
Compared to the Minolta DiMAGE 7i
The Minolta DiMAGE 7i was announced almost two months before
the Coolpix 5700, although is definitely targetted into the same portion
of the market, big zoom 5 megapixel prosumer. Here we'll be doing a direct
head to head comparison with the 7i in our controlled studio scene test.
Camera settings were:
- Nikon Coolpix 5700: Tone: Normal, Sharpening: Normal, Saturation:
0, NR Off, Manual WB
- Minolta DiMAGE 7i: Saturation: 0, Contrast: 0, Color mode:
Natural, Sharpness: Normal,
Manual WB
Studio scene comparison
This is our standard studio scene comparison shot taken from the same
tripod position. Lighting: 2 x 800W studio lights with dichroic daylight
filters bounced off a white ceiling reflector. Crops magnified 200%.
| Nikon
Coolpix 5700 |
Minolta DiMAGE 7i |
| ISO 100, F5.4, 1/3.6
sec |
ISO 100, F5.6, 1/4
sec |
  |
| 1,594 KB JPEG |
1,973 KB JPEG |
 |
There's a lot to talk about here. From a pure resolution
point of view the 5700 is certainly able to resolve finer details. Colour
balance is different, the 5700 has gone for a more vivid look, the D7i
better preserves colour detail with less saturation. That said both cameras
provide control over colour saturation output. Noise levels in medium
tones are also notably different, the D7i exhibitting noticeably more
noise than the 5700. The D7i has visible speckled luminance on the majority
of mid tones, naturally less so with a higher signal (lighter areas of
the image).
The 5700's demosaic algorithm appears to be more sophisticated
than the D7i providing a more film like look to detail than the D7i. The
D7i manages to preserve highlight detail better than the 5700 which clipped
highlights on the edge of the silver spoons. Note also the 5700's 'colour
stepping' along the tip of the yellow crayon, this is almost identical
to what we saw in the 4500 review.
|