Olympus E-3

10.1 megapixels | 2.5" screen | Four Thirds sensor

User reviews

Average rating: 4.70
5 stars
(59)
4 stars
(6)
3 stars
(1)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(1)
Sort by
1234567
sadwitch
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: sadwitch posted on Sep 14, 2011 UTC

Opinion: Well it's been 3 years since the launch of this olympus flag ship dslr and as old as it sounds in digital era terms, it's still alive and kicking and I'm still happily shooting with it.

Love the viewfinder, ergonomics, super control panel, live view flip swivel screen, jpeg colors and engine, In-body stabilisation, ability to use a multitude of manual lenses via adapters, last but not least the access to very nice zuiko digital lenses.

Problems: No so great hi-iso images
a little too big and heavy but it does handles well
useless xd card slot
Battery life could be better
AF tracking not up there with the best

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
olyflyer
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: olyflyer posted on Jul 29, 2010 UTC

Opinion: I had the camera for almost two years. Upgraded from the E-500 it gave me what I wanted from the start.

It is well built except for the LCD panel which is a very weak part. The shutter noise is a bit too harsh and loud indoors. The edges are not smooth, so holding the camera a full day is a bit painful. Image quality is excellent under certain ideal conditions but less than average in more difficult situations. The Auto WB is not reliable in every kind of light, can not manage modern low energy light, even if it is intensive. Manual WB reading is also not working reliably under those conditions. Overall, the Auto WB is quite poor in every light except sunny conditions outdoor. ISO up to ISO 800 is very good but over that the noise takes over more and more. The noise is very unreal, not film like at all, so handling it is difficult in critical images. Noise reduction works but removes too much detail which is why ISO 800 is the limit for the camera.

The Auto focus is not fast at all, in spite of what Olympus promised. It is also not very reliable and it is quite inaccurate.

Poor LCD resolution.

For all the listed problems below, the camera was sent in for service. After the service (took two weeks!) the camera was returned and no difference could be observed, except that the image sensor was cleaned. Olympus did not manage to do anything about the auto focus and the LCD.

Finally I sold the camera and the whole system and bought a Nikon D300s.

Problems: I had serious dust on the sensor after less than one year. It needed wet cleaning twice during my less than two years with the camera. The SSWF is not as reliable as claimed, which is my experience with the E-500 as well.

LCD frame was breaking apart. It is a very bad construction, not reflecting the rest of the camera and making the weather sealing and durability argument invalid.

White balance reading is inaccurate, unreliable and not working at all under certain light.

Auto focus is slow, imprecise and unreliable compared with the Nikon D300s.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Olyuser
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Olyuser posted on Dec 13, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I upgraded recently from Olympus E-500, it was my first digital camera and used it for 3 years before getting the E-3. I found the move extremely satisfying, the E-3 was what I was looking for after exploring the features of the E-500 fully. The E-3 build is superb, I used it in rain and snow without any problems. The image quality is very good, noise is better controlled than the E-500. I upgraded my lenses with the ZD 12-60 SWD and the ZD 50-200 SWD whose quality is unsurpassed so far. I recommend this camera to any serious photographer but not to a beginner because it has a high learning curve.

Problems: Almost none, however after getting the HLD4 battery grip, I noticed that when using only one battery in it, the camera stops sometimes after the mirror lifts up and I have to reset it with the power switch. I have to get it serviced since it is still under warranty. With 2 batteries there is no problem whatsoever. Also sometimes the autofocus seems to hunt in low light.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Parasin
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Parasin posted on Dec 13, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I've bought E-3 in August last year and so far it has
proven to be flawless in reliability.
Tank-like construction allows me to get the shots I'd
never even think of taking with my previous camera.
So far I haven't found a weak spot on this camera.

Problems: Non what so ever.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
lalitjee
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: lalitjee posted on Jul 10, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I ordered E3+12-60 +shld+metz 48af set up. The image quality is supreme and camera response is superfast. Now I am using Olympus master software to process raw and this set up just super.
After 2 months of use I added50mm+Olypus Studio software to this setup

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
dmcwoo904
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: dmcwoo904 posted on May 9, 2009 UTC

Opinion: -Sharp image with nice colour reproduction
-Very effective image stabilizer, can handheld to shoot at 1/8
-Superb Zuiko optic (Sharp and no vignette at wide open for ZD 12-60SWD)
-Slash proof body
-Adjustable LCD screen with live view
-5 frame per second
-Dual memory card slots. You can put another 2 gb xD card and You can keep
shooting even the main CF card is full but you don’t have time to change the CF.
-Very fast Auto focus for SWD lens
-Good ISO performance from 100-400

Problems: -Dynamic range not as good as Nikon or Canon
-ISO performance at 800 or above is poor than Nikon or Canon
-Poor indoor White Balance
-low resolution LCD screen. When you compare it to D90 or 50D 3 inch LCD, it is
really one generation behind

