
Conclusion - Cons
Overall conclusionThe Coolpix 8400's unique lens makes it an interesting beast, it offers a slightly wider field of view (about 10° more; 72° horizontally at 24 mm equiv.) than other prosumer eight megapixel digital cameras which start at 28 mm equiv. That extra 10° can be especially useful if you shoot a lot of architecture, landscapes, real estate etc. At the other end of zoom however it has the least telephoto of any current eight megapixel, its nearest competitor, the Olympus C-8080 WZ offers 28 - 140 mm equiv. (compared to the 8400's 24 - 85 mm equiv.) From a distortion and artifacts point of view the 8400's lens performed well, fairly low distortion and essentially no detectable purple fringing. However when compared to other prosumer cameras it wasn't quite as sharp at the edges or corners of the frame (center of frame was about the same). Performance wise it's slightly quicker than the 8700 on which it is based, however it can't be seen as a giant leap forward. Every once in a while one camera stands out and sets a trend, the Olympus C-8080 Wide Zoom is one such camera, it's fast, well built and has excellent image quality. In addition the new seven megapixel digital cameras are delivering excellent results. With such tough competition the 8400 had a lot to do, and it didn't quite make it. All that said I still have no problem recommending this camera to those who need an extra wide angle compact prosumer digital camera with eight megapixels.
Want to make
sure you don't miss out on any future reviews? |
| Bookmark: | ||||
| Actions: | < Previous | Next > | Print page |
Please wait, fetching latest prices.
