Panasonic Lumix DMC-F7

1.9 megapixels | 1.5" screen | 35 – 70 mm (2×)

User reviews

Average rating: 3.83
5 stars
(1)
4 stars
(9)
3 stars
(2)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
12
Sergio Alves
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Sergio Alves posted on Feb 20, 2005 UTC

Opinion: I bought this camera in July 2004. My idea was to get a camera that gave good quality pictures and was small enough to carry in my pocket without being seen, as cost-effective as possible. As far as one can tell for his first digital camera, I think it takes good quality pictures. I found this camera for about 130 Euros (about the same in US dollars - because it was discontinued, I suppose), and I think it is a very good deal at that price.

Problems: It has a proprietary battery (instead of AA batteries) that does not last very long.
The flash only works well at small distances.
Memory card of only 8 Mb (about 15 pictures at the highest size - but you can buy a much larger one today for a relatively low price)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
afp_global
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: afp_global posted on Oct 17, 2004 UTC

Opinion: I bought this excellent camera at a very low discounted (and discontinued) price, as a "happy snapper" for my children.

I had read reviews about the other range of Panasonic cameras and was considering by a high-end model, particularly because of their great Leica optics. But i cound not find any reviews about this camera

For the low price, i thought it would be ideal for the children and their school trips, scouting weekends, parties, etc...but first i tried a few shots myself and was really amazed at the quality for what is now camera technology over 2 years old.

One thing this camera has done is to shatter the misconception which most people have is that more pixels means more quality. At the highest quality setting on images of Venice taken by my teenage daughter and filling the whole screen of my 17" LCD monitor were simply breath-taking.

Problems: Some night-shots did not work out for her but only because the distance was too long for the power of flash.

It even has video, but this has to be selected from the menu system rather than an exterior button.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Nuclear
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Nuclear posted on Feb 26, 2004 UTC

Opinion: The F7 is a relativly good camera. For 350$ I wouldn't expect anything better.
The image quality is excellent for 2 megapixel, it's sharp and clear.
Macro focus is also very clean, which I really love in this camera.
My problems with it, are the lack of manual features: The focus- it's so hard focusing on a flower, when the camera keep trying to focus on the background, and aperture- I had to come up with some tricks to override it.

Overall it's a really nice camera, good worth for the money, and if you are not a professional, you wouldn't need any more than that.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Jock Dickson
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Jock Dickson posted on Apr 27, 2003 UTC

Opinion: I purchased my F7 as my first DC. I have been impressed with the picture quality both on monitor and printout. The camera captured high speed action images extremely well for a camera in the price range and available features. My only complaint (very slight) is the access to required functions through the LCD and the low battery life. Apart from these minor pains the camera is an excellent point and shoot and can surprise with the quality of images produced. I replaced my ageing SLR with the above and do not regret it so far.
Whe all sead and done you get what you pay for and you cant expect this camera to capture images as good as an upper level SLR but overall I think it is good value for money and if you are considering buying one you can e-mail me and I will forward and image ( high speed action) that may help you in your decision.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
hobartguy84
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: hobartguy84 posted on Apr 22, 2003 UTC

Opinion: Well this is my first digital camera so its hard to tell if its generally a good or bad camera. I have found that in a brightly lit room, or outside on a sunny day, this camera works very well producing good image quality. I've only ever had one lot of images printed out. They were from a formal and they turned out quite well. These photos were taken at night and i was happy with how they turned out. In the first few days i took lots of photos of flowers and trees etc. This camera seems to do a very nice close up. It runs into trouble when u take a picture of a view or a bunch of people in a room. I bought this camera mainly for the size, it just slips into my pocket and i can take it out and snap a photo.

Problems: The battery only lasts for about 60mins which means when you go away on holidays with this camera don't forget to take the recharge cord!! (believe me i had to get someone to bring the cord to me the day i started taking photos and ran out of battery)

The flash is poor. Make sure when you take photos at night that the person isn't a long way away from the camera. Also at night it takes forever for the flash to work and then warm up.

Some of the functions in the menu are beyond the understading of my beginners brain. The one titled "Exposure" and then with a range from -2 to +2 seems to make no difference to my shots so that one still remains a mystery. - this is not the cameras fault its mine!

I'm being picky, generally this is a good camera! If you can remember try and use red eye reduction, a good feature!

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Stephen Chen
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Stephen Chen posted on Mar 31, 2003 UTC

Opinion: I've had the F7 for several months now. It can be picked up for fairly low prices as it is being replaced by the 3 mp F1.

There aren't a lot of nice features to the F7 to speak of. The zoom, UI, and operation are sub-par. Most notably the UI requires a considerable amount of digging through menus to alter settings. But this does make it a good camera for beginners as there isn't a whole lot to play around with on the outside. It is a well designed camera from an aesthetics standpoint. Battery is weak.

