|
|
|||
Five RAW converters comparedIn the comparisons below the JPEG and RAW images were taken within seconds of each other. The labels beside each sample equate to:
* These two converters are not final versions or did not officially support the EOS 20D, as soon as we can we will update this page with results from final versions. Color reproductionPlace your mouse over the label below the image to see the GretagMacbeth ColorChecker chart converted using each RAW converter. What's interesting is the fairly significant difference between JPEG / EVU and DPP in 'shot' mode (which is clearly nothing like a standard 'shot' from the camera). Also interesting is that the actual color hues of DPP Faithful, Adobe RAW and Bibble Pro are relatively similar. My personal preference (and visibly the most accurate) is DPP Faithful. The most balanced and least likely to slip into over-saturation or clipping are JPEG / EVU.
Sharpness and DetailIn the samples below the sharpness setting for each RAW converter was set to its default setting (except in the case of DDP where sharpness was set to 2; its default is no sharpening).
The immediate impression from these 100% crops is that JPEG straight out of the camera and EVU appear the sharpest but closer examination reveals that they also suffer from the most noticeable sharpening artifacts (halos). DPP, C1 Pro and Adobe RAW deliver good sharpness with almost none of the halo artifacts we're used to seeing.
ResolutionOut of camera JPEG and EVU deliver good sharpness although with obvious sharpening halos. Capture One Pro and Adobe Camera RAW deliver detail images with no sharpening artifacts. DPP once more has trouble with the resolution chart and exhibits some demosaicing and moire artifacts.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||