|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kodak DCS 760 |
Nikon D1x |
![]() |
![]() |
| Crops @ 100% | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The DCS 760's superior vertical resolution takes the award here, it's very clear looking at the second crop where we can see usable vertical resolution extending well into 1400 lines/picture height (the D1x loosing out at about 1150 lines/picture height). This can also be seen in slight angled horizontal lines (third crop) where the DCS 760 simply has more pixels to produce a smooth gradient, the D1x ends up with a stepped effect.
The second interesting thing was that the DCS 760 managed to clearly resolve just as much absolute horizontal resolution as the D1x. We call resolution quite conservatively before the point at which lines either start to merge or one line becomes 'thinner' (loses detail) compared to the rest. Obviously the D1x's ability to continue to resolve detail well past the DCS 760's extinction resolution is commendable, but it's clear that the DCS 760's sensor (without an anti-alias filter*) is a match for the D1x.
* This is important, remember than the D1x's anti-alias filter is attached directly to the sensor surface and will have a slight softening effect on image quality.
| Camera | Measurement | Absolute Res. | Extinction Res. |
| Kodak DCS 760 (RAW) |
Horiz LPH | 1500 | 1750 |
| Vert LPH | 1400 | 1750 | |
| 5o Diagonal LPH | 1000 | n/a | |
| Nikon D1x (RAW) |
Horiz LPH | 1500 | >2000 |
| Vert LPH * | 1150 | 1250 | |
| 5o Diagonal LPH | 900 | n/a |
| Bookmark: | ||||
| Actions: | < Previous | Next > | Print page |
Please wait, fetching latest prices.











