|
|
|||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Action | Details | Time,
seconds (SanDisk CF) |
Time,
seconds (Lexar CF) |
Time,
seconds (SanDisk SD) |
| Power: Off to On *1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
| Power: On to Off | <0.5 | <0.5 | <0.5 | |
| Record: Review *2 | RAW | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Record: Review *2 | JPEG | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Record: to Play *3 | RAW | 0.8 / 0.5 | 0.8 / 0.5 | 0.7 / 0.5 |
| Record: to Play *3 | JPEG | 1.1 / 0.6 | 1.2 / 0.6 | 1.1 / 0.6 |
| Play: Image to Image *3 | RAW | <0.5 / <0.1 | <0.5 / <0.1 | <0.5 / <0.1 |
| Play: Image to Image *3 | JPEG | 1.1 / <0.1 | 1.2 / <0.1 | 1.1 / <0.1 |
| *1 |
This timing was taken from the moment the power switch was turned to on to the moment a shot was taken (by holding down the shutter release from power on). |
| *2 | This is the amount of time between pressing the shutter release and the image being displayed on the LCD monitor. |
| *3 |
The Mark II appears to cache images which have been viewed recently to speed up browsing in play mode. The first timing is for the camera to load the image from the media card (if it has not already been cached), the second is if they have been viewed and cached by the camera. |
To test continuous mode the camera had the following settings: Manual Focus, Manual Exposure (1/250 sec, F3.5), ISO 100. The camera was aimed at a high speed stopwatch, the watch was started and a burst of frames were taken until the cameras buffer filled, as soon as the busy lamp on the storage compartment went out another single shot was taken to mark the 'flush after last frame' time difference. A second test was carried out to measure the buffer full continuous shooting speed (the speed at which the camera continues to shoot if you hold your finger on the shutter button after burst of shots).
| Continuous mode |
Measured speed |
Image type | Frames in a burst |
Flush after last frame | Buffer full speed |
| High | 8.33 fps | 3504 x 2336 RAW | 20 | 39.4 sec | 0.5 fps |
| 3504 x 2336 RAW+JPEG (L, q8) | 20 | 50.0 sec | 0.35 fps | ||
| 3504 x 2336 JPEG (L, q8) | 43 | 29.4 sec | 1.3 fps | ||
| 2544 x 1696 JPEG (M2, q8) | 70 | 28.0 sec | 2.0 fps | ||
| Low | 3.00 fps | 3504 x 2336 RAW | 22 | 40.3 sec | 0.5 fps |
| 3504 x 2336 RAW+JPEG (L, q8) | 20 | 48.4 sec | 0.35 fps | ||
| 3504 x 2336 JPEG (L, q8) | 63 | 31.3 sec | 1.3 fps | ||
| 2544 x 1696 JPEG (M2, q8) | 150 | 28.8 sec | 2.0 fps | ||
The results speak for themselves, the EOS-1D Mark II can push 8.33 x 8.2 megapixel images per second from its sensor (68 megapixel/sec) and has enough buffer space for twenty RAW images or 40 (or more) full resolution JPEG images. Drop output image size to around four megapixels and you can shoot 70 JPEG frames at 8.33 fps. Write speed is also very impressive, fill the camera's buffer and on average you'll be waiting around thirty seconds before the entire buffer is empty, a maximum of 50 seconds in the worst case.
Below are the results of our write performance tests on two CF and one SD card. The test is carried out by taking a full burst of shots and measuring the amount of time the storage card activity light is on, the amount of data written is then divided by this time to calculate the card throughput.
The biggest surprise was the performance of SanDisk's Ultra II SD card which out-performed the Compact Flash cards by some margin, especially in RAW mode where it was almost twice as fast delivering a blistering 6.5 MB/sec. Truly amazing.
| Card | Canon EOS-1D Mark II, write speed (JPEG L files) |
| 2 GB SanDisk Ultra II Type I CF |
|
| 4 GB Lexar Pro 40x Type II CF | |
| 512 MB SanDisk Ultra II SD |
| Card | Canon EOS-1D Mark II, write speed (RAW files) |
| 2 GB SanDisk Ultra II Type I CF |
|
| 4 GB Lexar Pro 40x Type II CF | |
| 512 MB SanDisk Ultra II SD |
| Card | Firewire Reader, write speed (RAW files) |
| 2 GB SanDisk Ultra II Type I CF |
|
| 4 GB Lexar Pro 40x Type II CF | |
| 512 MB SanDisk Ultra II SD |
Timings shown below are the time taken for the camera to process and "flush" the image out to the storage card. The Mark II will begin writing images as soon as it can and continue to write 'in the background' while you take further shots / change settings. You can not browse other images or enter the camera menu while images are being written to the storage card.
Below the number in (brackets) equates to the JPEG quality level which can be set through the camera's parameter menu. The quality level of 8 is the default, higher numbers mean higher quality and less compression.
The media used for this test were:
| Store | Time,
secs (SanDisk CF) |
Time,
secs (Lexar CF) |
Time,
secs (SanDisk SD) |
Approx. size |
Approx., 2 GB card |
| 3504 x 2336 RAW *1 | 2.14 | 2.78 | 1.22 | 8,100 KB | 185 |
| 3504 x 2336 RAW + JPEG *2 | 2.85 | 3.70 | 1.68 | 10,700 KB | 143 |
| 3504 x 2336 JPEG (L, q10) | 1.33 | 1.80 | 0.82 | 4,900 KB | 361 |
| 3504 x 2336 JPEG (L, q8) | 0.86 | 1.16 | 0.57 | 2,600 KB | 643 |
| 3504 x 2336 JPEG (L, q6) | 0.74 | 1.07 | 0.48 | 2,100 KB | 779 |
| 2544 x 1696 JPEG (M2, q8) | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.35 | 1,500 KB | 906 |
| *1 | The Mark II uses a lossless compression (similar to Zip compression) on RAW files, thus they can vary slightly in size depending on ISO sensitivity and the amount of detail in the image. |
| *2 | File size reported here is the size of the RAW and JPEG files added together. For our tests we chose Large, quality 8 (default). |
All I can say is wow, first of all the camera's Compact Flash performance
is amazing, it's easily as fast as our fastest device (Firewire card reader)
and is probably as fast as these cards could possibly go. That however
is overshadowed by the blistering performance put in on its SD interface
with that SanDisk Ultra II SD card, just 1.68 seconds to write over 10
MB of data is truly impressive.
The EOS-1D Mark II features the same large NP-E3 battery specified as has been used in the 1D and 1Ds. This battery is specified as 1650 mAh at 12 V, which works out as 19.8 Wh (or about 2.5 times the power of the EOS-10D's Lithium-Ion battery. Unlike the EOS-10D this battery pack uses NiMH (Nickel Metal Hydride) battery technology. I am honestly surprised that Canon are sticking with NiMH in what is the third generation 'EOS-1D' digital SLR, I would have expected them to shift to the lighter weight Lithium-Ion or Lithium-Polymer batteries by now.
UPDATE: It's worth noting that several members of our Canon 1D/1Ds forum who are long term EOS-1D users have noted significantly better battery life from the Mark II, to the magnitude of five or six times longer. This could be related to the switch from CCD to CMOS.