Previous page Next page

Compared to... Sony Alpha 900

Studio scene comparison (RAW)

See previous page for RAW conversion notes.

This is our standard studio scene comparison shot taken from exactly the same tripod position. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F). Camera settings as per previous pages.

Canon EOS 5D Mark II (RAW) vs. Sony Alpha A900 (RAW)

Camera settings:

  • Canon EOS 5D Mark II: Canon EF 85 mm F1.8 lens, Manual exposure,
    ISO 100, RAW, Manual WB, Default Parameters (Standard PS), Self-Timer
     
  • Sony DSLR-A900: Sony 85 mm F1.4 lens, Aperture Priority, ISO 200, RAW,
    Manual WB, Default Parameters (Standard), Self-Timer (auto MLU)
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Sony A900
5,607 KB JPEG (5616 x 3744)
6,238 KB JPEG (6048 x 4032)

The amount of fine detail resolved from the front of the Martini bottle is very similar from both of these cameras, but the 5D Mark II holds a slight advantage in all these crops. These are both RAW files output from Adobe Camera RAW, so this should be a level playing field. But ultimately the A900 - with what should be one of the best lenses you can buy for it - can't quite compete with the EOS 5D Mark II's pixel level sharpness.

Previous page Next page
1409
I own it
161
I want it
440
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

Total comments: 3
BobFoster

I work in Nyc as a fashion photographer and I have to say the the 5d series are the most used cameras out side of medium format cameras .Ive been shooting with the mark 3 for over a year after shooting with the mark 2 for 2 years great both great cameras. You can see the shots I've taken with it for my work on my website www.brianschutzaphotography.com hope it helps!! also note I only shoot RAW format.

1 upvote
EcoPix

Was it really 2009? I'm still in the first flush of my love affair with this camera. And I'm still fathoming the depths of its capability. Okay, she's got a lot of paint missing these days, but the images are still magic. Whenever I use another camera, I sigh and wonder why I didn't use the 5D2.
A brief history of photography:

silver chemistry

flexible roll film

Kodachrome

Velvia

5D Mark 2...

0 upvotes
reanim888

As I know when the original 5D debuted three years ago, it wasn't clear why most enthusiasts would want such a camera. Though it captured excellent, high resolution images, it was slower and bigger and more expensive. Today the market has changed significantly, and it's clear that the market is ready for full-frame digital SLRs that can turn out high image quality. High quality is one thing, but being a camera that can deliver high quality over a wide range of lighting conditions and different ISO settings is what makes the Canon 5D Mark II such a compelling choice, and a clear Dave's Picks.
It's really very very good.

1 upvote
Total comments: 3