Sony Mavica FD-75

Announced Feb 9, 2001 •
0 megapixels | 2.5 screen | 40 – 400 mm (10×)
0
replies

I have been taking pictures for the past 4 years with a Canon EOS . I just recently decided to try digital. WOW!! I am very dissapointed with the quality of the images. I am have since this purchased educated myself about digital cameras. For someone who knows what a good print is I feel that I should have gone with a 3 or 4 pixel camera. I indend to bring this camera back and buy a better camera before I give up on the digital world.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

I had an Fd-87 and exhanged it for the FD-75. The 75 had been around longer and had , what I thought were, better features and was also less expensive. It lived up to my expectations, right up to picture quality. I was sorely disappointed. It too has been returned. Next stop..Fd-92. Problems: Somewhat power hungry in comparison with the 87.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Richard
 
0
replies

noise and compression are terrible flash is not worth using--that is when it decides to work.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review