I am a Nikon user for about 10 years. I own both FX and DX format Nikon DSLR, so
I can compare the different between Olympus and Nikon. The reason to invest in
4/3 is simply because of two zoom lenses: ZD 12-60 and ZD 50-200 SWD. These
lenses combine with light weigh, large aperture (f2.8), fast auto focus and water
proof. Only 4/3 format can offer you all of these at the same time.
Honestly, Nikon provide better Dynamic range and ISO performance than E3.
However, the Zuiko 12-60 SWD can narrow the gap for ISO. For example, you can
only shoot at 3.5 at wide and 5.6 at 85 for Nikon 16-85 AFS. But you can shoot at
2.8 to 4 with E3 which provide one stop advantage. This mean if you need ISO 800
for Nikon at f3.5, you only need ISO 400 for E3 at f2.8. Due to the smaller sensor
of E3, the deep of field are the same for f3.5 at Nikon DX and f2.8 for E3.
Moreover, you can always use a tripod to avoid low ISO shoot.
The major problem of the E3 is the Dynamic range. When you shoot in some
extreme lighting condition, the highlight area will easily blowout. There are two
ways to avoid it. You can shoot one more shoot at lower EV (-0.5 or -1) and check
the LCD. (There is a function show highlighted section) Or you can use the COKIN
ND filter to avoid highlight blowout. This filter provide ND8 on the top half and
normal exposure at the bottom half.
In conclusion, E3 is a very good landscape camera combine with ZD12-60 and 50-
200SWD. But if you primary shooting Portrait and like the sharp front and blur
background effect, it is not the choice for you due to limitation of the small 4/3
sensor.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
NlHP
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: NlHP posted on Mar 30, 2009 UTC

Opinion: Great camera. After E10 and E1 a logical choice. I like the image quality and the speed of the autofocus which is way better than the E1. The white balance is also better. I very much like the feel and the strong construction. I enjoy using this camera a lot.

Problems: The ring around the viewfinder easily gets loose and lost. I own the camera 8 months now, and am using my third one (the second replacement).
I also had a problem with my Zuiko 50-200 lense, from which some inner part came loose which is fixed now. Also had the body checked because the part might have hit the mirror.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Ingrid M
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Ingrid M posted on Mar 27, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I have now taken in excess of 25,000 photos with my E-3 in a 16 month period and can say that it is a very reliable workhorse. The colour is great, the noise cleans up very well between and 1200 an 1600 ISO, depending on the lighting conditions (below that the noise is not an issue). The camera has been accidentally dropped from a table which was one meter above the ground onto a concrete floor and it just kept on working. It has been used in gale force winds, downpours of rain and stifling heat, without missing a beat. I can honestly say that it is a huge step up from the E-1 in many ways and I look forward to the next step in the 'pro Olympus' body line. I shoot with the 7-14, 12-60 and 50-200 and can't see me changing from Olympus because the quality of the lenses is outstanding. What I lose in low light capabilities with the E-3 (compared to the larger sensors of the competition) I definately gain in reach, and that's the payback. I rarely shoot in low light so this is a good choice of camera for me.

Problems: I would still prefer to have a mode 'dial' as opposed to buttons, but that's just me being old fashioned. I would also like the rear LCD to be slightly bigger with better resolution.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
s85 goleta ca
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: s85 goleta ca posted on Feb 19, 2009 UTC

Opinion: Drop Test! E-3 slid off roof of Infiniti G37 w/ 18-180 lens to concrete...slight black removal on edge of lens UV filter, but that was it--incredible! Lens cover popped off. E-3 has been working fine since it happened last month. Must have hit on rubber of eyepiece? Not sure, only heard it hit the road. My hands were too full carrying a large framed photo, so I set the camera on the freshly waxed roof, thinking it would stay. I need to put some soft, sticky rubber feet on base of camera? Or just take more time and pay attention. Darn Alzheimers.

18-180 lens has been great for all sorts of shooting. added 70-300 for more zoom for birds, etc. Will probably get a macro zoom at some point. Also, have the FL-50 flash unit to get some light on more distant objects.

Love the articulating screen (learned this from the Canon A620) and Live view for difficult shots, as I would otherwise rarely be able to take the time to set up. As others have mentioned, Jpeg is good enough to avoid getting into Raw processing, so that makes it easy to get started for a novice like myself.

Problems: Camera just takes time to understand all of the settings and uses. Will be nice when larger, more detailed viewscreen is added. Would also be nice to have a faster Live view focus & shutter response -- probably I do not know how to use the focus lock properly. I do not use the Live view often enough...I will need to spend another session or two with the "Elite Video" training DVD and the Oly manual.

Next cameras will probably be the 24MP level when prices come down, and/or the Micro 4/3rds systems coming out. Will be nice if a little HD video was thrown in with the speedy microprocessors for the SLR's in the future.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report