Image quality can be quite nice at low ISO settings, but at higher settings, the CCD is far too noisy. Camera uses 1/15 shutter speed as minimum in low-light, but it would have been smarter for >1/30, so expect blurry pictures in low light usage without LCD. The color rendition can be quite pleasant, but takes a bit of fiddling to perfect.

In short, if you want a small pocketable camera, you might be better off getting a Sony U20. If you want something more advanced, a Canon Elph will probably be a better buy. But if you see this camera for cheap, it's not a bad P+S to play around with.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Nick Bower
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Nick Bower posted on Jan 10, 2003 UTC

Opinion: There seems to be little substance to the above reviews. I bought this camera after not doing a great deal of research and regret it. It's a nice small build with convenient size and excellent looks, but I have two main problems; 1) image quality, and 2) clanky menu system.

i'm going to take mine back - i'm a 35mm slr photographer that thought i'd at least get moderate quality for holiday snaps from a compacy digital, but was left quite disappointed by the less than ordinary image quality.

Problems: 1. image quality.

1a. no dynamic range - have a white building on an otherwise flat scene and the building texture is serverely saturated.

1b. i've several situations in which images are eriously tainted in blue due to the winter low-sun and blue-sky light conditions. manually adjusting the white balance did not help and i've come to the conclusion that there are well lit situations in which this camera just can't perform.

1c. have noticed extreme chromatic aberation around trees etc on white overcast skies.

2. two menu features are accessed by menus. adjusting sensitivity, white balance, motion picture settings are common and should require flicking through several menus.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Tim Cottam
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Tim Cottam posted on Dec 7, 2002 UTC

Opinion: I just bought this camera a week ago after loosing my Canon IXUS 330 (Powershot S330) at my work Christmas party (very drunk). I work at Officeworks as a Business Machines Specialist and have had a Panasonic Rep. come to our store when they introduced there Lumix range. We were all happy with what we saw and with using the Leica lens and with Panasonics reliability and quality with any electrical products, well we were excited. So i went out and bought the F7 as a cheap ($580AU) compensation to my IXUS 330 ($1,000). As soon as i pulled it out the box on the way home from buying it, i was happy with the appearance and size. After inserting the battery hopping it was charged from the factory (it was) i noticed a thin, long metal flap to keep the battery in place, it is a bad design and seems to have a very week hinge. At first it seemed to be difficult to use but after a few hours it is actualy very easy to with every thing at your finger tips. The front of the camera and half the sides is brushed steel and seems to be well built. The menu system is not very well designed but seems to flow when using the camera (strange). On the front of the camera to the left is a sliding switch which has a two stage action the first, slides over the lens cover to reveal the lovely Lieca 2x zoom lens, the next action locks the switch in to place and acts as a power on switch. Even though it has been awkwardly placed (not in reach). It has a good selection of manual modes, you can change the ISO speeds for 100, 200 or 400 which is not bad for the price and ultra compact design. It has movie mode and lot of other features expected, it also has video out and DC in. The quality of the image is unknown as i have not transfered any pics to my computer yet, but from what i've heard it is not to bad. If you can find this camera for $499 with 8Mb SD card standard + a bonus 16Mb SD card, you've got a great buy (Teds Cameras has the black version for $499). I may not speak very highly of this camera in my review but it all comes down to price, for $499 you will not find a better camera with optical zoom and the ultra compact size.

Problems: The problems i have noticed first was the very poor quality LCD screen which is dull, grainy and slow to respond. the menu system is unattractive and difficult to use, you can tell they did not put much thought or time in to the menu system. The buttons have a poor quality feel to them especialy the zoom in/out button and the 4- way pad, which is not very directional and seems to float a bit. The rear and half the sides of the camera are cheap looking simmiler to that of a Kodak. The battery/memory door is poorly hinge and constructed, also the metal flap that holds the battery in is thin, long and awkward with a week hinge that seems it will be a problem later on. The eyelet were the hand/neck strap goes through swivels around but seems to be un even and has a loose feel to it. The flash at times is uneven and seems to be under powered slightly, but with feather testing in more open spaces meets the task. Were the DC power inlet is seems to be slightly misalgined, most likely a thing just check your camera before paying for it. The rubber cover that sits over the USB and video connection is thin and flimsy. Don't be putt off from the problems i have mentioned as i am a Business Machines Specialist and it is my job to find these problems and to be this fussy, also i am comparing this to my previous camera (IXUS 330). Comparing this camera to whats out there for the price of $499 this is a great camera.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
kunzwerks
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: kunzwerks posted on Nov 12, 2002 UTC

Opinion: Have been using this camera for about 6 months. I like the
compact size, go anywhere, easy to carry profile. Menu
structure is straight forward and easy to use.

Things I wish it had, are a faster response when taking
photos and a bigger memory (I had upgraded mine to 64M)

I shoot most of my snaps using the mid-resolution setting
and am happy with the quality once downloaded onto a
computer. I find a 2 Megapixel camera is fine for what I do.

This is a great little camera for everyday use and am very
happy with it.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
12