Sony Mavica CD200

Announced Feb 28, 2001 •
2 megapixels | 2.5 screen | 39 – 117 mm (3×)
Toaster
 
0
replies

Good camera. I am satisifed with performance. Large LCD is good. Image quality is fabulous especially with flash or daylight and not that bad even without flash. Performs well in low-light situations w/ flash. Image resolution is more than sufficient for web. Navigation is not cumbersome. Good control options. Manual photo controls helpful. Movie clip feature is useful. I like Cd-r/rw media is convenient. I use it a bit (perhaps too obsessively!). Problems: Trouble installing Direct CD. PC ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

I owned this camera since last three month. I took this camera to India and took lots of pictures which turned out great. I am very happy to own this camera. Problems: The built-in flash is not very effected.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

Owned for 5 months - great camera, good features, love the mini-cd storage. I took lots a pictures at a large family gathering (interstate). Simply copied the shots onto my relatives laptop. Overall I've taken about 750 shots. Problems: I miss a viewfinder, the screen is a bit hard to see in bright daylight. Expensive to buy in Australia.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

I have been told "You should not have a camer" Not any more. That says it all. Problems: none

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Chabba
 
0
replies

After debating for several weeks between the CD200 and CD300 I finally decided to op for the CD200 and it's been great fun. I do sometimes wonder if I should have spent the £150 extra but I'd probably never use it or even notice the extra quality. I've just been using the auto settings at the moment and the pictures have turned out fine. I'll be slowly posting the pictures onto my website (www.madj.co.uk) and especially after my holiday. I've also tried the mpeg facility and outputting to ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

I just used the Canon powershot A20 for two weeks. I simply love it compare to my old Olympus d-500 However, I have owned A digital camera for a few years and one of the Limitations of digital cameras is reliable transfer of storage. I have lost many pictures do to not proper storing or just not having enough time to transfer images resulting in lost photos. MY main reason for my switch is the Ability to burn the CD'S and forget about Them . . But I think the CD burn could become a digital ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

Want to jump in here. Appreciate all the pro's and con's of the 200 which I am looking into. But I agree with Rue - that is exactly why I am looking into it. Also, bear in mind (assume many of you are Americans); I am Canadian and our prices are substantially higher than yours. The 200 is going for $1400.00 up here and even our disks are much more expensive; therefore the cost factor and re-useability DO play an important part. Figure that by the time I use a CF card AND buy the ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review