
Compared to Nikon Coolpix 950, Olympus C-2020Z, Canon PowerShot S10
In all my reviews I try to present a comparison with other
digicams. In these sets of sample images all the cameras were setup in
exactly the same manner, had the same subjects, lighting and camera settings
(as close as possible). Other Resolution charts and Colour patches now
available through the camera comparison database. These three cameras
were chosen as they are all 2.1mp (1600 x 1200).
Colour Comparison
Shot in daylight, Auto White Balance, EV compensation +0.3
(all cameras).
 |
 |
Canon Digital IXUS (PowerShot S100)
|
Canon PowerShot S10 |
 |
 |
Nikon Coolpix 950
|
Olympus C-2020Z |
Nikon and Olympus still piping Canon to the post for
white balance and colour saturation, both the Digital IXUS and S10 images
have fairly good white balance but noticeably less saturated colours.
We're only measuring colour here. RGB values below were
taken from a VGA reduced image (to average colours and eliminate JPEG
artifacts) using the Eyedropper tool in Photoshop with a 5 by 5 dropper
average. (Red, Green, Blue)
| |
Canon
Digital IXUS
|
Canon
PowerShot S10 |
Nikon
Coolpix 950 |
Olympus
C-2020Z |
| Patch White |
197,201,206 |
209,213,220 |
198,198,198 |
197,200,200 |
| |
|
|
|
| Middle Gray |
84,85,96
|
112,111,128 |
105,108,108 |
97,101,107 |
| |
|
|
|
| Patch Red |
135,18,29 |
173,40,54 |
215,31,41 |
211,27,39 |
| |
|
|
|
| Patch Green |
30,123,50 |
58,137,96 |
0,148,67 |
0,140,61
|
| |
|
|
|
| Patch Blue |
27,37,83
|
43,50,108
|
57,51,132 |
43,44,139 |
| |
|
|
|
Resolution Comparison
Shots here are of the PIMA/ISO 12233 standard resolution
test chart (more available for comparison in our comparison database).
Studio light, cameras set to Auto, Exposure compensation +0.7 EV for all
cameras. How to read the charts: All values are 1/100th lines per picture
height. So the "10" value equates to 1000.
 |
 |
Canon Digital IXUS (PowerShot 100
Digital Elph)
|
 |
 |
Canon PowerShot S10
|
 |
 |
Nikon Coolpix 950
|
 |
 |
Olympus C-2020Z
|
Measurable findings (three measurements taken for each camera):
| Camera |
Measurement |
Absolute Res. |
Extinction Res. |
Canon Digital IXUS
(PowerShot S100) |
Horiz LPH |
750 |
1050 |
| Vert LPH |
750 |
1000 |
| 5o Diagonal |
700 |
1000 |
| Canon PowerShot S10 |
Horiz LPH |
850 |
1150 |
| Vert LPH |
850 |
1100 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
700 |
n/a |
| Nikon Coolpix 950 |
Horiz LPH |
750 |
1050 |
| Vert LPH |
750 |
1050 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
800 |
n/a |
| Olympus C-2020Z |
Horiz LPH |
800 |
1100 |
| Vert LPH |
700 |
1050 |
| 5o Diagonal LPH |
900 |
1000 |
Definition of terms:
| LPH |
Lines per Picture Height (to allow
for different aspect ratios the measurement is the same for horizontal
and vertical) |
| 5o Diagonal |
Lines set at 5o diagonal |
| Absolute Resolution |
Still defined detail (below Nyquist
frequency*) |
| Extinction Resolution |
Detail beyond camera's definition
(becomes a solid gray alias) |
| n/a |
Not Available (above the capability
of the test chart) |
| n/v |
Not Visible (not visible on test
results) |
* Nyquist frequency defined as the highest spatial frequency
where the CCD can still faithfully record
image detail. Beyond the Nyquist frequency aliasing occurs.
So the Digital IXUS doesn't have the amazing sharpness
and resolution of it's older brother the S10, though it's fairly comparable
to the Nikon Coolpix 950 / Olympus C-2020Z of last year.
Flat area noise

The samples above are of 50 x 50 blocks cropped from
the colour comparison charts above of the Medium gray patch (marked 'M'),
each block is then broken down into it's red green and blue channels and
reflected as such directly below.
The Digital IXUS exhibits some "speckling"
of noise on what should be a flat gray block, note how much better the
S10 performs. These interesting results could be related to (a) smaller
CCD in the Digital IXUS and (b) switch from the CYGM colour filer array
of the S10 to an GRGB colour filter array in the Digital IXUS.
|