|
|
|||
|
| Canon EOS-D30 @ ISO 200 | Nikon D1 @ ISO 200 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
As I said earlier, D1 owners are begging (and have been for several months) Nikon for a firmware update which will fix the obvious problem with the D1's JPEG format, jaggies, over sharpening, poor colours and noise (where there really shouldn't be any) have forced many D1 users to switch to RAW for all their shooting (which produces much better results but is much more costly in storage and time). On balance I feel the D30 performs very well against a camera costing $2,000 more.
Exposure: 1/5s F9.0. D30 image converted using Canon TWAIN, D1 image converted using Bibble (WB Sunny, No Auto Level, Gamma Corrected).
| Canon EOS-D30 @ ISO 200, RAW | Nikon D1 @ ISO 200, RAW |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Download as: 8-bit TIFF 4,185 KB SHQ JPEG 1,525 KB |
Download as: 8-bit TIFF 4,512 KB SHQ JPEG 1,751 KB D1 NEF 3,961 KB |
Early adopters of the D1 were disappointed to find very strong pattern noise (a repeated diagonal or vertical line pattern) across images at high ISO's (sensitivities). The comparisons below compare the D30's noise to the D1 at ISO 400, 800 and 1600.
| Canon EOS-D30 @ ISO 400 | Nikon D1 @ ISO 400 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Canon EOS-D30 @ ISO 800 | Nikon D1 @ ISO 800 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Canon EOS-D30 @ ISO 1600 | Nikon D1 @ ISO 1600 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Conclusion? Hmm.. Well I wouldn't want to use either of these cameras for anything too critical at ISO 1600, certainly nothing that wasn't going to be reduced in size. Shooting for the web, smallish prints or a family album and you could certainly get away with ISO 800. The D30's noise looks more "film like" in that it's random, not a defined pattern like the D1, so that probably makes it easier to remove, but overall I'd probably call this part of the comparison a dead heat.