Pentax K-01

Announced Feb 2, 2012 •
16 megapixels | 3 screen | APS-C sensor
orendanger
 
15
replies

ok i love it first thing i really do its big for a mirorles however it outperforms most aps-c dslr of its year BUT BUT it has a slight meetering problem it wants to use slow shutter speeds alwayes

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
robbo d
 
6
replies

I picked up a cheap nice used cam and have taken it out over the last few days. It made an interesting comparison after using my DSLR's and my recent 'ben hur' post about mirror less. Interface: Same as all other Pentax cams, so very easy and it is one of those things I enjoy about staying within the family. Handling: Not to bad, I grew up with SLR's, but I did find I missed few shots because my finger wasn't on the shutter button properly. The grip is smaller, but I didnt find it bothersome, ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
2
replies

Okay, I have had the "brick" for over 12 months now, and I have shot several thousand images with it. Firstly, why did I buy it? Well the reasons were, I rather like the looks, it is unique, it is different, it would give my K-5 some breathing space on a day to day basis (I always carry a camera with me, even to work), oh and at the time it was a mere £240 brand new when I bought it. So a quarter of the price of my K-5 when I bought that, yet has the same sensor. :-) So, after 12 months of ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
yohanitis
 
2
replies

The same 16MP sensor from the K-5 yields excellent IQ. The styling of this mirrorless is very boxy and unique. It is the only ILC that uses lenses from a native SLR/DSLR without having to use an adapter.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
25
replies

Easy enough. Summed up by another forum... goes like this: (1) better video than K5 (2) Focus peaking (K5 -none) (3) cheaper than K5 (4) IQ the same as K5 (5) DXO mark 79 on par with K5 /D7000 at a smaller price (6) Smaller and refreshing look than K5 (7) Native K nount (8) Cheaper than NEX7 (9) Best IQ in its class

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
MaDog
 
11
replies

I bought one and like it. :) Size is not a bad thing, has a bigger batery and K-mount. The IQ is very good and the image quality is also very good. With newest firmware the AF is good.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
MasDhani
 
5
replies

This is my 1st camera, actually when I want to buying camera, I focused on budget, and after I browsing I found this K-01, at that time there is promotion, and I buy at $460 with 2 lens kit, 18-55mm and 50-200mm, day by day I used this camera, I fell this is an amazing camera, with special price and full with feature, may be because I'm still newbie, but trust me this is a solid & great camera :D and as a mirrorless camera he doesn't need to use any adapter for other Pentax lens, because he ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

The more I use this camera the more I change how I think of photography. The world of "serious" photography revolves around the large, traditional, film based DSLR. This is not what the K 01 is and should not be criticized for not following on that well worn path. This is more along the lines of being a modern rangefinder. No, it does not have a rangefinder style viewfinder focus system. It has what a modern camera would use instead. This is focus peaking and a live view screen on the back. A ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

I purchased and tested the K-01 along with two standard zooms, the Sigma and Tamron 17-50 f2.8's. I eventually returned the camera and lenses, because it was just too big for a mirrorless, no viewfinder, camera. To me, the K-01 sits in a no-camera-land between DSLRs and Mirrorless ILCs, being VERY close in size to the DSLR as a body and especially when using full size K mount lenses, but without the essential view finder to enabling optimal handling with full size lenses. To find a more ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review